Another try for charter schools
The federal stimulus bill has had one notable effect in Washington. It’s revived the hopes of charter school advocates. In an email that went out September 28, long-time charter advocate Jim Spady has called for help in setting up a new organization, Kids First Washington, to lobby the legislature for charter legislation in 2010. Spady’s wife, Fawn, will head the new group and lobbying effort, according to the email.
What’s breathed life into charter school advocates is the $4.3 billion for education grants in the stimulus bill. Education Secretary Arne Duncan says the “Race for the Top” grants will favor states making what he calls common sense reforms, including laws permitting charter schools. Forty states allow them. Washington doesn’t.
Spady’s email says a new charter law would unlock $200 million to $400 million in “Race for the Top” funds that the state won’t otherwise get. Gov. Chris Gregoire admits the state won’t get top dollar from the feds without a charter law, according to an editorial in The Olympian, a couple weeks ago.
The Spadys were leaders in the 1990s and first half of this decade trying to get a charter law passed here. They were successful with the 2004 legislature but the law was turned back by voters who rejected Referendum 55. That was the third defeat at the polls in Washington for proposed charter school laws. Charter initiatives were beaten back in 1996 and 2000.
The Referendum 55 campaign was a mighty clash. Charter advocates spent nearly $4 million, including about $3 million from Bill Gates; Don Fisher, a co-founder of the Gap, Inc.; and John Walton, of the family that started Wal-Mart, according to a Seattle Times report by Linda Shaw. The victorious opponents, led by the Washington Education Association (WEA), the state teachers union, and backed by the National Education Association (NEA), the union’s parent, spent about $1.3 million.
It seems the Spadys have set out to see if times have changed, thanks to that big carrot from the Obama administration.









Comments:
Posted Fri, Oct 2, 12:58 p.m. inappropriate
"Spady’s wife, Fawn, will head the new group and lobbying effort, according to the email." Sigh. I think it's time for some new blood in this effort, a lot of it. Better to bring some of that in first, before self-appointing the same old failed leadership again.
Personally, I've voted against charter schools in the past, but my "ahah" moment came when I contemplated -- if we didn't have public schools and were going to invent them today, would we carve up the state into mostly-arbitrary districts and elect local residents to boards to run the schools in each district? I think No, we'd find a better way to set up and run public schools.
Maybe charter schools can be that better way, but we're not going to find out by repeating the same old failed charter campaigns of the past.
Posted Fri, Oct 2, 4:39 p.m. inappropriate
Two points:
1) Pro-charter forces have already infiltrated the Seattle Public School district. http://seattle-ed.blogspot.com/
2) Charters are not all they are cracked up to be. "A report issued by the Center for Research on Education Outcomes(CREDO) at Stanford University found that there is a wide variance in the quality of the nation’s several thousand charter schools with, in the aggregate, students in charter schools not faring as well as students in traditional public schools. "
http://credo.stanford.edu/
Posted Fri, Oct 2, 9:48 p.m. inappropriate
Seattle has a rich and varied history of alternative school programs starting with Alternative School #1 (AS1) which was established in Seattle about forty years ago. When my daughter and I moved to Seattle, I discovered the alternative school program and was greatly impressed by what the school district had to offer. There are programs for students K-12 at various locations throughout Seattle. High schools such as Nova, have a track record of high test scores and placement in some of our best colleges in the country. There are waiting lists into each of these programs and the level of quality of the staff is outstanding.
These well established programs need to be maintained and supported. These schools provide an opportunity for all students to succeed, not just a select few. That is what Seattle has and other schools can be developed based on the proven track record of the original alternative school program structure. Governor Gregoire has stated this to Arne Duncan when pressed about charter schools. The state of Washington should receive the additional funding that Mr. Duncan is providing under the Race to the Top program because we have those programs in place. AS#1 established a charter with the public school system in the 1960's.
The answer can really be in your own back yard. What we already have is tried and true. The basic tenets of these programs can be used in developing new schools that can provide an even greater diversity for our students.
For additional information see:
http://ed.stanford.edu/suse/news-bureau/displayRecord.php?tablename=press&id;=15
http://learningmatters.tv/blog/op-ed/privatization-will-not-help-us-achieve-our-goals-an-interview-with-diane-ravitch/2413/#
http://schoolsmatter.blogspot.com/2009/06/open-letter-to-arne-duncan-from-herb.html