Gov. Chris Gregoire addressed the Seattle Rotary Wednesday, previewing her new budget approach (details Thursday) and also test-marketing the kind of message she and other Democrats will be sending during the fall election season.
Nothing very surprising: The governor plans to continue mixing cuts and tax increases. She threw in some inspirational messages about how Washington state will not follow others in any race to the bottom by harming basic services. Other states? "they're mediocre!" the governor crowed, scoring off Arizona and California. She said there would also be increased efforts on helping local companies to export more.
Curiously, Gregoire took a few swings at doubters of America's resilience, harking back to the Vietnam War era: "Those who doubted us then are doubting us now. They were wrong then and they're wrong now." It's unlikely any of those doubters, past or present, were in the large audience of Rotarians, so three modestly grudging standing ovations greeted the governor.
She was more at home in government-speak, providing a peek at her new budget approach. There will be eight critical questions to be asked of each department before their budgets are increased or shuffled. (What, no questions asked before?) Gregoire didn't evoke former Gov. Gary Locke's system of zero-based budgeting, but did say evasively that she would deploy "zero-based budgeting for a start." Citizens will be asked to submit suggestions, and there will be a statewide tour to tout the new, more rigorous budgeting approach.
Whether this message that good times are coming soon can get the state through the current budget year remains an open question. It all depends on when, and whether, Congress will vote significant relief to the states in the fall. The current state budget assumes it will come, but if there is a firm congressional no before the elections, as seems increasingly likely, Gregoire may be forced to call a special session in August, on the eve of the primary. Otherwise, the strategy appears to cross fingers and wait for a lame-duck Congress to vote the unpopular increased spending after the November election.
Gregoire took a few questions and shed some new light on some issues. Asked about voter initiatives she might favor or oppose, she edged close to supporting I-1098, the state income tax measure, saying she was "intrigued," and busy "scrutinizing" it. That seemed safely on the fence, but she then added that if I-1098 were to fail, the state would be stuck finding a way to fund new K-12 requirements. "I don't have a backup plan," she admitted.
Another question was whether Seattle was providing enough support for her position on the deep-bore waterfront tunnel. The governor, after a mild dig at Mayor Mike McGinn, who opposes the tunnel, produced an unusual argument for the tunnel. Reporting on her trip to view a transit tunnel in Vancouver (finished "on budget, ahead of schedule"), Gregoire noted that the cut-and-cover portion, which displaced lots of local businesses during construction, has drawn lawsuits from bankrupt businesses, while the bored tunnel portion has no legal challenges. She said this was one reason she opposed Mayor Greg Nickels' earlier plan for a cut-and-cover tunnel under Alaskan Way.
The gratuitous dig at Nickels was odd, since the two ended up agreeing on the tunnel plan, but it is indicative of how poor relations continue to be between Olympia and Seattle. The broader context is this: Gregoire basically took herself out of the battles over the Viaduct for a full year, leading up to her reelection in 2008. That allowed the cut-and-cover tunnel idea to die a natural death, by neglect. Ironically, Gregoire's no-show-year may have saved the Seattle waterfront from a commercial disaster. Not exactly leadership.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email






Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Wed, Jun 23, 5:54 p.m. Inappropriate
Here's how the cut/cover Tunnelite could be constructed:
Starting from the south end, the trench is dug in 1 or 2-block segments. Traffic is routed around the trench, under the AWV (which remains in operation) and returned to the surface above completed segments. Excavation debris is removed via the tunnel. The seawall is rebuilt at the same time.
Once the north portal at Pike is reached, preparations are made to detour traffic around the Lower Belltown segment. A permanent bridge over the railroad tracks at Broad Street is constructed. The AWV is decommissioned and the southern portal is connected. SR99 Traffic is diverted to Broad Street and then the north portal.
The challenge will be Lower Belltown as SR99 is rebuilt beneath Western and Elliott. The entrance south from Elliott becomes a downhill clear merge (instead of an uphill blind merge), and the exit north onto Western becomes a 2-lane, speed-reducing uphill ramp (instead of a 1-lane, speed-increasing ramp). This segment will probably take 2 years, but the AWV could be closed by 2014.
The notion of the waterfront facing a commercial disaster is disingenuous. There's no avoiding the construction mess of removing the AWV, rebuilding the seawall and Alaskan Way. Motorists will adjust to the disruption (as they should) and curiosity will attract innumerable visitors and interested parties to watch the waterfront evolve.
When honest Seattlers realize how close they came to making a horrible mistake with the DBT -- it's engineering is lousy and dangerous, and it's environmental impact is severe -- Mayor McGinn will be fully exonerated and heralded as a hero. Keep fighting, Mike.
Posted Thu, Jun 24, 5:16 a.m. Inappropriate
The state of Washington has more government jobs than manufacturing jobs. The notion that the state will aid businesses in increasing exports by creating "counselors" is the type of nonsense we gets from electeds who spent their entire career in the public sector. Gregoire hates small business, and she certainly despises free enterprise. The idea that people need to be managed is implicit in her world view. As for the tunnel, efforts to delay and obstruct are currently under way. Gregoire can run her mouth all she pleases. She's done nothing but flap her gums on the state's fiscal crisis. How's that worked out?
Posted Thu, Jun 24, 9:15 a.m. Inappropriate
Wells is still smoking his pipe, I see. Somehow he thinks that McGinn will make his cut and cover tunnel the replacement for the bored tunnel plan. Although I can understand his rationale for the C&C;, I absolutely cannot see how he can be so deluded to think that McGinn would support such a thing. In fact McGinn is quite clear that he wants to completely eliminate SR99 off the map, and move Seattle into the Age of Aquarius.
Posted Thu, Jun 24, 11:49 a.m. Inappropriate
the cut and cover tunnel Gregoire attacks as "Nickels'" was conceived, planned and pre-designed by the Washington State Department of Transportation operating then and now under the direction of a Governor named Gregoire who still cannot stop herself from suborning and speaking deceptions on the subject
Posted Fri, Jun 25, 6:39 p.m. Inappropriate
Brewser would have done us a service by printing the Governor's eight questions, as the Seattle Times did. They are neocon by nature and intent.
Governor's 8 questions
1. Is the activity an essential service?
2: Does state government have to perform the activity, or can it be provided by others?
3: Can the activity be eliminated or delayed in recessionary times?
4: Does the activity need to be paid for with state general funds? Should users pay a portion of the costs?
5: Are there federal funds or other fund sources available to support this activity?
6: Are there more cost-effective, efficient ways to do the activity?
7: Can the activity be the subject of a performance contract?
8: Can the activity be the subject of a performance incentive?
The meaning of an "essential" state services is defined by law. Education and prisons are essential. Health care and housing the homeless are not.
The Corrections budget is our equivalent of the defense budget. Rather than take it for granted, the Legislature should eliminate prison time for all non-violent offenders in favor of alternative sentencing and use the operations and capital Corrections budget to provide residential drug treatment and to build low-income housing so prisoners and the working poor have some stability in their lives. Only the late Republican centrist Norm Meleng was a strong enough political leader to lower the sentences for non-violent offenders by 25%. The next Legislature should finish the job and put the funds to more "essential" uses.