It's hard to avoid the obvious: the real target of the Washington Legislature's cut in Auditor Brian Sonntag's budget was not Sonntag himself. It was Tim Eyman, whose Initiative 900 boosted Sonntag's power and budget.
Eyman drives legislative Democrats crazy, but has forged a marriage of convenience with Democrat Sonntag, who coyly plays the initiative guru at arm's length. Now he likes Eyman and his initiatives, now he doesn't — a slippery relationship, but it works.
Cutting the popular state auditor's budget was politics of over-reach. Democrats have a large-enough majority to have their way on nearly any issue, and the Sonntag budget was an excuse to stick their thumbs in Eyman's eye. They indulged themselves and managed to bring down the wrath of Washington editors, who like to throw Eyman a bone whenever possible, to offset their frequent opposition to his ballot measures.
Not smart, as Gov. Chris Gregoire realized and cut a deal with Sonntag. Eyman, meanwhile, gets more talking points in his daily screeds to the media and to the folks who pony up funds to keep him employed. The budget issue is complicated, as Andrew Garber pointed out in the Seattle Times, but the politics is pretty basic. Populist outrage is good politics right now, and Eyman is its master.
As long as he can convincingly play the role of underdog and as long as the state's media accord him celebrity status, Eyman will trump an unpopular Legislature every time. You have to admire his skills, if not his proposals, and the Legislature has now given him publicity and credibility that he will use to take another whack at whatever issue seems likely to rouse the public indignation and fuel his money machine.
The only thing that will ultimately bring Eyman down is the same thing that brought the Legislature down in this little skirmish: over-reach. Just as the Legislature over-reached in its attempt to punish Eyman through Sonntag, temptations to over-reach will face Eyman.
Another really poor initiative like last year's I-985, which was falsely labeled as aligned with Sonntag's audits of the State Department of Transportation, would be an over-reach. Of more significance would be running for statewide office as a Republican; he's already closely aligned with the party, but a partisan race would cause him to lose many Democrats who now support him at least part of the time. That might include Brian Sonntag.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email





Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Wed, May 20, 1:10 p.m. Inappropriate
From: Tim Eyman
RE: I gave Gregoire my I-900 t-shirt after her veto -- but it's not all good news
I arrived in the Governor's reception area yesterday afternoon wearing a black, long-sleeve, Initiative 900 t-shirt with a menacing 900 pound gorilla on the front and back. Legislators and staffers milled around, doing everything possible not to acknowledge me -- I was, as usual, the skunk at the party. Going in, I didn't know what Gregoire was going to do.
I was nervous: was the Governor going to veto the Democrat Legislature's gutting of performance audits or would she let it stand?
Speaker Frank Chopp walked in, shook hands with several folks, we made eye contact, he came over and said "Hi Tim", I replied "Hello Frank", and after a little small talk, he said "I think we've got you covered" and then walked away. I was encouraged.
All of us were then invited into the main room for the bill signing. Lots of people, lots of media, lots of pomp and circumstance. Gregoire was surrounded by legislators and gave a short speech about the tough budgeting decisions they had made, then said there were several bills she was going to veto. First up was the issue of performance audits. She said straight-out that she was going to veto the $29 million transfer and also was going to veto a totally whacko provision giving the Auditor a 'bounty' payment for savings realized from his audit recommendations (Sonntag said such a requirement would completely interfere with auditing standards and objectivity and was horrible public policy).
At this point, I was very, very pleased.
Then Gregoire said something very disturbing, explaining that she had reached an agreement with Auditor Sonntag for him to transfer a smaller amount -- $15 million -- from I-900's dedicated account for performance audits toward other government spending during the next legislative session. That's very bad news and I address that more fully below. But back to the bill signing:
After the Governor and Democrat legislators gave their speeches and after their Q&A; session with the media was completed, I went up to the Governor and said "Well, here you go Governor" and I took off my I-900 t-shirt (I had another t-shirt underneath) and said "I'm giving you the shirt off my back for doing the right thing. Well done, Governor." I then made a joke, telling her that wearing the shirt in 2012 would likely be a vote-getter for her reelection campaign. I then received an official pen from the Governor from the bill signing.
All of you should be very proud of yourselves. The past two weeks produced hundreds of emails, phone calls, and letters to the Governor from all of you. Your messages to her were passionate, persuasive, and pointed. You were all incredibly respectful and polite. I firmly believe she would not have vetoed if not for your activism and your persistence. Again, you should be very pleased with what we all accomplished together.
But as Amber Gunn of the Evergreen Freedom Foundation accurately points out, the proposed $15 million transfer from I-900's dedicated account is totally illegal. Here's what she wrote about that:
The hitch in this story, however, is found in the governor’s veto message, which states in part: “The Auditor has committed to a $15 million transfer that can be accomplished in the next legislative session.” Auditor Brian Sonntag may have agreed to such a transfer, but the citizens haven’t. Initiative 900 (the performance audit law) was strictly crafted to protect performance audit funding. The law established a dedicated performance audit account that can be tapped only by the State Auditor and only for the purpose of funding performance audits. Note the excerpts from sections 3 and 5 below.
Beginning on December 8, 2005, 0.16 percent of the taxes collected under subsection (1) of this section shall be dedicated to funding comprehensive performance audits required under section 2 of this act. The revenue identified in this subsection shall be deposited in the Performance Audits of Government Account created in section 5 of this act.
Money in the account shall be used to fund the performance audits and follow-up performance audits under section 2 of this act and shall be expended by the state auditor in accordance with this act.
Verbal agreements between the governor and auditor notwithstanding, the State Auditor does not have the unilateral authority to authorize a legislative transfer from the dedicated performance audit account. The account is held in trust by Auditor Sonntag on behalf of citizens to conduct performance audits as directed in the law. Even if he has agreed to give the money away, he does not have the authority to do so.
Here's Amber's complete analysis: http://www.libertylive.org/blog_main/post.php?post_id=1416
Sonntag was given a choice - agree to a $15 million transfer later or allow the entire $29 million transfer to go forward now. In Olympia, that's business-as-usual and it's called a 'deal' -- out here in the real world, it's called blackmail. In the movie the Godfather, Don Vito Corleone, played by Marlon Brando, famously said: "I'll make him an offer he can't refuse." That's what happened here. But because of the Governor's veto, we live to fight another day. Next session, there will be a bill introduced that takes away $15 million from I-900's dedicated performance audit account. During the hearing on that bill next year, all of us will work together to push against their proposed illegal transfer.
The fight continues. But with the Governor's veto, we've achieved an important victory that would not have happened if not for your hard work. Congratulations, everyone!!
At this point, we must postpone our efforts on behalf of I-900 (we've accomplished all we can on that for now) and WE MUST ALL REFOCUS OUR ENERGIES AND ATTENTION TOWARD I-1033'S SIGNATURE DRIVE. The July 3rd deadline ...
Posted Thu, May 21, 5:21 a.m. Inappropriate
Floyd: Tim thanks you for giving him yet another forum; heh..heh..heh..
Posted Thu, May 21, 6:37 a.m. Inappropriate
Hey! There's no ink left!
Posted Thu, May 21, 8:05 a.m. Inappropriate
Tim Eyman? Overeach? Surely he won't. He took a mere 1004 words to comment on Floyd's 436-word story.
Posted Fri, May 22, 2:05 p.m. Inappropriate
Rad!
I would leave it at that, but the thing seems to be to count each others' words. Everyone note: though this comment is like 36 words long, the substantive part is only one word long!
Posted Fri, May 22, 2:50 p.m. Inappropriate
TE's response was longer than it should have been but some of the information in it was new to me and probably should have been in McKay's article.