The past week must have been exciting for local balloteer Tim Eyman. First, the state Supreme Court appeared to side with Eyman when it heard arguments from Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown about the consitutionality of Initiative 960, last year's successful Eyman-sponsored measure requiring a two-thirds vote in both houses of the Legislature to raise taxes. Brown had hoped to get the court to directly address the issue, but observers said the justices weren't receptive to her arguments. Eyman sent out a press release later that day claiming victory. ...
Eyman's press release also asked for money. Apparently he needs it. Erica C. Barnett at the Stranger recently reported that the ballot king's campaign "appears to be around $230,000 in the hole, as Eyman has not yet repaid a $150,000 loan and the campaign has spent about $80,000 more than it has received in contributions."
Still, a lack of funding hasn't stopped him from promoting the heck out of his latest traffic congestion measure, Initiative 985. Last week, he taunted the state government, warning them in an open letter to "start getting ready" to implement the measure if it passes into law. But as Brad Shannon at The Olympian reports, lawmakers aren't exactly shaking in their boots about I-985. A spokesman for Gov. Chris Gregoire called Eyman's taunts a "might presumptuous."
Today, Eyman found friends in an unlikely place – the editorial board at The Seattle Times, which argues that voters deserve to have a clear ballot title for Charter Amendment 7, a measure that, if passed, would double the number of signatures required to put an initiative on the ballot. A King County Superior Court judge will decide later today whether to order elections officials to change the title. Eyman, however, will be hoping like mad that the charter amendment will fail – no matter the language – because if it passes, the law would effectively put Eyman and his initiative machine out of business in King County. ...
A few odds and ends from the news:
Regaining the edge: Republican gubernatorial candidate Dino Rossi more than doubled Democratic Gov. Chris Gregoire's fundraising total for August, raising $1 million in a three-week period, compared to Gregoire's $473,000. Still, Rossi also spent about $2.15 million during the month, while Gregoire spent a cool $1.26 million. ...
Re-reading 1984: The Seattle Times reports some Seattle police officers are now wearing pager-sized cameras to record "exact accounts" of events and hold police more accountable. Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union told The Times it was concerned about moving toward a "surveillance society." ...
Re-watching 1973: Politico's Ben Smith dug up this video of a previously unseen video of McCain's release from the Hanoi Hilton. ...
For the young guns: In the wake of this series of articles from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer about youth gang culture, Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels has proposed spending $9 million to help cut juvenile violent crimes in half by June 2010. ...
For He giveth, and He taketh away: University of Washington professor David Domke, an expert on faith and politics, writes in today's Times that McCain has to be careful not to lose moderate voters while courting evangelical Christians. ...
For us, by us: And finally, there's a new study saying Sound Transit's new proposal will "cut car and truck travel as much as 30 percent, reduce carbon dioxide pollution by nearly 100,000 tons a year and save consumers $41 million annually in reduced fuel costs if voters approve the plan and commuters switch to transit." A note: The study was conducted by consultants for Sound Transit. ...
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email






Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Thu, Sep 11, 2:51 p.m. Inappropriate
Thought CA7 only applied to initiatives that attempt to modify the King County Charter, and not to Eyman's statewide measures. To the best of my knowledge, Eyman hasn't been behind any charter-amendment initiatives... or has he?
Posted Thu, Sep 11, 3:41 p.m. Inappropriate
I wasn't suggesting we wouldn't be seeing Tim Eyman anymore. I'm saying he's currently fighting for the right to be able to amend the county charter – something that would be nearly impossible should this new measure passes. So to speak, he would be out of the King County Charter-amending business – whether he was in it to begin with or not.
Posted Thu, Sep 11, 5:30 p.m. Inappropriate
Judge exposes King County Council: From: Tim Eyman
RE: Judge exposes King County County Council's sneak attack on initiative process - sides with the voters
" ... but in the interests of transparency, in the interests of public disclosure, the voters deserve to be told ..." said King County Judge John P. Erlick today in the ballot title challenge to Amendment 7.
Judge Erlick exposed the King County Council's sneak attack on the initiative process, rewriting the description of this proposed charter amendment on the fall ballot to alert voters that the current 10% signature theshold for initiatives is being increased to 20%. Today's Seattle Times editorial advocated the same thing DON'T STEP ON INITIATIVES http://www.seattletimes.com as did an earlier Seattle PI editorial: LOOKING FOR CLARITY http://www.seattlepi.com.
What Ron Sims and the King County Council tried to do was hide their true agenda from the voters: gutting the initiative process. Judge Erlick put a spotlight on their sneak attack and so now, thanks to him, the voters will know the facts about anti-initiative Amendment 7 before voters in November.
Judge Erlick put a stake in the heart of Amendment 7 today - there's no way the voters will approve it now that they know the truth about it.
No county with a 20% signature theshold has ever had a successful initiative (Pierce, Snohomish, Whatcom, etc). There's only been 4 citizen initiatives in 6 years in King County with the 10% signature theshold -- it's clear that the process is already tough enough.
Judge Erlick's rewritten ballot title appears below:
Shall King County Charter Section 800 be amended to establish a new process for citizens to directly propose amendments to the King County Charter and to increase the signature threshold for citizen-initiated charter amendments from 10% to 20% of the votes cast in the last election for county executive, as provided in Ordinance No. 16221?