The pro-gay, anti-Eyman vote
Is is something in the water?
R-71, the gay partner benefits referendum, looks to be passing statewide (51 percent yes, 49 percent no), driven by the "yes" vote in 10 of Washington's 39 counties, all of them bordering the Salish Sea. In fact, only two counties on Puget Sound did not approve it: Pierce and Mason.
Compare that with the state spending and anti-tax initiative, I-1033. The Tim Eyman measure was defeated all around Puget Sound, again with the exception of Pierce and Mason counties. Yet, as of now, it's also going down to defeat (55 percent no to 45 percent yes) in more than half of the state's counties, including some in central Washington (Kittitas and Yakima), and nearly all of southeastern Washington, a generally Republican enclave (outside Spokane), including strongholds like Lincoln and Adams counties.
Support for gay rights is strong in Puget Sound country, and that has made the difference. But much of normally fiscally conservative Eastern Washington joined the Wetside in opposing Eyman's restraints on government spending and decision-making. The Dryside has benefited from huge state and federal projects (irrigation, dams, farm subsidies). In fact, in some counties, like Garfield, public-sector jobs are the biggest employer (Garfield rejected Eyman with a 60 percent "no" vote).
While there's a sense that red states and counties often don't vote their self-interest, maybe the Great Recession has brought a dose of realism. In Republican Adams county, R-71 was going down 73 percent to 27 percent, but so was the anti-tax measure 58 to 41. They may not be ready for almost-gay marriage, but they're also not ready to kill off government.








Comments:
Posted Thu, Nov 5, 8:48 a.m. inappropriate
First, the 10 counties in Western Washington that believe progress means destruction should be annexed to San Francisco. Then both annexed to Cuba. I believe the people living in these counties would be much happier living there so they don't have to put up with common sense, which they fight tooth and nail.
Secondly, isn't it easy to manipulate and deceive? When money is involved, principle flies out the window, especially if it's someone elses money.
Posted Thu, Nov 5, 9:06 a.m. inappropriate
R-71 is a basic issue of fairness, nothing more, nothing less. Opponents have about as much standing as the hardcore complicit Republicans that should be forced into involuntary bankruptcy.
That said, the State of Washington should get out of the business of Heterosexual marriage as well. Leave the entire subject to the couple and whomever they choose to associate with, perhaps even a church!
1033 is not so clear - awareness of the Keynesian role of government in the Puget Sound is a sign of smart voters - the problem is that we abused this role in the past, plus extended the same philosophies into housing monetary policies that are the source of the bubble. We are currently in recovery, but I highly doubt that we've made investments that have positive returns, most likely the opposite. It may well be possible that the net effect of the Obama stimulus is to simply protect the corrupt status quo for one more election cycle - and the further worsening of the underlying problems.
Of most concern on 1033 is the demonization of Tim Eyman. This has gotten out of hand and may itself be actionable - if not against him the repetition of the same behavior against other white males of roughly the same edge.
Consider also suburban races, such as Kemper Freeman's sweep in Bellevue and the resounding, unfortunate, defeat of the poorly planned Transportation Benefit District.
Posted Thu, Nov 5, 1:56 p.m. inappropriate
I don't think you can demonize Tim Eyman too much. He needs to get an honest job. His initiatives do harm to the poor and those who cannot defend themselves. If he wants to be involved in politics he should run for office, but of course he knows that he would be soundly defeated.
Posted Thu, Nov 12, 5:54 p.m. inappropriate
Eyman initiatives aren't always bad. Such as not having to pay ridiculous fees to get your vehicle licensed based on questionable valuations. And why would the dude run for office? He has had more impact on Washington tax laws over the past 15 years than any legislator in our state's history. And if you want to donate more money to the state government I seriously doubt they would turn it down.