The prospect of a POTUS with PTSD
My name is Jack, and I'm a combat veteran. ("Hi, Jack!")
Please note that being a combat vet doesn't make me more eligible than you or anyone else to run for office. It doesn't even qualify me to advise you on whom to vote for.
It does, however, make me want to vote for John McCain for president. He's a combat vet, too.
There's something about the nature of ultimate human struggle — and there's no struggle more ultimate than betting your life on your tribe — that informs men and women in ways that transcend homemaking, Wall Street trading, or adrenaline sports. You learn things about yourself that not even raising a teenager can teach.
You learn to keep faith with your compatriots. The guys around you — those who don't lose their dignity or humor, and that's most American servicemembers by a long shot — become your lifetime buddies. You may not see them again for years, because every reunion risks bringing as many tears as bad jokes and rehashed war stories, but they're your family forever. You never leave your buddies behind. Other people don't quite understand.
Then there's what we don't much talk about, that whole PTSD thing. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder sounds like something made up to keep psychology grad students busy, or maybe a seeping malfunction of our secret girly parts.
Actually, PTSD consists of adaptive physical changes to our brains. Coarsely put, we sustain significant atrophy of the neurological structures that allow us smoothly to form memories of the immediate past.
PTSD is not a weakness. It's a survival mechanism to get through hard times, and it works — but it leaves survivors erratic, forgetful, capricious, and snappishly intemperate. Vets (and others) with PTSD don't "recover" anymore than one would recover from a traumatic amputation. They adapt. You can trust me on this. Alternatively, you could check with any qualified Veterans Administration counselor, or with my patient and loving wife.
John McCain is a brother in arms. Naturally, I want to support him. I supported him during the Republican primary of 2000. Since then, Sen. McCain enthusiastically supported the Iraq campaign — but he voted against upgraded armor for troops there. He decried abysmally foul conditions at Walter Reed Army Hospital but voted against expansion of VA funding — and in favor of continuing the private outsourcing that resulted in moldy mattresses for wounded soldiers in the first place.
Whether Senator McCain has ever received treatment for PTSD is a mystery. His medical records are a closely guarded secret. What seems clear is that he suffers some symptoms — erratic decision-making, flaring tantrums of inappropriate temper, wandering forgetfulness — that are characteristic of PTSD. I don't pretend to be a psychologist, but for John McCain (or any man) to have undergone the deadly explosions on the USS Forrestal — let alone suffered five years of brutal torture — would make a prognosis of severe and continuing PTSD nearly inevitable.
Pundits have called Sen. McCain's body language during the first presidential debate "arrogant" and "dismissive." That's not how I saw it. To me, John looked like he was flinching away from a physical beating.
John McCain, canny and maneuvering senator, is a man I can respect. John McCain, captain USN (retired), is a veteran whose service I revere. President John McCain, commander in chief of the armed forces of the United States of America, is an administration I wish not to see.
John McCain's opponent, while coming out against the Iraq conflict (using a rationale of expense and difficulty that has since been vindicated many times over), has continuously voted to expand care for injured veterans. Thanks in part to Sen. Barack Obama's efforts, veterans have access to needed care for PTSD.
Veterans like myself, and veterans like John McCain.








Comments:
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 7:14 a.m. inappropriate
Still working for PSYOPS Jack?: Previous articles have always carried Jack's mini-bio at the end, citing his work in Iraq for the 361st PSYOPS team. Why was it excluded for this article? Are/Were you an Officer Jack? What rank? MFA from USC, Undergrad from WSU I would think so.
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 8:06 a.m. inappropriate
POP SCIENCE CONJECTURE: There are clearly reasons not to support McCain, this silly speculative appraisal is not one of them. This fellow needs to get a grip.
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 8:31 a.m. inappropriate
Jack Lewis deployed to Iraq in late 2004 with a detachment of Army Reserve soldiers in the 361st Psychological Operations Company. His scribbling experience includes a couple of hundred news and opinion pieces in small newspapers, for which he received a Society of Professional Journalists editorial writing award and the Darrell Bob Houston Journalism Prize. He can be reached here.
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 8:47 a.m. inappropriate
true?: If he has PTSD, or enough symptoms to raise the question, we need to know.
Obviously Obama and his surrogates can't ask the question, and much of the media wouldn't either.
Good article.
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 9 a.m. inappropriate
RE: POP SCIENCE CONJECTURE: My mother, a neuro-psychologist in Arizona whose been watching McCain for years and has a sub-specialty in PTSD mentioned it when he announced. It's not a new notion, and has been starting to gain some mention in smaller papers. Experts are starting to wonder, particularly following his erratic reaction to the credit 'crisis', and looking back at his record and saying it fits.
Given what we know of PTSD it would be very surprising if he did NOT have it. As noted, it's a purely adaptive reaction that is consistent for sufficient stress -- which five years of POW status qualifies as. It's not a weakness or a failing. It's how the brain survives certain kinds of circumstances, with POW right at the top of that list.
The issue at that point is only how well the person manages to work around it. Part of that is treatment to understand the changes to one's mind and personality, which we have no knowledge of either way. Part of it is avoiding places where it will be an issue -- POTUS is definitely such a place.
A man who calls his wife a cunt in front of reporters is clearly unable to control his temper sufficiently for international diplomacy. PTSD is actually the MOST sympathetic (and plausible) explanation for such outbursts.
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 9:06 a.m. inappropriate
I'm no longer with the USAR. I re-entered reserve service in 2003 at age 39 and did a stint with the 361st Psychological Operations Company (Tactical), followed by a year in the Guard with 1-19 SFG(A). Tactical PSYOP teams are led by team sergeants, not officers -- anyway, most who know me would tell you that I'm no gentleman.
Thanks for your comment.
Cheers,
Jack
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 10:29 a.m. inappropriate
What you write rings true---in fact, may all be valid. At the same time, McCain's growing up years, USNA years, and early Navy years all were
characterized by the same kind of behavior that has surfaced since he left the Hanoi Hilton. For whatever reason, he seems always to have been an excessive risk taker and gambler---literally, a high-stakes, gaming table gambler---and an impulsive, willful, and short-tempered guy.
I intend to write in Crosscut about the characters of both candidates in advance of the election. Clearly McCain's behavior is consistent with the syndrome. But it was his behavior before he ever became a POW.
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 11:13 a.m. inappropriate
huh?: So of all the former presidents that have gone to war, John is the only one that might have PTSD?
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 11:37 a.m. inappropriate
Jack is right on: As an Arizona native and resident I have observed John McCain since he moved to Arizona. I have never seen him take a positive stand on legislation helping ordinary people. I have gone to his Washington, DC Senate office many times regarding environmental and consumer issues. (His most notable achievement in the environmental field was the passage of legislation, avoiding a required NEPA process, exchanging valuable national forest land for water-short acreage owned by a physician/contributor friend of his in Scottsdale and Sedona).
His office has always been filled with tension and, often, McCain can be heard by those in the reception room raging at staff and others a door or two down.
His interactions with constituents never last more than a moment---especially on state issues. He has frequently been absent on votes affecting Arizona
interests.
Having been trained in abnormal psychology, I long ago concluded that McCain was a tightly wound top who at the least suffered from PTSD. His rages, frequent changes of mind, and rapidly shifting moods disqualify him in my judgment as a potential president. Most Arizonans have never regarded him as the hero his campaign proclaims him to be.
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 1:19 p.m. inappropriate
Thoughtful: Thanks for the unique perspective, Jack.
That said, I'm very tired of the "he didn't vote for" or "he voted against" claims by BOTH sides ... because 99.9% of the final votes (votes on the actual bill, not amendments that might or might not make it) are not on a SINGLE issue. There is no such thing anymore in Congress. Instead, Congress critters have to figure out if, in their minds, the good in a bill (which is usually hundreds of pages long and too often more than a thousand pages) outweighs the bad.
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 1:38 p.m. inappropriate
For a broader perspective, Disabled American Veterans gives Sen. McCain about a 20 percent rating for his votes on legislation that they consider important to their organization.
Details on Sen. McCain's veteran-voting record are available from the Washington Independent and other sources.
Cheers,
Jack
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 2:21 p.m. inappropriate
RE: huh? Indeed!: "So of all the former presidents that have gone to war, John is the only one that might have PTSD?"
Besides Dwight Eisenhower and Jack Kennedy, which presidents is the last 100 years have actually been at war? (And I don't know if Ike was ever under fire.)
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 4:11 p.m. inappropriate
RE: huh? Indeed!: Why restrict it to the last 100 years? But even if you do, Teddy Roosevelt was in the Spanish-American War; and Johnson, Nixon, Ford, and Bush Sr. were all in World War II.
Posted Mon, Oct 6, 4:14 p.m. inappropriate
Caesar in Vietnam: Did Roman Soldiers Suffer From PTSD?
Who: Aislinn Melchior
When: Tuesday, Nov. 11
Time: 4:30-5:30 p.m.
Where: Trimble Forum
Tickets: Free; no tickets required.
Post-traumatic stress disorder made its first appearance in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in 1980, partly as a result of the ongoing treatment of veterans from the Vietnam War. At the heart of my talk is the question of whether we can read the modern world back upon the Romans. Did the Romans suffer PTSD? And if they did not experience it, why didn't they? In short, what things might lead us to suspect that PTSD is a universal danger for combatants, and what things might suggest instead that it is a more recent phenomenon that has little relevance to the Roman experience?
Professor Aislinn Melchior will discuss some of the evidence pro and con on this matter and in the process will ponder a few of the many joys (and complexities) of relating past and present. The Magee address was established in honor of John B. Magee, Professor of Philosophy and Religion and a driving force in establishing a chapter of Phi Beta Kappa at the University of Puget Sound in 1986.