Seattle's leading growth industry — cooking up new schemes for the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement — has a new product, courtesy of a retired fireman in Miami named Jim Powers. This one would be 70 feet in the air (the present Viaduct is about 55 feet high), leaving a covered park down below. So far, the idea has been given the brushoff.
Powers may be from faraway Florida, but he's often visited his sisters in Seattle over the years. He says he got the idea for the soaring Seattle Skyway from France's Millau Viaduct, which puts six lanes as high as 885 feet in the air and was built for a mere $400 million, according to Powers. Powers figures he could build the Seattle Skyway for less than $1 billion, with 6-8 lanes of traffic, bike lanes, and some sound protection.
A chief advantage would be keeping the existing Alaskan Way Viaduct in place while the foundation columns are placed outside the old structure, 430 feet apart, and then 18 mammoth roadbed trusses of steel would be lifted into place. Result: little disruption of traffic, just three years of construction, and lots of highway capacity. Presumably the park underneath would have some rain protection, as well as room for surface Alaskan Way.
Powers says he is getting nowhere with the joint planning process being run by the state, Seattle, and King County, which is trying to practice birth control on all these schemes. It probably doesn't help Powers that his background is fighting fires, running a dredging business, and being a general contractor with a patent pending on his construction technique. His phone calls are not returned, he says, but he'll be in Seattle next week making a presentation to some businesses interested in preserving traffic flow and freight mobility. Hope springs eternal.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email






Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Thu, Sep 18, 8:28 p.m. Inappropriate
so close, I can almost touch it: We could reduce the cost quite a bit by hacking off those columns.
The money saved could remodel the Seattle Center.
Aurora, in Shoreline, between 145th and 150th for some strange reason was not elevated 80 feet into the air when they reworked that section of highway 99.
Why does my city have a strange desire to live in homes without yards, and force yards to appear everywhere on public property at the cost of millions.
Posted Thu, Sep 18, 11:06 p.m. Inappropriate
Perhaps I'm missing the joke, but why exactly would you want to have elevated Aurora Avenue in Shoreline?
Posted Fri, Sep 19, 12:01 a.m. Inappropriate
RE: so close, I can almost touch it: The desire to put this road up in the sky is as practical a solution as putting north Aorora up in the sky, that is none.
Do we really want to spend a billion dollars putting Aurora Ave with a waterfront view up in the sky for the express pleasure of having an endless grassy knoll?
They are the same road 3 miles away from each other, performing the same function, I am not telling a joke, I am telling you to not flush 350 million dollars down the toilet so you can put the road in the sky so you can have a lawn.
I live in "Seattle" and I would like sidewalks, and to have the open ditches covered, while high rise condo buyers downtown actively work to piss money away on insisting on elevating a road so they can have a lawn.
Just stop it, drive around this city and look at the rest of the "city" the rest of us live in, then tell me what a great idea the billion dollar lawn is.
Posted Fri, Sep 19, 9:07 a.m. Inappropriate
PLEASE DON'T: mention this to Frank Chopp.
Posted Sun, Sep 21, 4:19 p.m. Inappropriate
This actually makes sense: It's earthquake tolerant, it keeps the great views from Highway 99 through the city, it doesn't diminish capacity for this essential highway, it can be constructed while the existing viaduct remains in service, it's relatively inexpensive, and it opens up downtown to the waterfront. Unfortunately, it has little chance of getting a fair hearing in Seattle or the state government that Seattle so dominates exactly because it makes sense.
Posted Tue, Sep 23, 9:35 a.m. Inappropriate
We don't need more alternatives.: The people working on the viaduct do not need more alternatives.
They need to be left alone to do their work. You don't think they haven't already thought of this??? The viaduct team reviewed all sorts of elevated alternatives... over and over and over and over and over again.
It's not that its not feasible... its that its not desirable by the City of Seattle.
What the viaduct needs now is for the chief political decision makers to pony up and make a decision. They punted a year ago... lets see if they punt again.
It's time to throw a hail mary... or there will be no replacement.