Adding insult to injury
As the economic downturn begins to really settle in on Puget Sound, with large layoffs and cutbacks at mainstays like Microsoft, Boeing, and Starbucks, it's beginning to sink in that things are going to get worse for those struggling to make ends meet, not just the good citizens of Nickelsville.
In Seattle, some water and recycling fees are about to go up for many people. And the Seattle Times reports that there will be "no property tax relief" for homeowners in King County this year. Property owners will be paying more (the county-wide average increase is over 6 percent) because of a rash of measures passed last fall, from fixing up the Pike Place Market to schools and parks funding. There are also reports that people have been receiving major increases in their assessments despite the drop in the real estate market. Appeals of assessments are on the rise and seem out-of-sync with actual values.
The city is also pushing paid parking into more neighborhoods (like Fremont), counting on these revenue streams to cover its budget, but creating hardships for already pressed local retailers. In addition, talk of road tolling and congestion pricing is accelerating to pay for transportation projects. Ready or not, we're headed toward daily user fees for some of our most basic needs. February 1, Metro bumps up its bus fares(pdf), a peak-hour fare rising from $1.75 to $2.00. Wasn't the fare increase justified in part because of higher gas prices? It may not seem like much, it may even be worth it, but in a hard-pressed economy when local newspapers are offering front page advice how how to survive a depression, getting nickeled and dimed makes things that much harder.








Comments:
Posted Fri, Jan 30, 9:39 p.m. inappropriate
Compare apples to apples. Seattle's property taxes are not going up six percent.
Posted Sat, Jan 31, 2:59 p.m. inappropriate
Knute, neither the city nor the state can print money. For them (us) it is a zero
sum game; if the state decreases services it can lower taxes. The reverse is also true.
No Keynes for the locals. I usually think that is a good thing.
Posted Sat, Jan 31, 9:15 p.m. inappropriate
Michael is right; the original Seattle Times article and your post are misleading: the absolute amount of property taxes did go up, but the property-tax rate went down. Assessments are the reason that tax bills are up. Also, what do you propose as an alternative to these levies? Close more schools? Slash the public-safety budgets even more? Stop paving roads? Cut the Bridging the Gap program for buying more Metro service in Seattle? Would you keep Metro fares where they are, thereby causing the need to decrease Metro's budget? Offer a solution.
Posted Sat, Jan 31, 10:36 p.m. inappropriate
On further review, I got this partly wrong. Sorry. With a nudge from the King County Assessor's page (very helpful, at http://www.kingcounty.gov/Assessor/NewsReleases.aspx#jan292009), I now remember that assessments don't determine property-tax levels. Still, I think it's relevant that voters decided to raise the levy lids because they apparently value the services promised---more parks, a renovated Pike Place Market, etc. And the question remains: What services would you cut? Back to my thrilling Saturday evening...
Posted Mon, Feb 2, 2:01 p.m. inappropriate
What do you propose as an alternative to these levies?
No more taxes - period.
Close more schools?
Maybe. Make them all "neighborhood" schools so that parents can be more involved. End busing.
Slash the public-safety budgets even more?
Yes.
Stop paving roads?
Nope. Build more. We can by making transit fares realistic.
Cut the Bridging the Gap program for buying more Metro service in Seattle?
Why not?
Would you keep Metro fares where they are, thereby causing the need to decrease Metro's budget?
No. Transit fares need to increase to the point where the system is self-sufficient and paid for with fares. More roads could then be built and neglected infrastructure repaired.
.