KING-FM lays off three classical-music hosts
In another sign of the tepid economy and of large-scale changes in the radio industry, Seattle’s classical music station KING FM laid off three staff members this week. Gone are three very familiar presences: midday host Steve Reeder, overnight and fill-in host (and former longtime KING program director) Peter Newman, and evening host Gigi Yellen. Reeder and Newman have been associated with KING for decades, while Yellen was with the station for about six years.
Station manager Jennifer Ridewood said in a phone interview Friday that the three were let go in a cost-cutting move. While not quoting specific KING revenue declines, Ridewood said that radio revenues in the Seattle market in general are down 20 percent. Commercial time on KING-FM is sold by Fisher (owners of KOMO stations), as part of an advertising-network agreement that runs through June 2011. Ridewood said no pressure came from Fisher to make changes to programming, but she said that the two boards (“Beethoven” and “Classic Radio, Inc.”) that govern KING FM directed her to reduce expenses.
KING FM was founded 61 years ago by the legendary broadcasting pioneer, Dorothy Bullitt. The station is owned by a not-for-profit partnership comprised of the Seattle Symphony, Seattle Opera, and arts granting organization ArtsFund. Proceeds benefit all three groups (in the case of ArtsFund, money flows to a variety of smaller musical organizations). This unique partnership largely responsible for KING FM’s survival in an age when many big cities have lost classical music stations. Besides the traditional FM signal at 98.1, KING also broadcasts multiple specialized channels on the Internet and via HD. As a nonprofit station, it also conducts membership drives, seeking individual donations.
Many local radio stations are also reeling from the introduction earlier this year by Arbitron of PPM or “PeopleMeter” technology to measure the listening audience. PeopleMeters are beeper-sized devices carried by a statistical sampling of people in a given market, such as the Seattle area. The devices register actual exposure to particular radio signals (via an inaudible tone), rather than relying on individuals to remember what they listened to and for how long (and then later record this information in a diary, as in the old ratings system).
Ridewood says KING wasn’t a ratings powerhouse in the diary system (which mainly tracked an audience typically younger that the average KING listener), and that while the PeopleMeters registered a larger audience for KING, the amount of time spent listening dropped. Advertising rates for an individual station are mostly based on the number of listeners and time spent listening that the station can deliver.
So, apart from the loss of some familiar voices on-air, what does all this mean for KING FM? Ridewood says KING is all about great music and that listeners won’t hear a difference beyond the absence of those let go this week. However, the station has been using a technology called “voicetracking” to cover overnight and some weekend periods and will begin using it even more. Voicetracking allows a host (as KING’s on-air people are called — these Mozart-spinners are NOT called DJs) to pre-record all the announcements for a four-hour show in a fraction of the time. It is likely that the layoffs this week mean that more and more of KING’s broadcast day will be programmed this way. Ridewood says the drivetime shifts (with Brad Eaton in the morning and Sean MacLean in the afternoon) will remain live; the rest of the schedule apparently is fair game for voicetracking.
Critics of voicetracking say that, at the very least, the technology takes away the spontaneity of traditional live-hosted radio, and inhibits a station from responding to changes in news and weather, for example, that their listeners may be simultaneously experiencing.
When Michael Jackson passed away in June, pop stations using voicetracking technology weren’t able to shift as quickly to Jackson tribute mode as their live-hosted counterparts. Voicetracking critics seized on this as a benign example of something much worse that could happen during a natural disaster or terror attack — when voicetracked radio stations would fiddle while Rome burned (or at least until a live host could be hustled into the studio).









Comments:
Posted Thu, Oct 1, 5:45 a.m. inappropriate
I didn't know about the axings at KING-FM -- Who will rid me of this turbulent KING ? It must have just happened. I just heard Gigi Yellen's show last week. What a loss ! Gigi was amazingly gifted, beautifully voiced, mature and irreproachable on the air. Steve Reeder came to KING from WFMT in Chicago many years ago, and he was both pleasantly genial and well informed without being overbearing about it. Peter Newman was part-time on the air, but I must say, as part of its management in the Nineties he shares some of the blame for the monster KING has become : He banned vocal music and a lot of solo instrumentals (the Bach violin partitas and cello suites, for example). So Newman deserved to go to the block.
With the excellent Yellen and Reeder gone, what we are left with is the two daytime chatterboxes Brad Eaton and Sean MacLean ; the latter being a knowledgeable musician, but his speaking style is somewhat grating in the sense that it comes across as ingratiating to old ladies in a calculated way. Eaton, the veteran morning guy, just sounds like an old lady -- on uppers.
Then there is Maxine Frost, who is young and new -- and sounds it. Though her voice quality is nice enough in itself, she mumbles and trails at the end of each phrase. A recently introduced announcer on the air, she was brought over from KING's Web-only Evergreen Channel, which plays Top of the Pops classical "product". Miss Frost often seems uncomfortable facing the music, so to speak. I heard her in an overnight slot (just a digital recording of her announcing, probably) in which she back-announced a lute piece as, "That was called Chaconne or 'Song'". She was thinking of chanson, which is bad enough for mistranslation, but also it's like saying, "That was a piece called Symphony in C minor by Brahms". It ain't called that, it simply is that ! Good Lord, just when I had been hoping to hear any bit of spontaneity on the station, she provided it with a cringeworthy bungle that wouldn't be countenanced in a freshman's college radio show.
That's another thing, they are now programming a ridiculously large proportion of lute and guitar pieces -- doubtless as a result of some focus group or industry poll. Then the rest of the air time is filled in --and it really does feel like filler-- with excerpts, an inoffensive Andante plucked from a symphony here, a short single movement from a sonata or concerto there. Repetition and rotation are frequent for the pop classical pieces. I swear, they went three weeks straight playing the Albinoni Adagio every night -- often in the same saxophone arrangement ! Sometimes I think the engineer mismatches the pre-recorded announcements with the music, as I heard Maxine Frost's faint and earnest voice say "Moonlight Sonata" -- but some Baroque piece came on. (Or maybe it was her screw-up, just as likely.)
I have a few more comments about your piece, annotated interstitially below :
>. . . PeopleMeters registered a larger audience for KING, the amount of time spent listening >dropped. Advertising rates for an individual station are mostly based on the number of listeners >and time spent listening that the station can deliver.
>So, apart from the loss of some familiar voices on-air, what does all this mean for KING >FM? Ridewood says KING is all about great music and that listeners won’t hear a difference >beyond the absence of those let go this week.
[My note :] They fired the wrong people. They need to restructure and get rid of the high-dollar top-heavy management, the overthinkers, the radio industry research consultants, and the bloated advertising and promotions staff. What a lie this Ridewood person is promulgating ! : KING-FM is not "all about great music" -- they spend their entire time promoting the station and playing horrid mattress commercials around the clock, to such an extent that great music --Hell, small music !-- is pushed aside in favour of jingles. Yes indeed, "listeners won't hear a difference" -- and that's the bad news. What KING needs to do is trash all the commercials and the promos, eliminate the extramural funding of live arts, and sell off their live-remote gear and flashy vans ; then play more music per minute, and go to low-key sponsorships and more silent investments, which I believe was the original intention of the Dorothy Bullitt bequest which created the station. KING has the extensive discotheca of great musical heritage, they just aren't using it.
>However, the station has been using a technology called “voicetracking” to cover overnight and >some weekend periods and will begin using it even more. Voicetracking allows a host (as >KING’s on-air people are called — these Mozart-spinners are NOT called DJs) to pre-record all >the announcements for a four-hour show in a fraction of the time. It is likely that the layoffs this >week mean that more and more of KING’s broadcast day will be programmed this way. >Ridewood says the drivetime shifts (with Brad Eaton in the morning and Sean MacLean in the >afternoon) will remain live; the rest of the schedule apparently is fair game for voicetracking.
[My note :] These pre-recorded segments are already impacting the quality on the air, as I noted above.
>Critics of voicetracking say that, at the very least, the technology takes away the spontaneity of >traditional live-hosted radio, and inhibits a station from responding to changes in news and >weather, for example, that their listeners may be simultaneously experiencing.
[My note :] Actually, this last point about "responding" is kind of a weak argument as to critique. If there were, on the odd occasion, a weather crisis or some disaster in the news which couldn't be ignored (terrorist attack, president or conductor dies), conceivably the engineer or manager could come on the air and deal with it. It's not like the station ...
Posted Thu, Oct 1, 6:43 a.m. inappropriate
[CONTINUED & CONCLUDED FROM THE ABOVE] . . .It's not like the station is totally automated and deserted. By FCC rules someone has to be there.
But my criticism of KING-FM, first and last, is that the music has suffered terribly, the spoken context has been restricted, dumbed down or trivialised, and the musical stewardship has been abjured utterly. For those reasons KING-FM must be changed radically -- at the top.
~Quinn~
The U-District, Seattle.
Posted Mon, Oct 12, 10:52 a.m. inappropriate
THANK YOU for reporting this!! When it initially happened, I couldn't find a single news article to tell me what the heck was happening with my favorite station. I think king.org did their listeners a disservice by not posting even a brief note.
I agree with Quinn about the voicetracking; it's sloppy, drives me nuts, and is only going to get worse. I respectfully disagree, however, about Brad & Sean -- they have always been two of my favorites. I understand about layoffs in this economy, and since Gigi was new(er) & Peter was part-time, that makes sense. But Steve?!? Geeze let's throw the opera workhorse under the bus! (Mangled metaphor, I know. Sorry.)
I hope our departed hosts (like so many other workers today) land on their feet. If anyone has an update as to where they end up, please post.
Posted Tue, Oct 13, 4:12 a.m. inappropriate
Dear "dinodoc" ~ I may not have shown it in my copious notes of October 1 --a litany of woes which reflected my cumulative frustrations of fourteen years as a KING-FM listener-- but I actually have great respect for the services performed by Brad Eaton, Sean MacLean and Maxine Frost. These three remaining announcers most often sound very fine (truly, Mr Eaton did not deserve my slight). Besides, I am quite sure they have enough to cope with --not least, survivors' guilt after the axings of Gigi and Steve-- without reading my severe judgements of their work. However, I still must iterate --albeit in what will seem milder accents, I trust-- my chief objections, which are to their excessively chatty tone in announcing serious pieces of music (the rare ones that get air time), to their commercial voiceovers which cheapen the milieu for classical music lovers, and again, to the bumbling and the mumbling in the night. More generally, as I indicated in my earlier response, the graver problems remain with the state of KING-FM management. For some years now, it has been in dire need of personnel changes and restructuring, given their policy of near-incessant commercials, their uninspired routine of mandating itty-bitty musical excerpts in which one innocuous movement is played out of a larger work, and their continuing ban on most vocal music : Whither fled those vespers, cantatas, oratorios, art songs and arias (as if instrumental arrangements of "Casta diva" were some sort of acceptable substitute for an actual diva's interpretation)? Further indication that current KING-FM management doesn't "get it" is heard in the surfeit of programmed lute and guitar pieces which, for all their exquisite beauty in themselves, are now frittering away the KING-FM "clock" day and night and crowding out substantive concert repertoire. Where are the Mozart Masses, the Bruckner symphonies, the Medtner concertos? The icing on this adulterated cake is the soulless repetition heard in the increasingly applied mechanical voicetracking. Might these concerns for a radio station so dysfunctional actually justify a regular weekly KINGWATCH column from the pen of Feliks Banel? For such yeomanry, he and his editor would find in me a constant reader, Quinn, Seattle. ~ P. S. Your metaphor is by no means mangled, "dinodoc" ~ only the drayhorse is, and I place his unfortunate encounter with that omnibus circa 1895.
Posted Sat, Nov 14, 10:29 a.m. inappropriate
KINGWATCH - count me in.
The current air staff - I miss Tom Dahlstrom.
Posted Sat, Nov 14, 10:32 a.m. inappropriate
The playlist - focus groups have given us music to mince by.
Posted Fri, Jan 8, 6:22 a.m. inappropriate
I see I'm a bit late to the party here, but I felt compelled to respond to Quinn's comments. I appreciate his point of view, and he certainly has a right to express them -- though I do think the tone is surprisingly unpleasant for this kind of forum. Some of Quinn's points are valid. He's right that a chaconne isn't necessarily a song. I do occasionally make mistakes, and I'm happy to admit it. Sorry about that!
Radio is unique, and its intimacy is unmatched. Our voices go deep into the ear and also into the hearts and minds of our listeners -- if it's working. Fundamentally, you can't please everyone. It's always been true that some of us announcers will be beloved and embraced by many, and disliked and and even vilified (on a public forum, yet) by others. I can't change how the world works, but the cruelty of some of these comments has confused me. I think there's a way to experess how you feel without gratuitous jabs. Quinn's comments about my co-workers, also, were just tasteless and unnecessary.
For my own part, I'm flattered to be considered young (I'm in my forties, actually)! I don't have the level of knowledge of Steve Reeder or Gigi Yellen or Peter Newman, but I'm getting there. My strengths are that I really love the music -- I was a piano performance major in college. I love people, and I love radio. Many of our KING FM audience members have been kind and appreciative, and their support gives me strength every day.
Posted Fri, Jan 8, 4:54 p.m. inappropriate
Regarding comments previously published here by one "Quinn": Your contrived, "I'm so full of myself I need to take a good dump" diatribe aimed at present conditions at 60+ year old Seattle icon, KING-FM, was the stuff of an arrested development mindset which should have been on a much shorter leash! Listener for 14 years? Indeed, the necessary qualifications to give expert opinions! Brash upstart at best. KING-FM has been an integral part of my listening base for well over 33 years now and unlike you and your derision of the station, I prefer to continue to support efforts by the station to remain viable in our current economic situation, and think positively for the future of the Old Lady of Classical Music in Seattle. If you find you cannot support change and, hopefully , continuing improvement to KING-FM then you are welcome to take your attitude and tune in to the OTHER classical music stations that are popping up all over the landscape. Happy hunting!
Posted Mon, Jan 11, 1:45 p.m. inappropriate
Oharne's vulgar comments miss the point. I support for change at KING-FM under new leadership, and that is how I expressed it in a public forum, not with "radio means intimacy" bromides. Positive change, obviously, is not happening on the KING-FM airwaves, and no amount of misconceived provincial loyalty, empty boosterism or scoldings that we should "think positively" will bring it about ; nor will huffing and puffing at the station's critics. Oharne knows that KING-FM's nasty habits didn't start with the current recession. As for "hopefully, continuing improvement" as he puts it ?- For anyone with ears to hear, the results just aren't there.