We're here, we're godless, get used to it
President Barack Obama's inaugural speech was short, grim and eloquent, but one short passage gave me a jolt:
For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.
There is a good deal of truth in that, but the stunning thing was Obama's hat tip to "nonbelievers." I have never heard major political speech that acknowledged us; indeed, over the last couple of decades, speeches have generally turned more and more toward God. The common American appeal usually runs in favor of religious diversity, with the underlying assumption that we "all believe in God," we just differ on the details. For the first time, in an address prefaced by a sermon from pastor Rick Warren, no less, we "unbelievers," clunky and negative as that term is, were given our due.
With that, Obama rhetorically enfranchised a large percentage of the population. If you define "unbelievers" as only atheists, agnostics, secular humanists, nature worshippers, and those who describe themselves simply as "non religious," we make up roughly 12-15 percent of the U.S. population. That's a group as big as African Americans.
Atheism itself continues to be unpopular in the political mainstream. There is only one avowed "unbeliever" in Congress and Americans say they would not elect an atheist president.
Obama's acknowledgment is a far cry from George H.W Bush's infamous statement in 1987 that he doubted if "atheists should be considered citizens nor should they be considered patriots." The new president is not only inviting religious minorities inside the tent, he's saying they are an essential part of America's strength.









Comments:
Posted Thu, Jan 22, 8:24 a.m. inappropriate
True, that is refreshing!
Posted Thu, Jan 22, 9:19 a.m. inappropriate
The term non-believer was actually the only thing in the speech I'd quibble with. I'm not in any of those groups he named as believers, but I believe in a lot of things.
Posted Thu, Jan 22, 9:52 a.m. inappropriate
What about deists? It would be nice if the majority of our founding fathers could be welcomed back into the patriotic fold.
Posted Thu, Jan 22, 10:13 a.m. inappropriate
Many times during the last eight years I found myself thinking how much I disliked George H.W. Bush when he was president, and then trying to remember why. Surely he couldn't have been that bad, compared to his son. In fact, I remember thinking "man, I'd so much rather have H.W. in office right now, if I had to choose."
OK — so I'd still have had H.W. in office the last eight years than his son, but thank you, Knute, for reminding me one of the reasons I disliked him so when I was in high school.
Now, here's something interesting: "Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus and non-believers."
1) I wonder at which point the prevailing religious dichotomy in the U.S. switched from "Christians and Jews" to "Christians and Muslims"? 9/11? Earlier?
2) If you believe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_United_States, the actual ordering of religious preference in this country is Christian, unaffiliated, none, other/unspecified, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, Hindu, Unitarian Universalist, Sikh. I wonder why the speechwriters decided to mention Hindus and not Buddhists.
Posted Thu, Jan 22, 10:36 a.m. inappropriate
E.B. White wrote in 1956, after Pres. Eisenhower declared a National Day of Prayer: "Democracy, if I understand it at all, is a society in which the unbeliever feels undisturbed and at home. If there were only half a dozen unbelievers in America, their well-being would be a test of our democracy, their tranquillity would be its proof."
And in the same essay: "Democracy itself is a religious faith. For some it comes close to being the only formal religion they have. And so when I feel the first faint shadow of orthodoxy sweep across the sky, feel the first cold whiff of its blinding fog steal in from the sea, I tremble all over, as though I had just seen an eagle go by, carrying a baby."
Posted Thu, Jan 22, 10:57 a.m. inappropriate
What is it with Berger dropping prepositions? Or is the editor asleep at the switch?
Posted Thu, Jan 22, 12:27 p.m. inappropriate
Rick Warren offered a prayer, not a sermon.
Posted Thu, Jan 22, 12:32 p.m. inappropriate
Remember the line in Tom Robbins's immortal book, "Even Cowgirls Get the Blues," "I believe in everything, nothing is sacred! I believe in nothing, everything is sacred!" That line speaks for me. Obama speaks for the people. It's a new day, a new world. The long dark has ended!
Posted Thu, Jan 22, 3:17 p.m. inappropriate
It was Ike who added "under God" to the Pledge of Allegiance. It was downhill from there until Tuesday. Thanks for highlighting that important moment. It got my attention as it did yours.
Posted Thu, Jan 22, 4:11 p.m. inappropriate
From what I understand his mother was not a believer.
Posted Fri, Jan 23, 9:01 a.m. inappropriate
Here's a comment sent in by Doug MacDonald:
This was a powerful section of the speech. One other thing it contained was the direct message Obama sent as an African-American president, even a Kenyan-American president, to every corner of sub-Saharan Africa. And the message was surely heard by millions there as an entirely un-coded, very intentional and very dramatic call for the new ways of thinking: "we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve."
Posted Fri, Jan 23, 9:05 a.m. inappropriate
The term non-believer, when removed from its context of a religious discussion, is a meaningless term. "Do you believe yourself to be a non believer?" "Yes, I believe I am not a believer." Phftht! I wish there was a better word, for people for whom religion is not a part of their lives, than atheist. That word has been adopted by people who are actively antitheist, and it leaves no word to describe those who want nothing from religion than to be left alone.