If Mossback were dictator, no government office could be more than six stories off the ground. That would check public officials from getting too grand in their visions, and it would ensure that public employees were always within shouting range of the people. That scale is one of the things I like about Seattle's City Hall (which is actually a little bigger, at seven stories), though there are also things about it I don't like: the fake stream, for one.
One thing is certain: buildings make a statement. Churches used to be grand with spires; now the old ones are being demolished or recycled (Town Hall, for example) or vacated for ones that seem like suburban entertainment centers. Banks used to have tall columns and were built as temples to power, enterprise and authority; now they have counters and tellers in your local QFC. The ubiquity of banking is convenient, although the recent mortgage crisis is enough to make one yearn for the days when loans were harder to come by.
Libraries also used to be temples of a kind that suggest grandeur and permanence; now they're being replaced by a new generation of structures, architecturally fascinating, like Seattle's Koolhaas cubes, but also signifying a distinct lack of permanence. Instead of buttresses you have exposed bolts. They have the ephemeral feel of dot-com start-up spaces. Many of the old Carnegie structures seem to endure, even if not as libraries; yet many of the modern libraries that replaced them, like the 1960 modern central downtown branch, are already dust. We get new libraries that reflect our own transitional concept of what libraries should be, our doubts about whether or not they have anything to do with housing actual books.
City Halls were often once grand structures. I love the great gilded dome of San Francisco's, which seemed to perfectly capture the Golden Gate city's aspirations. Also, I've been reading about the restoration of Philadelphia's massive Second Empire pile which has been described as a civic white elephant, an expensive edifice that took so long to build that it outlived its architectural style. It looks, to some, like a Monte Carlo casino. Yet it has been expensively restored and is a tourist attraction, mainly for European visitors. It is a high-culture relic in a city that has become known for its blue-collar ethic. It would never be built today, especially in this era of Tea Party politics. No one thinks that highly of government anymore, or of bureaucrats.
Back to Seattle: We seem to have a mayor now who fits his City Hall. The grassy roof matches his beard (there is a mini beard trend down there: even Mayor Mike McGinn's spokesman has sprouted whiskers). The greenish building expresses the kind of ambivalence about power reflected in the politics of our eco-activist mayor. Our City Hall, unlike Philadelphia's, mirrors the concept, at least, of sustainability. It's a comparatively modest structure that stands ready to be recycled and composted. A wise choice for our political times.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email





Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Tue, May 25, 12:07 p.m. Inappropriate
Don't forget about our schools! Queen Anne's high school was a beautiful temple of learning. Then we sold it for pocket change. Now the local high school is in the Seattle Center over the food court.
Here's a write up about Queen Anne's schools I wrote last year:
http://www.orphanroad.com/blog/2009/05/beautiful-schools-my-son-could-have-attended
Posted Tue, May 25, 2:05 p.m. Inappropriate
I wonder if there's any truth to the rumor that that fake stream was originally supposed to be a real one. There used to be springs all over the city, of course, though most of them have been paved over. Supposedly one was located somewhere in the vicinity of today's Civic Center complex, and they were thinking of daylighting it.
Returning flowing water to urban areas (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheonggyecheon) is a great idea, if you can pull it off. If you can't, it becomes just another water feature.
Posted Tue, May 25, 6:47 p.m. Inappropriate
Spring Stteet, Ben
Posted Wed, May 26, 12:11 p.m. Inappropriate
The biggeat problem with our City Hall is it's location. Who can easily get to it? Certainly not a handicapped citizen. And the wind tunnel that it created (juxtaposed other bland public buildings) sets you back one step for every two one takes.
It should have been built on the block where the Old Public Safety Building once stood, now a vacant city block waiting for a something to be put there.
Then access from the Bus/rail at the 3th avenue level would be instant. Perhaps, it could have been ground with a public plaza on the top level with 4th Avenue. That would be a 200% use of the site and still have a block to either sell or build other needed services like affordable housing.
In any event, true to Seattle's contemporary architectural character, we get BLAND and inaccessible.
Design by committee = camel
We have a camel!
Art