Vancouver Sun writer Douglas Todd is appalled at the latest Darwin numbers from Canada which show that the theory of evolution is not exactly being embraced in the Great White North:
The Canadian school system is failing to properly educate citizens about evolutionary theory — especially about the diversity of evolutionary theory. With all the media attention given last week to Charles Darwin's 200th birthday and the 150th anniversary of the release of his earth-shattering Origin of Species, you would think evolution would now be embedded in the Canadian psyche.
But it turns out Canadians are almost as ignorant as Americans about evolution. An Angus Reid poll recently showed that only 58% of Canadian accept the well-tested theories of evolution based on Darwin's research.
A whopping 24% of Canadians told pollsters they believe in Creationism, which translates as the belief the Biblical God supernaturally created the world 6,000 years ago. In other words, such people believe humans once walked with dinosaurs. (Maybe I need to say the obvious: The vast majority of scientists say this is NOT true.)
"Almost as ignorant" as Americans? Sorry, Doug. Americans win again. Polls prove that Americans are even more ignorant than Canadians. Which is cool because America is number one — even at being dumb!
A new Gallup survey reveals that only 39% of Americans believe in the theory of evolution. That's 20 points below Canada.
And you think 24% of Canadians believing in Creationism is "whopping?" Think again, loser! According to a new Pew Research poll, 44% of Americans think the world was created by God in six days, just like the Bible says, and that all life passed into existence about 10,000 years ago, just like in the Flintstones. Again, a 20-point winning margin.
And America's prowess at ignorance is even more impressive than that, however. Among U.S. college graduates, only 55% believe in evolution, which is still less than Canada's overall overage of 58%. In other words, even our elite is out of it. You think you educational system stinks? Hah, eat our dust!
And it gets even better. It turns out, according to Pew polling, that some pretty large chunks of American citizenry don't really know what either evolution and Creationism are, even when pollsters explain it to them in detail. Get this: 26% of Americans think evolution and Creationism are both true.
According to Pew:
Most Americans say they are familiar with creationism and evolution, but recent polling suggests that there is some confusion about the meaning of these terms. In an August 2005 Gallup poll, 58% of the public said that creationism was definitely or probably true as an explanation for the origin and development of life, but about the same number also said the same about evolution. Since creationism and evolution are incompatible as explanations, some portion of the public is clearly confused about the meaning of the terms.
A 1999 Fox News poll of registered voters offered respondents the explicit option to say that both Darwin's theory of evolution and the biblical account of creation were true: 26% said both were. More recently, a July 2005 Pew Research Center poll found that a substantial 35% minority of those who accept creationist accounts of life's origins nonetheless oppose removing the teaching of evolution in public schools in favor of teaching creationism; 14% of those who accepted natural selection favored teaching creationism instead of evolution.
It's good to know that the Great American Peckerwood still lives and is kicking Canadian butt.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email





Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Wed, Feb 18, 1:45 p.m. Inappropriate
This does sound appalling, but on the other hand I'm not sure a belief in creationism is incompatible with a belief in scientific theories of evolution. They're only in conflict if both beliefs must be literal. Personally I'd probably be in that confusing margin if I had been polled, because I believe there's truth to the Biblical creation story, but mythological truth as opposed to materialistic literalism. Scientific theories of evolution, on the other hand, are not offering deep spiritual or mythological meaning and are not really made to be believed; they're made to be accepted in a spirit of empirical skepticism as more or less accurate models for how the material world works. Maybe some of the people polled have a similarly complicated way of putting Darwin and Genesis together in their minds.
Posted Thu, Feb 19, 5:25 a.m. Inappropriate
Putting some spirit into science is more appropriate than going around calling people ignorant.
Creation, whether by evolution or the hand of god is a pretty incredible thing worthy of wide eyed uncomprehending wonder - irregardless of how much cold science we have.
Using science to determine that everyone that doesn't agree with you is trash is tricky business. But then again, using religion to that same end is also problematic.
Posted Thu, Feb 19, 9:52 a.m. Inappropriate
The problem with these polls is that the word "evolution" means different things to different people. To some, it means evolution within a species, on which the scientific evidence is firm. For others it means evolving from one kind of animal into another, on which the fossil evidence is scant. I don't think that raising critical questions about evolution between species makes you hostile to science any more than supporting evolution makes you hostile to religion or the idea of God. After all, it all began with a cell, and no one knows how that cell originated.
Posted Thu, Feb 19, 4:51 p.m. Inappropriate
I agree with the other posters -- evolution and God as the source of the beginning of existence are not mutually exclusive concepts. In fact, I find the companion of them quite logical. Conversely, how does an athiest evolutionist explain where the molecules for the Big Bang came from? If it's from nowhere, then I find that illogical.
Knute's point about the number of people rejecting evolution is well taken (although calling them dumb undermines himself). It makes you wonder about the question that was posed in the first place (think of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy where the answer was 42 -- but what was the question?). Upon deeper questioning and review, would the number of evolutionists be higher? I wonder if the question is simply threatening to certain Christians (Although it certainly isn't universally a Christian stance. My belief stated above came from my Catholic education.).
Posted Thu, Feb 19, 11:12 p.m. Inappropriate
If you read the post for meaning, you'll note that Creationism is identified as the biblical theory of creation. That is a creation in six days, 10k years ago. That's very different from simply saying that the whole of creation had a spiritual/divine spark.
Posted Thu, Apr 2, 11:38 a.m. Inappropriate
Wow! Graduating the least number per capita of hard science degrees of the top 26 countires in the world is beginning to make sense!
I think the free market folks had a plan with reducing education to the bare minimum. We need soldiers for our $623 billion dollars invested in the military and they don't have to be too smart. When things are pushed in a general direction for any length of time you need to look for the "unseen hand" that is directing them down that path before attempting a solution. Better schools/teachers would happen if we cut military spending and then the better educated could find new business besides things that go BOOM! and pull us out and keep us out of our current crisis.....
Just a thought. I could be wrong.