Writer Sandra Tsing Loh is a treat: smart, funny, surprising in her unexpected soft moments that pop up between the sharp jabs. Her piece "Class Dismissed: A new status anxiety is infecting affluent hipdom," in the March issue of the Atlantic is tasty literary candy. (I found it this morning thanks to a nudge from Portland Mercury blogger Alison Hallett.)
Loh revisits Paul Fussell’s "Class: A Guide Through the American Status System," some 25 years after its debut, and from the first, she hits just the right pitch, refreshing our memories of the work, and allowing those of us who never read Fussell to pretend like we did:
For readers who somehow missed this snide, martini-dry American classic, do have your assistant Tessa run out and get it immediately (Upper [class]), or at least be sure to worriedly skim this magazine summary over a low-fat bagel (Middle [class]), because Fussell’s bibelot-rich tropes still resonate.
One of the observations Loh makes is this one:
In the relatively affluent post–Cold War era, the search for self-expression has evolved into a desire to not have that self-expression challenged, which in turn necessitates living among people who think and feel just as you do. It’s why so many bohemians flee gritty Los Angeles for verdant Portland, where left-leaning citizens pride themselves on their uniform, monotonously progressive culture—the Zipcars, the organic gardens, the funky graphic-novel stores, and the thriving alternative-music scene. (In the meantime, I’ve also noticed that Portland is much whiter than Los Angeles, disconcertingly white.)
It should be noted that this is a minor point in Loh's essay, but it triggered the usual mental squirm I feel when this point is made, and remained stuck to my brain like a tiny Post-It as I read on.
Yes, Portland is, as a young friend of mine says, way white, less than 7 percent is African American. This always throws off outsiders from bigger cities, who visit here (or move here in the sort of sudden pack-up-and-start-over swoop that Portland still inspires) and fall for the hip, young, relatively affordable Rose City. A place where you can be taken seriously as a writer even when you spend 30 hours a week as a barista or retail clerk at an age when all your friends elsewhere are eyeing retirement.
Periodically someone writing from elsewhere in the world notices that the city's diversity is more geographic than anything else. I don't need to look up any stats to know that a large chunk of the local population has transplanted here. Proof is the unusually large number of license plates from other states, including an inordinate share from New England. It's as if Portland has a magnetic pull that reaches across the country and grabs cars. Well, cars driven by white people. White people who don't bother to register their cars until they've lived here for two years.
Still, I feel defensive every time I read another one of these observations about our lack of color. I've got my share of irritating garden-variety white-liberal guilt, but this is something different. Flat statements about the whiteness of Portland are accurate, but dismiss the vibrant black community that is here. Those observations ignore the uphill battle the first black Portlanders faced, long before the city traded its working-stiff nature for the present navel-gazing ethos.
African American families who go way back in this town have ancestors who bucked some remarkable historic trends. Oregon came to statehood with a clause that barred blacks from living here; that was one way to avoid that messy slave debate and keep jobs safe for white immigrants. This city that prides itself on equal rights for bikers is in a state that didn't give blacks the vote until 1959. (For more on this history, check out the excellent piece by Gosia Wozniacka that ran earlier this month in the Oregonian.)
Knowing this racist history won't ease the "disconcerting" feeling Loh describes, it might worsen it for some. To me, though, it is reason to bristle when an outsider points to our pale city, and leaves it at that.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email





Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Thu, Feb 19, 9:06 a.m. Inappropriate
Kimberly, the comments about whiteness really extend throughout the Northwest, and this one major reason that our ``progessiveness'' really seems more like an affectation than reality. It's telling that the only parts of Washington and Oregon that are truly diverse are the Yakima and Columbia valleys of Washington, where the minority population is around 50 percent and climbing. Yet these areas are considered the height of un-hipness in this region. Diversity for many people here seems to mean having white, black and middle eastern software engineers sitting next to each other at Microsoft, rather than the real thing. Nick Geranios
Posted Thu, Feb 19, 9:46 a.m. Inappropriate
I had to laugh at the notion of the Yakima and Columbia valleys being "truly diverse." I grew up in that area, and the only thing diverse about it is the high Hispanic population. When I was a child, the migrant workers - and they truly were migratory at that time, following the crops - were comprized of Poor White Trash and Native Americans. Over time, that began to change. Some of the white folks settled there; others moved on. I still wonder what happened to my "once a year" friend Debbie whose family was last known to have switched over to traveling carnivals. Mexicans assumed the migratory role, then as things changed further it wasn't migratory any more. The use of the word "diversity" suggests an appreciation of cultural differences that simply doesn't exist there, except perhaps through the optimistic lens of a westsider. There is active racism in those areas; people resent the Mexicans even as they rely on them for labor.
A year ago I was contacted by a black friend of a friend who was considering moving to Portland, but who was put off by the Census stats. In putting together some information for her, I focused on inclusiveness using many different indicators. Despite the poor ethnic mix, I perceived there was a far better degree of inclusiveness than has ever developed in Central Washington.
Posted Thu, Feb 19, 11:10 a.m. Inappropriate
Nick, what is "the real thing"? What is "truly diverse"?
Washington may have a lower percentage of blacks than in the U.S. as a whole, but the figures for Native Americans and Asians are higher than the national average. In Seattle, the Asian percentage is far higher.
I wonder if "diverse" is being used as a synonym for "black" or "non-white." I don't know what the figures for the Yakima and Columbia Valleys are, but I wonder what the figures for Native Americans, Asians, and blacks are there, or if the "minority" population is mostly Hispanic.
Posted Thu, Feb 19, 12:52 p.m. Inappropriate
When I use the term diversity, I am speaking about people from different ethnic, racial and socio-economic backgrounds. Debbalee seems to be operating from an outdated view of central Washington, which in the 2010 census will become majority-minority. That is diversity. I'm not sure how ``inclusiveness'' can be measured, and what it really means anyway.
Benjamin, the largest minority group in central Washington is Hispanic, mostly from southern Mexico, and there are lots of Native Americans because the Yakima and Colville reservations are there. The black and Asian population reflects Northwest averages.
Posted Thu, Feb 19, 1:10 p.m. Inappropriate
I think what's disconcerting about the whiteness of livable/funky areas like Portland is what it says about progressive white people's willingness, collectively, to take the fast route toward livability - and leave behind their POC (not just black) brothers and sisters in the process. It's easier to avoid systemic inequities than to face them. A few people above have brought up the explicit, written-into-law exclusion of people of color from certain areas - laws on the books not 50 years ago. What does it meant to be a progressive white person and move into cheap areas of town that used to be the only areas *legal* for POC. As a *progressive*, if that's what you want to be, what is your responsibility? The lack of awareness of this gentrification dynamic while simultaneously claiming *progressive* is what's disconcerting. White progressives not seeing the decidedly non-progressive role they are unwittingly playing as they pursue a lifestyle that does not explicitly ally with concerns of their local POC brothers and sisters. No one said progressive was easy.
Posted Thu, Feb 19, 2:12 p.m. Inappropriate
It could be because Portland is built on an ancient unicorn burial ground:
http://zehnkatzen.blogspot.com/2009/02/in-memory-of-unicorns.html
Unicorns tend to encourage this sort of behavior.
Posted Thu, Feb 19, 4:40 p.m. Inappropriate
yawn
Posted Fri, Feb 20, 1:43 a.m. Inappropriate
Portland's pretty white, yeah. And Atlanta's pretty black. But people always make individual decisions about where to live. All those dang whities moving to Portland, making it ever whiter: umm, should they move to Philadelphia instead? Cleveland? Dallas? Why do you live where you do? Probably lots of reasons. Although I was born in Seattle, I've lived in Portland since late 2001 (after a 2 year stint in Reno.) I didn't (consciously) move here because it is even whiter than Seattle. I moved here because a couple of my friends already had and I just figured what the heck. It turned out to be a place full of people doing amazing and ground-breaking things. "Cultural Creatives" and all that. But that's just someone else's handy label. As for writers like Sandra Tsing Loh (and she's not the only one): it is just lazy to be smugly critical of a place full of things like "Zipcars, the organic gardens, the funky graphic-novel stores, and the thriving alternative-music scene". The implication of her tone is that... what? these things are bad? We'd be better off just buying our vegetables and music at Wal-Mart rather than making both for ourselves?
No place is perfect, but who does it serve to offer superficial criticism of a place where people (yes, even Black, Asian, and Hispanic people) are concretely working to create viable, real-life alternatives to the walking-dead collossus of mainstream culture?
Posted Fri, Feb 20, 7:48 a.m. Inappropriate
danreedmiller: Good points, all. I do think, though, that Loh was using humor and some satiric smugness (your word and a good one here) to make her point. It was probably lost somewhat by my quoting just a small bit of her piece, but she constructed a view that is not wholly different than yours in the end. We choose where to live for many different reasons, some of them influenced by what we call class. How the class distinctions are described (and ridiculed) says something about the times we live in, and those descriptions have changed significantly in the 25 years she refers to. Her tone is not so much that of a scold as it is wry. In any event, thanks for the thoughtful response.
Posted Fri, Feb 20, 12:07 p.m. Inappropriate
A few years ago, I spent a couple of months at OHSU's Bone Marrow Transplant Center.
Although I have visited and worked in Portland for a few decades, I hadn't realised how white it was-until I was bombarded by the sight of the other patients being predominately white, made more noticable by the decided color comparison of the health care workers in the bottom tier.
Even Sandra Sing Loh's signature smugness can't compare with Portlanders
who insist on driving north in their Volvos and telling anybody here who doesn't wear Birks how to live.
Posted Sat, Feb 21, 10:25 a.m. Inappropriate
A reader who prefers to email CC writers instead of posting, sent this:
"Your blog reminded me of living in Portland for 10 years as part of an inter-racial couple. It was interesting….actually, less reaction here than when we were in Oakland, where folks could be down right ugly. Portland may be very white, but lucky for us, also pretty passive. That’s not as good as 'inclusive' perhaps, but there are worse places to be if you’re in the ethnic minority in one way or another."