Olympia's kudzu of commissions
The Washington Policy Center emailed a link to a Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee report released Dec. 3 that makes recommendations about what to do with the state's out-of-control proliferation of boards and commissions (pdf). In fact, as the report indicates, tracking them all down is tough, let alone getting a handle of what they do. Or don't do.
The timing for some housecleaning is good, obviously, with the state facing an "ugly" $6 billionish hole for the next budget cycle. Hacking away at the kudzu of commissions won't save a lot of money up front — many members are volunteers — but it could help streamline government by getting rid of useless or duplicative groups, and bring a little more transparency. Plus, fewer meetings would save travel reimbursements. (Couldn't many of them do their business via email and remote conferencing anyway?)
The legislature has already determined there are too many boards and commissions, some 470, ranging from the Dry Pea and Lentil Commission and the Noxious Weed Control Board to the Public Disclosure Commission and the Board of Massage. Some do actual work overseeing public universities, watchdogging industry, advising policy makers, and licensing professionals from denturists to funeral directors. But together with various ad hoc committees and symbolic entities — not to mention groups created as a sop to various constituencies — getting a handle on them has been difficult.
The Office of Financial Management in Olympia is tasked with keeping tabs on many of the groups, but not all. And it appears that not all have been regularly reporting their activities, expenditures, and certainly not their obsolescence, according to the report. The state is unsure of exactly what rules and mandates all the various boards and commissions have. Oversight has not been systematic.
The report includes a list of 36 boards and commissions that report little activity to OFM. Are they moribund, or just not filing the paperwork on what they're up to? If you're on (to name but a few) the Apiary Advisory Committee, the Acupuncture Ad Hoc Consulting Group, Self Insurance Insolvency Trust Board, the Seed Arbitration Committee, or the Migratory Waterfowl Art Commission, you better send up a flare because that list invites closer scrutiny.
Putting together a comprehensive inventory of boards and commissions is a start. The report makes numerous recommendations for how to begin clearing the thicket, but even that will take manpower and one wonders if the budget will leave enough left to do the heavy pruning required to eventually bring order.
One could appoint a commission to do the work, perhaps. The Noxious Weed people might have the proper experience.








Comments:
Posted Fri, Dec 12, 6:56 a.m. inappropriate
OMB? Isn't that the agency that Governor Gregoire ignored when they reported the up coming Budget Deficit? I believe she said that she "Didn't believe in forecasts, If I did we would be looking at a 5 Billion Dollar Budget Deficit instead of a 3.2 Billion Dollar Deficit." Maybe we should get rid of OMB too, if the decision makers are not going to take their advise, why have them?
Posted Fri, Dec 12, 8:33 a.m. inappropriate
OMB is a federal agency. Knute refers to OFM.
Cameron's post is full of other misunderstandings.
Posted Fri, Dec 12, 9:05 a.m. inappropriate
And the Truth as well, right Jan? Didn't the Governor say she didn't believe the forecast during the campaign?
Posted Fri, Dec 12, 10:47 a.m. inappropriate
Sure, let's get rid of Washington State OMB. It's not doing anything for anyone. OFM, on the other hand, is a real agency that handles, analyzes and oversees every financial aspect of the executive branch of state government--all the agencies, public schools, and state assistance programs, from formulating the budget to monitoring expenditures and fund revenues--and it would be missed.
Posted Fri, Dec 12, 2:19 p.m. inappropriate
But apparently not trusted enough by our current Governor to be believed. Since we will not be changing Governors for another 4 years, then OFM should be
overhauled...right? Or are you suggesting that the Governor ignored professionals in her OFM for political reasons.
Posted Fri, Dec 12, 8:04 p.m. inappropriate
I don't know the quote you're referring to. I would be surprised to learn that Christine Gregoire doesn't trust OFM any longer--that's as broad a generalization as saying that she doesn't trust the Governor's Mansion any longer, or she doesn't trust I-5. That's what OFM is--a big hunk of the state's infrastructure when it comes to state government budgeting and accounting, and revenue forecasting. Whether she chose not to accept a particular forecast in a particular context is another question.
I'm not shocked by the suggestion that a political candidate might have political reasons for what she says during a campaign. That happens.
Posted Fri, Dec 12, 8:44 p.m. inappropriate
In other words she is liar and withheld information that was not favorable to her run for Governor. Sweet!
Posted Sat, Dec 13, 10:49 a.m. inappropriate
Why on earth would you be glad about that, if it were true?
Posted Sun, Dec 14, 9 a.m. inappropriate
It is true and that is now becoming obvious to even the most jaded Democrat sychophant. I hope you enjoy the consequences of re-electing the Governor.