As a reporter, I always try to imagine what questions my audience might have. In the case of the state budget crisis, the two obvious questions seem to be: what are lawmakers going to cut and what might a tax hike package look like? Good luck getting a straight answer to either question.
Now, I didn’t just fall off the turnip truck. I know that politics dictates that politicians not reveal their strategic plans to the opposition party, voters or, God forbid, reporters. Nonetheless, the state is in a crisis and there’s a big lack of straight-talking going on in Olympia.
On the tax question, here’s what we know. Stakeholder groups who have a lot to lose from budget cuts are meeting to discuss possible tax package ideas. These are ideas that will be brought to the Democratic leadership in the Legislature — namely Speaker of the House Frank Chopp, D-Seattle and Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown, D-Spokane.
“There are serious discussions going on,” confirms Randy Revelle at the Washington State Hospital Association. But when pressed for details, Revelle referred me to Chopp and Brown — both of whom are steadfast in saying it’s too early to talk about taxes because decisions first need to be made about what to cut. I also asked Rebecca Kavoussi, with the Community Health Network of Washington, about meetings to discuss taxes. Her response: “No comment.” She added that I was probably getting a lot of no comments these days. She’s right. Clearly there’s a conspiracy to keep reporters (and therefore the public) in the dark.
Joe Turner of the Tacoma News Tribune recently blogged that: “the shadow legislature of unions and other stakeholders is … holding ‘focus groups’ in communities” to figure out what kinds of taxes and how a big a tax the public might be willing to vote for later this year.
So, if they don’t want to talk about taxes — what about budget cuts? The projected deficit has now swelled to more than $8 billion. Majority Democrats have done an early round of belt-tightening. But so far they’re mum about the big cuts that are coming. Yes, they’ll speak in generalities and they’re telling the public to brace for the worst. But wringing any details out of them about what’s being considered behind closed doors — and they do a lot of closed door meeting in Olympia — is a fruitless exercise at this point. Minority Republicans also refuse to talk about their suggestions for big ticket cuts. Why become a lightning rod if you don’t have to?
To be fair, we do have Gov. Chris Gregoire’s December budget proposal as a roadmap for what’s coming. And we still haven't reached the midpoint of the 105-day session, so lawmakers are still getting their arms around the budget problem. Clearly big decisions haven’t yet been made. But for now Democrats are waiting to have a frank, public conversation with voters about specifically what's on the chopping block and what taxes might be proposed.
Of course, all of these questions and more will be answered in good time — on legislative time. We will find out what lawmakers and stakeholder groups have been working on in secret. In the meantime, reporters like me will keep working to find out what’s happening behind closed doors.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email





Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Sat, Feb 21, 12:16 p.m. Inappropriate
So much for transparency in Government policy making. We already know that the current Governor and Legislature don't have a plan or a clue how to form a plan. We are not seeing any leadership out of Olympia these days.
Austin, watching your interview with McIntire gave me little hope that we will have any pressure from the Treasurer's office to cut anything, he seems eager to go into deficit spending mode.
Posted Sat, Feb 21, 2:50 p.m. Inappropriate
The state now has two key parts it needed to make significant progress; the federal stimulus package, and a new budget forcast.
I expect there is a big shell game going on right now swapping federal dollars for state planned expenditures where they can. What is diffferent this time around is how late in the session, and to what degree the horse trading with the lobbyists, uh, stakeholders is taking place.
They are burning valuable session time getting their story straight.
Posted Sat, Feb 21, 3:19 p.m. Inappropriate
Secrets are generally kept by people trying to control things.
Open process is what people expect from DC and Olympia.
DC is at least trying.
Governments that project secrecy, as opposed to reasonable transparency, have hard time passing tax measures.
Posted Sat, Feb 21, 5:58 p.m. Inappropriate
Ah "stakeholders." Like most political words suddenly on everyone's lips, it has an interesting beginning and a quite common end--these words all seem to wind up enabling exactly what the concept was invented to preclude. "Transparency" is a less advanced (newer one), so let's stick with "stakeholders."
Insightful citizens noticed that dialogues were taking forever because not everyone with a piece to the puzzle was at the table Then earnest agencies like the initial Seattle Department of Neighborhoods (DON) and environmental groups (just prior to certainty bouncing the scientific method) began to train folks in the ways of John McKnight (the community organizing guru Obama--the one who reversed Alinksy's "needy demands" into self-initiated community searches for it's own unrecognized talents). For those of us introduced to McKnight by DON n the early days of neighborhood planning, long before we knew of Obama, the big question is now that Obama has the power he saw was essential, will he stay true to his inspiration or go the way of these words invented by insightful citizens.
As for the locals, no one is beyond hope, but it's sure seems hopeless:
-sit down with lobbyists and an interest group or two but call the process "focus group" meetings with "stakeholders,"
-set comment and appeal deadlines at inconvenient times, e.g. Christmas Eve,
-give lobbyists and staff 3/4 of the hearing time so as to reduce that nonsense of citizen testimony to one minute each,
-then as last resort, if necessary, call a real stakeholders meeting when everyone's nose is so out that consensus is out of the question, freeing up adoption of more-of-the-same.
If I sound like I am exaggerating, you've probably been skipping out on some of your civic duty lately. Who'd blame you.
Posted Sat, Feb 21, 6:01 p.m. Inappropriate
"guru OF Obama," sorry.
Posted Sat, Feb 21, 7:59 p.m. Inappropriate
Tax increase,really is anyone surprised?this is what happens when you keep electing the same idiots over and over you get what you vote for!!!
Posted Sun, Feb 22, 8:07 p.m. Inappropriate
Freeman,
I have been doing my civic duty, and the result has been exactly as you delineate. When the bureaucracy really wants to mess with you, they split the real citizen stakeholders into "discussion" groups, have them write commentary on big white paper sheets, and then file all the comments into round file never never land. They then do whatever their shadow stakeholder group has already decided is in their own best interests, and their best interests can be guaranteed to be not in the neighborhood/ community's best interest ( and "community" has been debauched as a meaningful term too). A bad taste in the mouth hardly describes the feeling.
Posted Mon, Feb 23, 2:38 p.m. Inappropriate
Mr Jenkins -
Thanks for the piece. The most painful, exasperating part of this discussion is that tax revenues are actually expected to INCREASE next fiscal year compared to this fiscal year. That's right --- both revenues and expenses are going up.
Here's a solution --- don't cut anything. Hold state expenses FLAT during the next fiscal year. If revenues increase, as expected, there is no budget problem.