The story of the 19th century sailing schooner Wawona is a tale of maritime success and failure. An early catalyst in Seattle historic preservation and the creation of Northwest Seaport, the Wawona has been a symbol of Northwest seagoing heritage and our aspirations to honor and save the region's great vessels. Since a half century ago, preservationists have rallied around the Wawona to keep her afloat and raise funds to restore her.
It became evident last year, however, that the Wawona was doomed. Age and rot had taken their toll and the price tag for restoration was too high. Even though she is on the National Register, no deep-pocketed patron could be found to fix her up and the city regarded her a liability. Instead of making the schooner a prominent part of the new South Lake Union park, it was decided that she would be studied and documented by scholars; some salvageable parts would be kept for possible museum or exhibit display, and the rest junked.
That time has come. The Wawona will be moved to Lake Union Dry Dock on March 2 and dismantled. An ignominious end for the ship so many loved and tried to save, but not unusual for old vessels whose carcasses have often wound up decaying on beaches and tide flats. She'll rejoin that great Pacific fleet in the hereafter, leaving behind a fascinating history and a richer maritime preservation movement, but also the sense that Seattle let her down.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email





Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Mon, Feb 23, 4:13 p.m. Inappropriate
As a former resident of Seattle and a former member of the Center for Wooden Boats, I cannot begin to express my anger over this news...Remember when NW Seaport gave away the steam ferry San Mateo...One critic likened it to burying the body after a botched operation...Ditto for here...Northwest Seaport can bury another!
While California saved near sister ship C A Thayer...
Best
Rep. Steven W Lindsey
Ches-3
Keene, NH 03431
SteveLindsey60@hotmail.com
PS---At the very least, they could have scuttled the Wawona in Lake Washington with dignity... Wawona could have lived on as a dive site...Where divers could appreciate her lines... Wawona deserved better than scrapping!
Posted Mon, Feb 23, 4:22 p.m. Inappropriate
Sorry, but more thoughts on Wawona's demise... I tried submitting letters to Seattle's two dailies, but like many reactionary Southern state dailies, they refuse to publish letters from "away." No wonder these "guardians" of Seattle's marketplace of ideas are dying...One scheduled to close shortly...Had they remainded relevant...And taken strong editorial stances...Like the Toledo Blade sticking up for the steamer Willis Boyer...:(
Another fight to save a tall ship is Hawaii's effort to save the Falls of Clyde...See info published before island residents rallyed for the ship: http://www.preservationnation.org/magazine/911/falls-of-clyde-1.html
Shame on you Seattle for being such a poor steward.
Posted Mon, Feb 23, 6:33 p.m. Inappropriate
Disassemble it and put a few disjointed pieces in stuffy museums????? Ffget it. There is plenty of land is SLU Park. Leave it assembled and "dry dock" it where people can experience life aboard in the elements. I remember well a visit a couple of years ago. It was nice that it rocked, but not necessary. May need to design some fanciful cover--a good conservation corp endeavor for unemployed building industry. Disney makes these things of whole cloth and people flock. We toss the last of the real thing?
Posted Mon, Feb 23, 7:04 p.m. Inappropriate
I cannot believe that Seattle has done it again. As the past and final Executive Director of the Kalakala Foundation, and a champion for historic preservation in general, it makes me want to vomit with anger.
For a city who owes it 's very existence to the Maritime world, the lack of leadership and sensitivity, idiotic paper pushers and nincomepoops are allowed to destroy our heritage, wholesale and without remorse.
When will we learn to put people into office who care about Seattle and it's unique heritage. After all, that's all that makes us unique.
The dunderheads who pursue globalization, world class everything have systematically they have implemented a maritime heritage holocaust.
Whet more can I say to get my point across?
DO NOT REELECT ONE OF THE INCUMBENTS THAT ARE SEEKING REELECTION THIS FALL. Start the revolution NOW.
We should take down 10 incumbants for every ship that is or has been lost. That also includes the County. Another bunch of do-nothings.
I have spent forty years of my life fighting for the retention of our heritage. While some may differ on individual fights, they know where the rubber hits the road.
To the hundreds of volunteers over the years who have tried so valiently to preserve the Wawona, I salute you. And I cry with you for this incredible loss.
Perhaps the person who said she should be towed out to sea and sunk has the most nobel idea. Let her go down with dignity and purpose, just as she was created. Give her one last look at the sea she was born to plow through. Let her take her grief to the bottom of the sound where she will be, at least, with the marine world to the end. If she won't float, barg her their. Someone please make this happen!
Sorrowfully,
Arthur M. Skolnik FAIA
Posted Tue, Feb 24, 7:52 a.m. Inappropriate
I too have been a member of The Center for Wooden Boats, buoyed up one of their craft and helped document the Kalakala rescue for the Seattle Times. But I don't share the untempered zeal for the Wawona, which I find a large, very rotten distraction from more realistic efforts. Such efforts include the Center's programs and a very nice fleet of local historic vessels like the schooners Zodiac, Martha, Adventuress and the Virginia V passenger ferry. The $30 million needed to restore Wawona could float all these boats in perpetuity. So drink a toast to Wawona, then seek out one of our many seaworthy vessels and have a nice ride.
Posted Tue, Feb 24, 8:55 a.m. Inappropriate
On drydocked vessels...This has been done with success with other wooden vessels deemed to costly to keep in seaworthy shape. Consider the Fram in Oslo, Norway; or the St. Roche in Vancover. Visit the websites and see for yourselves.
Best
Rep. Steve Lindsey
Ches-3
Keene, NH
Below is a letter I sent to the P-I(unpublished at this time.)
Keep Wawona, Disband Seaport
I protest with anger the impending demise of the lumber schooner Wawona. If allowed, it would the second time a charge of the Northwest Seaport was lost.
When I left Seattle two decades ago, the seaport was then divesting itself the historic steam ferry San Mateo. One critic at the time likened Northwest Seaport to a doctor burying the body after a botched operation. So it is again with the Wawona.
Disband the North Seaport for its record of failure instead. Farfetched dear reader? Maybe. But consider this. In 1911, the US Supreme Court ordered Standard Oil Corporation broken up as its existence was deemed to run counter the public good.
I would argue that Northwest Seaport, after losing two of the Great Northwest’s two most historic vessels, should be disbanded. Dare we trust this “steward” with what little remains of our maritime heritage?
Sincerely
Rep. Steven W. Lindsey
Ches-3
Keene, NH 03431
Note to editor: Steven W Lindsey is a former resident of Seattle as well as a former crewmember of the steamer Virginia V, and is a NH state representative. He has worked on historic vessels USCGC Westwind, USCGC Northwind, the M/S Mount Washington and Seattle icebreaker USCGC Polar Sea. He is an avid preservationist.
SteveLindsey60@hotmail.com Word count: 144
Posted Tue, Feb 24, 9:11 a.m. Inappropriate
And, if she'd been drydocked, there'd have been a chance to get her back in the water at some point -- that's what happened to Charles W. Morgan, the last existing wooden whaling ship in the US. She was in several drydocks for a while -- one in New Bedford, and one in Rye, NY, where she was a "pirate ship," if I remember correctly -- until she could be saved, REFLOATED, and properly cared for by an organization and a community that recognizes the importance of maritime history.
The state of maritime heritage in the Northwest is such a disaster. Look at the Odyssey "Discovery Center" (note that they don't want to be a museum), the Puget Sound Maritime Heritage Center (they stupidly passed on an opportunity to set up shop at SLU a number of years ago, trying instead -- unsuccessfully, I think -- to set up a museum at Fisherman's Terminal), etc., etc. In fact, don't blame Center for Wooden Boats -- they don't own Wawona; Northwest Seaport does. CWB does what they do, and they do it well.
There's such a hodge-podge of organizations that no one knows what anyone is doing, and no one does anything as a result. It's a mess, and the loss of the Wawona is just an excellent symbol for it all.
Posted Tue, Feb 24, 10:29 a.m. Inappropriate
Below is another letter, to the Seattle Times. (Upublished at the time of this entry.)
---Steve Lindsey
See:
Feb 24, 2009
To: The Seattle Times
From: Steve Lindsey
Re: Letter to the editor
Keep Wawona
Seattle is about to lose it’s last working schooner, the Wawona. Deemed an eyesore, the hulk is to broken up. A few symbolic parts will be saved for a so-called tribute to built on Lake Union.
Why have others succeeded whereas Seattle failed? We can look to California with its big government and foundation approach in saving the schooner C A Thayer. It worked, saving a priceless artifact for future generations. This begs the question, why was Seattle’s congressional delegation lacking in bringing home funds? It is unfortunate Wawona’s last berth was not in Alaska where the historic cutter Storis will reside.
Another approach is Maine’s free-market way. Maine’s windjammer fleet not only provides jobs, and income from paying passengers, but the schooner fleet benefits all Maine ports, making Maine a desirable destination for East Coast residents. Venerable Maine schooners include the Lewis R French, Nathaniel Bowditch, and the Mercantile.
Imagine a renovated Wawona as a dude schooner, visiting the ports of Puget Sound; bringing home the tourist dollar from California cities. This would benefit Port Townsend, Gig Harbor and others, as well as Seattle. Imagination and courage is called for, dear reader, before they cut up Wawon’s stout keel.
Sincerely
Rep. Steven W. Lindsey
Ches-3
Keene, NH 03431
Note to editor: Steven W Lindsey is a former resident of Seattle as well as a former crewmember of the steamer Virginia V, and is a NH state representative. He has worked on historic vessels USCGC Westwind, USCGC Northwind, the M/S Mount Washington and Seattle icebreaker USCGC Polar Sea. He is an avid preservationist.
Fore verification, call me at 603-547-7375 or e-mail me at SteveLindsey60@hotmail.com Word count: 200
Posted Tue, Feb 24, 10:30 a.m. Inappropriate
Get Real, people. Restoring the Wawona would cost $20,000,000. Once restored, it would cost 5% a year - one million dollars - to keep her in good condition. Charging admission is NOT going to pay those costs. Several years ago, WOODENBOAT magazine did a two part story on successful - and unsuccessful - big ship restoration efforts. No effort in the US - or Europe - has been ultimately successful without large government subsides. So, you can spend money on the homeless - or on big ship restoration. You choose. Personally, I think it makes more sense to support the Center for Wooden Boats, the Arthur Foss, the Virginia V, and in Port Townsend, the Northwest Maritime Center and the Wooden Boat Foundation. These are efforts that are growing and prospering. The Wawona has been a too far gone for years.
Ross Kane Warm Beach
Posted Tue, Feb 24, 10:33 a.m. Inappropriate
One need not go to Oslo, or the east coast to see a nice land use of a historic vessel... On Tacoma's waterfront, they have set their historic fireboat, Fireboat No. 1, now an NPS National Historic Landmark
Designated June 30, 1989
The 1929 fireboat Fireboat No. 1 is displayed in a permanent dry- berth designed to resemble a graving dock off Ruston Way in Marine Park in Tacoma, Washington. Displayed on the shoreline of Puget Sound, Fireboat No. 1 is owned by the City of Tacoma and is currently awaiting final restoration prior to opening as a public museum and exhibit.
The small brass artifacts, including the fireboat's bell, nameplate, telegraphs, and other easily portable features have been removed for safe-keeping and are curated at Tacoma Fire Station #18. The fireboat's red hull, trim and ship-shape condition, and seemingly temporarily "dry-docked" appearance convey the high degree of integrity this historic vessel possesses.
But in Seattle we scrape em, sink em or loose em... MAYBE there is an eastside city with more understanding of their history who could do with the Wawona what Tacoma did. After all, Kirklands main industry for 20 some years was to be the winter fleet of the Whale ships, and the shipyards at Houghton... maybe she could be set up in a Kirkland waterfront site... We are too busy in Seattle building Streetcar Lines and filling potholes.
Posted Tue, Feb 24, 11:11 a.m. Inappropriate
As an employee of the Center for Wooden Boats I have a unique relationship with the Wawona. I work next to it every day, and I discovered the CWB because I saw the masts and followed them to Lake Union. For the past five years I have been right next to its potential and problems and my viewpoint has shifted from mocking, to understanding, to respect for both the vessel and the direction of the organization that owns it.
The issue here isn’t whether the Wawona should be saved- of course it should. It is a significant vessel that completely embodies the history of our region. Few are happy about the vessel going away, and by in large even visitors seeing it for the first time express sadness upon hearing of her fate. There will be a sense of loss when she's gone.
I think a more productive issue for us as a community to think about is how to best preserve both her story and her dignity given the finite resources available.
The vessel is deteriorating, and as rot tends to have an exponential growth rate, she's deteriorating fast. Doing nothing is not an option, nor is launching an impassioned last minute fundraising effort. The price tag for a restoration is high in any year, and these economic times would make it near impossible. Moreover, hope and ardent emotions without a feasible plan is not a strategy that yields success; it hasn’t worked until this point and it wouldn’t have any more success now.
In this vein, that rather than feeling rage like some of the other comments, I am impressed by NW Seaport's decision. It is easy to point fingers. What is harder is for an organization to look inward, accurately asses what is possible and make the responsible decision regardless of the investment of countless hours, substantial financial resources, and hearts and imagination of thousands of people. That is hard, but the work that needed to be done.
Despite what might be said about the cumulative effect of their involvement, over the past few years NW Seaport have taken a measured approach to Wawona. In the fall of 2006 they convened a panel of experts from across the country to come up with a set of recommendations for the Wawona, The options the panel came up with ranged from scuttling the ship in Lake Washington to a complete restoration ala San Francisco’s C A Thayer. While many of the panel disagreed on which option was the best, they all agreed that the $20 million restoration was beyond the capabilities of the organization, and not one that could be made more possible through volunteer work parties.
Over the past year NW Seaport and the City have worked to find the best course for the vessel. During all of the discussions NW Seaport worked to preserve as much as they could. They brought out a top team of maritime archaeologists from Eastern Carolina University who documented the vessel to excruciating standards. Over the past month NW Seaport has worked to preserve as many pieces of the vessel as possible and to work with MOHAI on how to interpret the vessel’s history in their new museum in Lake Union Park. While it’s a long shot, should a future effort be made to recreate the Wawona, this documentation would make it possible.
It’s easy to cast blame, it is appropriate to feel a sense of loss, and it is natural to feel disappointment while wondering how this could possibly happen. Emerging from all of that, I came to a realization that this course is the result of an organization taking responsible actions and focusing on the victories that are obtainable. NW Seaport owns the national landmark vessels Arthur Foss (1889 Tugboat), and the Lightship #83. These vessels are in better shape, have resources secured for their restoration, and have programs to engage the public. What we can do for the Wawona is to celebrate her life, and work diligently towards the preservation and success of other projects.
Posted Tue, Feb 24, 1:47 p.m. Inappropriate
One must wonder, though, how much this scuttling is costing us. In June of '08, Knute wrote: "The estimated cost of that [salvaging some portions] was less than $1 million." City Council has been pretty strict with the Park's budget, and the line item for documenting and dismantling the Wawona was only $400,000. Hard to believe all the work mentioned above AND readying it for removal to Lake Union Dry Dock, dismantling and hauling & dumping the remains can be done for that. Perhaps there are some kind-hearted donors out there helping us preserve this heritage?
Posted Tue, Feb 24, 2:21 p.m. Inappropriate
Like jbeattie, I spent some time at the CFB and watched the years take its toll on the Wawona's wood walls. I remember when the bandsaw was brought in. When a few knees were symbolically cut for placement in the Wawona. The promise of renovation never came through. As far as I am concerned, the Northwest Seaport sat on their hands. Other maritime projects that succeeded---Virginia V and Duwamish fireboat, succeeded without the NW Seaport. They wisely steered clear.
Considering the Seaport's track record--the ferry San Mateo and now Wawona, I predict the Wawona's fate will be that of the Arthur Foss in twenty years, and the lightship in forty.
Northwest Seaport, in my opinion, is a death sentence for our maritime history.
Rep. Steven W Lindsey
Ches-3
Keene, NH 03431
SteveLindsey60@hotmail.com
Posted Tue, Feb 24, 10:10 p.m. Inappropriate
I'm with you Steve, but with the caveat that I feel that NW Seaport is a different organization today than it was during the San Mateo years.
Not sure what axe you have to grind, but to the extent you'd like to have a dialogue with the folks that are currently involeved over there I'd be happy to help make that happen. I have worked with them throughout my tneure here at CWB and have experienced them to be well-intentioned, rational people who are looking for solutions for incredibly complex problems.
It sounds like you have a passionate perspective to add, and it might be a piece of one of those solutions. I cant speak for them, but let me know it you are interested and I'll see what I can do. (jbeattie@cwb.org)
I applaud for your passion on the subject, the key is figuring out what we can do.
Posted Wed, Feb 25, 9:44 a.m. Inappropriate
jbeattie,
Thank you for your generous offer. I was a volunteer and crewmember aboard the Virginia V back in my Seattle days. Maybe my views of NW Seaport were formed back then among the deckhands and Capt Don Moss was in her pilot house.
I guess I have harsh feelings after the loss of the San Mateo (As far as I know, laid up on a Fraser River bank...fairly recent photo I found on Google.) The loss of Wawona brings this all back.
Another "lost" ship to Seattle was the old USCG Fir (212) now apparantly a museum in Richmond, Cal.
Posted Thu, Feb 26, 1:24 p.m. Inappropriate
PUT IT IN THE TRASH
Despite WAWONA's eminent dismantling, Seattle's maritime heritage is no loser. Seattle still has a lot of maritime history that is very much alive; the evidence of it everywhere. In fact, there are more neat old boats in the Pacific Northwest than anywhere in the world, despite claims that San Francisco holds the title. Sadly, some of our armchair sailors won't take the time to walk to their condo window to view these boats, let alone get involved, so the historical maritime collections are downsized.
Sentimentality aside, the decision to demolish the WAWONA is ultimately a business decision made by the owners after much deliberation. That's right – it's not publicly owned. The WAWONA is privately owned and managed with some additional public project funding, yet the project has ultimately failed for many reasons. The real outrage is that Seattle citizens are paying for the WAWONA's disposal, but this is just one of the incidental costs in being a city.
The importance of having neat old boats preserved is great enough that the risk is justified. Rather than the public owning a big old boat like the C A THAYER, our city sprinkles little bits of money around like watering a garden. This is an efficient way to see which projects are viable and supported by the public, and which are a boondoggle in the making. The city's seed money sprouts some VIRGINIA Vs and some WAWONAs, and once in a while, the weeds get pulled.
While this seed money is a great way try out city projects, our leaders may want to add a few strings and be a little more selective in handing out the money to prevent such huge loses, and better yet have bigger successes. This sounds scary, but I am sure that there are good ways to rate projects for the city to invest in. Really good projects should then be funded well and earlier, and poor investments identified and culled earlier.
That's right – culled! Oh, the tears!
The only tears from this decision are being shed by a peripheral crowd. The masses don't even know what a WAWONA is, and those closely involved have been continually briefed for the last ten years and have prepared for this decision. The only ones commenting on these articles crying out to "Save the WAWONA!" are those who clearly haven't been involved with the ship for many years and are just trying to cast blame on others.
Speaking of those closely involved, I am very excited about the future of preserving and interpreting Puget Sound's maritime history. Leaders from all the maritime heritage organizations are pulling together more than ever before, as it's needed more than ever before. The teamwork demonstrated recently is amazing. All decisions are thoroughly discussed, more people are getting involved, and the former waterfront clique is now an inviting waterfront garden, open to the public and increasingly supported by a real community.
Adrian Lipp
Old Tacoma Marine Inc
www.oldtacomamarine.com