You would love my commute. Not the time spent, at least not in sum, but the train, in particular. Even as I spend every day in public, with the shop, it is not as public as the transport. And it may, in simple fact, be the weird particular ingredient that keeps NYC, and to some extent Chicago, sane and beyond the grit that should otherwise ruin them.
Mine is a mini, a 35-minute train ride, from Mukilteo to King Street Station Seattle, on a new Sounder train that rattles somehow worse than an old one, in seats upholstered from a failed Boeing database of fabric and taste, seats fit for no form, with an overhead rack so misproportioned that every arrival warns to not hit your head. There is no mass transit DNA in this state, there is only the Company DNA, and the only company was Boeing, All work starts somewhere between 6-8 and gets off before 5, so there are no trains after 7 am and none later than 5:30 and none on weekends.
The system bears no relation to customers other than workers, none to tourists nor day travellers. It has, however, made a wonderful link to professional football and baseball games, leaving two hours before many home games and departing one hour after conclusion, however long that may be. The game trains are packed, bringing down the Everett/Mukilteo/Edmonds corridor fans much happier to not have an auto for this fest.
It is the people, during the week, that is what you would love. It is the only time in the Northwest that you are with such a cross section. Restaurants are only a slice, traffic is an isolation, home has few neighbors, we have no public square nor weather for one. Such a crew, the people — Jimmy Carter is there, and Billy Bob Thornton, they sit together, a couple Tammy Fayes, one Emmylou Harris, six balding male nerds in our car, their HR boss (a fine-humored woman from Finland), a skittle of youths, man and woman, heading straight downtown to their Dot.Com aeries. Even a kind of Steve Ballmer, in an open-faced database way, is there, not wearing a jacket, as the winds and rain howl and he helps a passenger up onto the railcar. He is followed by a stern medical commuter, pulling her wheelie that has only plastic wheels and sounds, in the early morn, like a muffler dragging — a sound so corrosive it could be the swab before waterboarding. There are even two men in felt fedoras, as it once was in straighter times.
The train does not quite meet the ferry, but they are in negotiations about collaborating. The Sound Transit employee, with his umbrella and brochures, will cheerfully admit he has no certain information when the train is coming and no power as to when it will depart.
There are no gazers on the train, as the route meanders down the coast along the water's edge across to the Olympics, but computers and cell phones have stolen all that attention. No one looks up or out: that time has been long sold, and killer whales could do the hokey pokey in the morning Sound and only a prompt would bring the viewers.
Much of the winter has seen the tracks closed by mudslides. They seem benign enough but they have the momentum of error, the error of plopping your trophy home far too close to the cliff's edge. As we travel down hill to Seattle, it is a rare presentation of hillside hopes — hope of stairs, hope of forts, hope of playhouses, hope of platforms — and few have won. Most are crippled, strange visions of Home Depot joints and connectors that only held through Labor Day, and now, like Libyan rebels, just want to go home. There are even brief glimpses of stolen viewpoints, plastic chairs sneaked down on the hillside to hold a moment. The crews, mobilized to keep this now popular transit open, must have many moments that are vignettes of the hobo, sneaking the view.
We never do see any cars on this route, and soon are crossing the Ballard Locks (no one down there as yet in March) past the parking lot for the National Guard, the new Whole Foods, the Sculpture Park, and dark tunnel behind the Market and finally King Street station. With luck, the train from Tacoma is not up yet. Those trains fill all their cars to their brim, making the rush up stairs slow going, for there are ten people with ten speeds, and the stairs, from both ends of the train — stairs that once looked like the oddest idea of all, are swamped with the outrush. This is transit, and for Seattle, this is its first act.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email






Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Thu, Mar 31, 12:17 p.m. Inappropriate
Fine piece of writing, Peter.
Posted Fri, Apr 1, 8 a.m. Inappropriate
Love this, especially the "hillside hopes."
Posted Fri, Apr 1, 10 a.m. Inappropriate
And then there’s the shimmering beauty of the Sounder numbers.
Lots of unfilled seats. Ridership only 86% of Sound Transit’s announced 2010 target.
Lots of public support. Subsidy from everyone’s sales taxes in 2010 kicked in $12.74 per person per trip just to cover operating costs. (Don’t even ask what the numbers are if the capital cost is added, too). So at Sound Transit’s sales tax rate of nine-tenths of a cent per dollar, the 200-day suburban commuter making 400 trips on the train harvests $5000 in yearly subsidy from his or her fellow citizens. The populace contributed that by spending over half a million dollars of their hard-earned money to generate the tax!
That’s for one commuter. A lot of people must be pulling that train! Your tax dollars at work! Luckily, there aren’t many people on the train: less than 350 per trip. They do complain, though. At more than twice the rate of customer complaints Sound Transit sets as its target. No one, however, off the train could complain that it’s making a dent on the I-5 traffic experience the rest of the world so enjoys.
But the biggest problem is the number of people who really do think this is the future of public transportation in Seattle – while Metro starves and bus services used by hundreds of thousands of people a day are headed for cuts. The public watching the shiny Sounder trains go by are looking at the picture of a transit future that leaves most people stuck. In traffic, or waiting at a bus shelter, or walking in the rain, or just going nowhere.
Please, a better, fairer, more efficient transit vision. We need transit advocates that advocate for transit. Maybe it’s time to start collecting signatures.
Posted Fri, Apr 1, 10:23 a.m. Inappropriate
Bitter much, Mr. Mapes? I mean MacDonald.
What a surprise that the former Secretary of Washington State Highways doesn't like transit, or at least anything that doesn't require rubber, roads and gas.
We won, you lost in 2008. Move along now. Enjoy your taxpayer-funded pension and retirement benefits. Spare us your bile.
Posted Fri, Apr 1, 11:44 a.m. Inappropriate
Bus rider MacDonald is saying that for the public money invested, buses provide far more service to far more people in far more places than passenger railroads like Sounder. With public transit, money matters and equity matters.
Read in Wikipedia how the Bus Riders Union (BRU)in Los Angeles took on an agency that invested in rail and cut bus service to pay for the trains. Now there is a BRU in Vancouver, Canada, concerned about investment in rail at the expense of bus service.
Posted Fri, Apr 1, 2:24 p.m. Inappropriate
And guess what? The 2008 vote added more bus hours between Everett and Seattle. I believe many of those extra hours are in service right now. We can have it all.
Posted Sat, Apr 2, 11:14 a.m. Inappropriate
I support Sounder and LINK LRT more for their positive affect upon station area economic development than initial transit service. The connection between development and transportation is deceptively miscalculated by the highway robbery club. If money is apprpriated to local economies instead of automobile-related corporate business interests, responsible clubmembers are demoted. MacDonald's reputation was ruined by his mishandling the Alaskan Way viaduct replacement. The deep-bore tunnel is a mad dog that will bite more big fat behinds until it's put down. MacDonald should compile a list of his more credible accomplishments as Wsdot chief, because his DBT dog is trained to kill.
Posted Sat, Apr 2, 11:53 a.m. Inappropriate
Thank you Dinosaur for your follow up on my comment about buses vs trains.
Indeed, Sound Transit took a sliver of the money from the 2008 voter approved doubling of the agency's tax take and added two more route 510 express buses from Everett to Seattle in the morning, and added one northbound in the mid afternoon. Sound Transit was able to do this in addition to building the agency's end of year 2010 cash position to over $800 million in anticipation of big rail tunnel construction expenditures.
That said, my point on Doug MacDonald's point relates to the big picture of the voter-approved, enormous rail emphasis of Sound Transit coming at the expense of bus service. For more detail, see my earlier essays at http://www.bettertransport.info/pitf/Prop1BusExpansion.htm and at http://www.bettertransport.info/pitf/regionaltransittaxes.htm.
The problem I describe reveals itself in an overall increase in cost per transit rider in the region overall, described in my testimony to a Sound Transit Public Hearing on March 17 as follows:
"Sound Transit lately, according to the National Transit Database of FTA,
consumes about 17% of the total OPERATING funds for all 5 agencies, but
delivers only 11% of the ridership. Sound Transit’s cost per ride in this
comparison comes out at $7, while the other four agencies are at $5.
Sound Transit at 15 years of age promises this cost comparison will get
better by its 20th birthday, but past performance makes this commitment
shaky.
"CAPITAL spending of Sound Transit exceeds that of the other four
transit agencies combined by at least 100% and ranging up to 700%
in recent years. Tunnel boring machines (TBMs) are one reason, and
Sound Transit has not yet launched its latest three."
As described by Peter Miller in the essay stimulating this thread of comment, trains can provide a sweet ride to those relatively few folks who board them. But Sound Transit's train stations collectively both now and in the future don't serve most of the regional geography where transit riders need to go, yet suck up a disproportional percentage of regional transit resources.
The current financial troubles of the non-Sound-Transit public transit agencies in this region, like Metro, are a direct result of how transit resources are collected, distributed, and spent. More transit funding elections lie ahead of us. Sound Transit is winning. Bus riders are losing.
Posted Sat, Apr 2, 12:01 p.m. Inappropriate
Wells,
A deep bore tunnel as a replacement for the Viaduct was rejected during DOT Secretary MacDonald's period of service, which ended in the summer of 2007.
The decision to build a deep bore tunnel was made by Governor Gregoire in late 2008.
Posted Sat, Apr 2, 9:16 p.m. Inappropriate
jNiles, Wsdot rigged their AWV replacement studies from 2001 on. Wsdot began cut/cover tunnel studies with the most expensive, an indication their intent was to make it "prohibitively" expensive. Wsdot knew all along about the the 6-lane 'stacked' version now in the DEIS, that can be constructed while leaving the AWV in place and operating, thus reducing construction disruption. Wsdot simply didn't want the public to know.
Likewise, Wsdot exaggerated the number of stoplights necessary for a surface boulevard option to similarly induce public opposition. All this happened during MacDonald's term as Wsdot chief. He's complicit and his reputation is ruined. Much like Grace Crunican's ruined reputation followed her to Clackamas County where her employment application there was rejected.
The early deep-bore tunnel studied was a "dual bore"; more expensive and just as risky as the current bored tunnel.
Posted Mon, Apr 4, 8:26 a.m. Inappropriate
Thanks for the ride, Peter. As a Whidbey Islander since 1975, I've long thought it odd that we couldn't hop on a train and go south to Seattle. Thirty-five years later, it's real. Now, if they'd just add service on the weekends. I contacted Sound Transit about additional service and pretty much got the "not in your lifetime" response. In the meantime, it's a welcome substitute for crawling on I-5. Plus, free WiFi, unlike the Washington State Ferries.
Posted Mon, Apr 4, 3:33 p.m. Inappropriate
It's no coincidence that Doug MacDonald and John Niles both do work for the Discovery Institute: both men have been all over the map with their flip-flopping transportation theories (never practise, mind you). Combine the goofy Intelligent Design - inspired transport theory with each man's personal vendettas against ST / rail, and you get countless column inches of petty, useless & extremely repetitive pablum.
The thing John Niles forgets to mention: back in its heyday, Niles' (now) ragtag group of anti-rail ideologues was PROMOTING commuter rail as a replacement for light rail. Since those hacks relied on politicizing transportation, rather than analyzing actual data, they told us commuter rail - by its very nature - would be cheaper than light rail, because it would operate on existing track (The Discovery Institute continues to promote that distortion to this day)
Niles' CETA took a vote in 2003 to support a "bail out" of Sounder North, after it was floundering due to cost overruns, delays, etc. The idea was to kill Link light rail and do track upgrades everywhere, so commuter rail could replace the evil that was light rail. Quote from a CETA member who attended that vote: "we felt the infrastructure upgrade for Sounder was a better investment and certainly far more popular and far less damaging to the communities along the route, than Link thru the Rainier Valley. Our hope is that an investment in Sounder will provide political cover to our WA congressional delegation to allow them to let Link die".
So, the next time John Niles pretends to use numbers and calculations to defend his fringe opinions, remember the long history of ideology and distortion that marks his & CETA's anti-transit activism. Indeed, after CETA's bill to replace Link with commuter rail died in Olympia (never a good idea to have rabidly anti-transit Republicans carry your water if you want to maintain your status as a "pro-transit" group) Niles & his band of disaffected wingnuts moved onward with their next pet transport technology: monorail.
We all know how well that CETA / Discovery Institute project worked out.
Perhaps if Niles decided one day to promote a particular technology or project BECAUSE IT WAS A GOOD IDEA, he wouldn't have such a long string of failures marking his three decades jihad against rail.
The latest Trojan Horse for John Niles is so-called "Bus Rapid Transit" It's always a concept - never an actual real-world plan backed by actual data or realistic policies. And whenever a plan to actually FUND Busted Rabid Transit is put forward, John Niles goes mum, and the handful of organizations that fund his work and people he affiliates with always end up OPPOSING more/better bus service. (yet another pitfall to allying oneself with people who are trying to defeat the things you supposedly stand for.)
Articles like this one illustrate why rail will continue to expand, while the Niles & MacDonald freeway model will continue to fail: the rubber tires on those buses aren't going to spin very fast so long as new dedicated rights of way are not created, and so long as population, jobs and congestion continue to grow at an impressive clip. If you want proof of this, check out the current debate in Olympia over the extension of HOT lanes up 405. All the people and think tanx John Niles affiliates with were out in force opposing the bill. After a struggle, and after the legislature made sure no tolling revenues could EVER be used to support bus service, HB 1382 remains alive. To his credit, Doug MacDonald actually testified in favor of the bill, along with his successor at the State DOT. As in, they need the cash. And they want to move MORE cars via congestion pricing.
But in his testimony at the Senate Transportation Committee, Doug MacDonald was silent on using tolling revenues to fund buses, which are in dire need of funding - especially the limited stop bus service MacDonald promotes, since long haul buses are notorious for lower farebox revenues.
It was funny when Doug MacDonald tipped his hat to Kemper Freeman and his massive $20 billion 405 corridor plan. The EIS predicted 1,000 new bus patrons. In the world of the road king, I guess spending billions to render 1,000 transit users is deemed "a success"
Posted Mon, Apr 4, 3:44 p.m. Inappropriate
As for MacDonald's typical grousing about "empty seats on Sounder" - has he checked similar numbers for suburban bus routes?
And how's about applying MacDonald's petty "logic" to his cherished freeways. Many freeways remain 95% empty during a large portion of the day, especially since the recession hit. Should we shut those freeways down mid-day and nightly because they are so terribly inefficient? And so amazingly expensive to operate? Why not shut down partially used freeways for good if they are underutilized? And get rid of those 80% empty ferries, while you're at it...
Personal vendettas do not make for good public policy, whether the Discovery Institute is paying you or not.
Posted Thu, Apr 7, 10:55 a.m. Inappropriate
Sounder north is like your piece.
Brilliant artistry...but not a solution to any pragmatic issue.
Posted Thu, Apr 7, 12:28 p.m. Inappropriate
First of all, what OLD Sounder are you talking about? As for thew cars rattling, I'm assuming you don't actually listen, because in comparison to much of the other commuter cars in the states these things are limousines. Ever been on Metra? Those rat traps carry way more people( a good thing) but amenities could be considered air conditioning and not much else.
What do you mean it doesn't meet the ferry? Where in the world have you been? It does indeed show up ten minutes before the departure of each respective run of either the Cathlamet, Kitittas, or Kitsap. Obviously you haven't read the schedule. I catch this EVERY day.
Yes, there have been plenty of gazers on the train. Maybe you are like many of the 40-50 somethings with their heads crammed into their computers, coughing on others(like last night), yapping on their phones, and banging their heads on the luggage racks because they aren't bright enough to look up. I once cranked up mu headphones( which I rarely wear, btw) because one woman's conversation on the phone was so loud. After she had been off of it for five minutes she turned around to glare at me as if my volume was all of a sudden to loud for her.
Overall your piece is poorly written, and tilts toward an inaccurate portrait of Sound Transit. I don't particularly care for ST, but you've done a disservice to them and to the paying public. I wish you had a better grasp of this train and the totality of its contribution to the north end. Maybe next time you'll do a better job in showing the public why they should ride it instead of showing why they shouldn't.
Posted Fri, Apr 8, 12:57 p.m. Inappropriate
My comments related to transit have stimulated MadisonAve to join the comment stream here with a personal attack on my work and ideas as linked to his inaccurate theories of my motivation and associations.
The online record of all his anonymous comments at http://crosscut.com/account/MadisonAve/ shows that what he writes now matches his typical past ways of describing people he does not agree with on the topic of Sound Transit's programs and plans.
I don't know what MadisonAve's motivations are and wish he'd stop speculating on mine. He's written that he is not paid by Sound Transit, and I believe him. Simply put, I suspect we both care about the future of regional transportation, but have radically different views on the best direction.
My stream of comments into Crosscut is at http://crosscut.com/account/jniles/ . I'd take back some of what I said there if I could.
So MadisonAve is correct that my views on some aspects of transportation have evolved, but my opinion is ongoing that Sound Transit costs too much and does too little. The latest indication: Ridership for the Seattle light rail line in 2010 came out one million boardings below the annual forecast made well after the recession began.
I cite evidence in the March 17 Public Hearing statement of Coalition for Effective Transportation Alternatives' (CETA) on the disturbing relationship between Sound Transit and other bus transit. The two page statement is posted at http://ow.ly/d/czc .