Randy Dorn and life after the WASL
New state schools Superintendent Randy Dorn won partly because he rode the coattails of this election’s big theme — change — into a race against a three-term incumbent, Terry Bergeson. But for Dorn and the voters, change in the supertendent’s race also had real meaning: significantly change or get rid of the Washington Assessment of Student Learning, the WASL. Let’s hope Dorn has the smarts and strength to go beyond just tweaking the thing and can actually do away with it.
Keep in mind that the WASL is not required by the federal No Child Left Behind Act (which is certain to be changed under President Obama). Some test is, but not necessarily the WASL. So Dorn has room to move and he can pick a test or tests that are fairer and better measure school quality and student accomplishment.
The door is now open to change the type of test from one that is based on a particular educational philosophy (the ultimate problem with the WASL and most tests of its ilk) to one that is content-based. At root, what’s wrong with the WASL is that it is designed in response to the dominant educational philosophy of the past 40 or so years — the “student-centered,” “discovery” learning that de-emphasizes content knowledge in favor of critical thinking. That's a short-hand description and a lot can be said about this approach, but what it amounts to is the contention that you can make profound decisions while looking at a spreadsheet in which every cell is blank.
To get away from this style of testing, Dorn should switch immediately at the high school level to the SAT subject tests (formerly the SAT IIs). These are good if not excellent content tests, as are the advanced placement (AP) tests. Such tests would provide a stunningly clear picture of what our high school graduates know. Imagine our high school kids taking four SAT subject tests: English Lit., U.S. History, Mathematics (choice of two levels), and one of three possible science tests, biology, chemistry, or physics. It would be a brand new but really old and traditional world of knowledge that you can bet Barack Obama mastered on his way through school.










Comments:
Posted Fri, Nov 7, 8:09 p.m. inappropriate
Amen to every word ! And while he's at it, sweep out most of the sorry individuals currently wasting tax dollars under the guise of working at the dept. of public instruction in Oly !
Posted Sat, Nov 8, 6:19 a.m. inappropriate
I have never understood, or seen a compelling argument, for Washington to develop its own testing program with all the attendant cost, time lost, and inherent problems with any new test, when there are long established, well researched and proven achievement tests available. In addition to the SAT IIs that Lilly mentions, there are the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills for the primary grades and the Iowa Tests of Educational Development for the secondary grades. These tests have been around for decades, have been exhaustively researched and are well proven. Further, they are certainly not the only ones out there that Bergeson could have chosen. That she did not is why I have twice voted for her opponent and am happy that she will be leaving.
Posted Mon, Nov 10, 1:18 p.m. inappropriate
Excellent piece, Dick. Nice to see you writing here. -- mm
Posted Tue, Nov 11, 12:19 p.m. inappropriate
I ask, if critical thinking does not involve content knowledge--and understanding the relationships of all of the items involved in a question--then what do you believe it entails? Understanding the extent of what students know is a good start for a tests performance but I've always heard that the WASL was intended to go beyond this, to include how the extent of a students knowledge is being put to use. This might be a bit much to ask for in a test but rote memorization always seems a bit short-sighted.