Greg Smith decides not to run for mayor
Greg Smith, the green developer who seriously explored running against Mayor Greg Nickels this year, has decided against making the challenge. But he says he will keep working to see that there is a good challenger and a good debate in the fall election, when Nickels will be seeking his third term.
Smith said his decision was based on an "ethical need" to tend to his business at a time when "things are bad and getting worse," and he has obligations to his investor partners. Smith's company, Urban Visions, develops and sells major projects in downtown Seattle. He lives in the handsomely renovated old Cobb Building downtown, a project by Unico.
The developer, an erstwhile ally of Mayor Nickels, grew estranged over differences about how to develop properties around the stadiums and the south end of downtown. He says he still believes "we need a great candidate" to challenge Nickels and will be meeting with former City Councilmember Peter Steinbrueck "and other good candidates" to help in the coming campaign. Smith admitted that his own political chances were somewhat harmed by his being from downtown, not the neighborhoods, and being a developer, albeit one specializing in energy-efficient green buildings.
Smith, whose great grandfather was a mayor of Seattle in the 1870s, has long nursed desires to be mayor someday. He hasn't closed the door for future races, saying his decision to pass on the race this year meant "not this time."
Meanwhile, Steinbrueck continues to be intrigued about running, as does City Councilmember Nick Licata. Another Councilmember, Tim Burgess, has closed the door but not locked it to a draft. Mike McGinn, a Sierra Club member and organizer of the Great Cities initiative, is said to be interested. The race is shaping up much later than usual, but with Nickels facing low approval ratings, it is likely that a candidate with a good name who runs a moderately financed but smart campaign could still win.









Comments:
Posted Sat, Feb 14, 7:34 a.m. inappropriate
David--
I think you overstate Nickel's vulnerability. The polls reflect the general dark mood of the electorate, not just Nickel's stumbles. It's going to take an energetic challenger with sufficient funds to beat him. Steinbrueck and Licata do not fit that bill. Who out there does? We should be more intrigued by the city council races where voter disenchantment might really express itself. Holmes, Donaldson, Killian, O'Brien, Bloom and others signal real hope for change. This lousy dynamic between the council and the mayor needs to change.
Posted Sat, Feb 14, 10:08 a.m. inappropriate
Mikos makes a very interesting point, and I think he indicates a possible direction for the 2009 races. It would go this way: Grant Nickels another term, since he's probably too entrenched to defeat and there is nobody out there promising to do much better. Then focus the reform efforts on the City Council, hoping both for a more coherent Council that can win a few battles with the Mayor, and for a stronger, more liberal/populist voice from the Council to get us through the hard times.
My problem with this scenario is that the Council is always going to be pretty fractured and therefore not a real match for the Mayor (even if a somewhat better opponent). And Council election dynamics tend to favor the kind of names on Mikos's list, drawn from the discontented parts of the spectrum with a pet issue or two per member. That kind of politics would further isolate Seattle from the region and the Legislature. And that kind of politician tends to end up with a lot of anger, a few votes on their favorite (lost-cause)issues, and more impasse politics.
Politically, Seattle is at a crossroads. One road leads to more anger and more left causes, newly radicalized by the climate-change and deep-recession issues. The other leads to more allies and more working together for regional solutions. You never lose in Seattle by betting on the former.
Posted Sun, Feb 15, 9:16 p.m. inappropriate
If we are waiting for Steinbrueck, we are a very sad city.