The Seattle School Board is blowing up! A debate is opening up over a proposal made by School Board President Michael DeBell, which would state what are appropriate and inappropriate actions for the School Board to make, reports Seattle Times education reporter David Rosenthal. This is apparently in response to two newly elected members, Sharon Peaslee and Marty McLaren, whose involvement is rumoured to have overwhelmed Interim Superintendent Susan Enfield and her staff. According to Rosenthal, DeBell said the new members might also have affected Enfield's decision not to seek a permanent position.
Crosscut Editor-in-Chief David Brewster first discussed the new members' likely influence on Enfield in a Dec. 19 article. "The decision, unexplained for the most part, almost certainly stemmed from the surprising fall election, where two insurgents got elected, turning the reform coalition from a 5-2 majority into a 3-4 minority," he said. "With a split board, Enfield quickly ran up her flag for other employment. Uh-oh."
Of course, if School Board members were able to goad one superintendent into quitting, then this may suggest future difficulties ahead. That may be what DeBell is hoping to avoid with his proposal, which was put on the agenda for a meeting today (Jan. 25).
Turns out, "Barefoot Bandit" Colton Harris-Moore isn't the sympathetic, tragic figure everyone wanted him to be. In December, Island County Superior Court Judge Vickie Churchill imposed a forgiving seven-year sentence, taking into account Harris-Moore's "apparent remorse, his troubled childhood and previously undiagnosed psychiatric problems." His case was called tragic and he himself was termed by the judge a "triumph of human spirit."
But Harris-Moore had little nice to say about anyone. He wrote in intercepted emails that he appreciated the judge for what she did, but said "at the same time her words were greater than her actions," and that she still could have done more, reports Everett Herald writer Jackson Holtz (the author of a book about Harris-Moore). Towards police and prosecutors, he was even more harsh, calling them "swine" and "fools." Harris-Moore went a step further with Island County Sheriff Mark Brown, crowning him as "the king of swine."
Harris-Moore is scheduled to be sentenced Friday in U.S. District Court in Seattle on the federal level. With the bitterness seen in Harris-Moore's words, will the federal court be so sympathetic?
Nobody really loves Gov. Christine Gregoire's proposal of a $3.7 billion transportation package, according to Herald writer Jerry Cornfield. The Legislature has a hard enough time closing the current budget without adding more onto it, and people are pretty sick of taxes, if the recent popularity of initiatives is an indicator. But the biggest protestors at the first public hearings yesterday, it should be noted, were oil industry representatives (there would be new fee of $1.50 per barrel of oil refined into petroleum products) and, of course, Tim Eyman, who called the proposed tax unthinkable and "unconstitutional."
Representatives from different cities, counties, and transit districts said that they understood the need for repairs and maintenence, but that they thought the funding needed to be distributed better, Cornfield reports. They were afraid that all the funding would be concentrated in cities, neglecting towns and rural areas.
One can only wonder that, if major funding is pushed back too far, whether driving along I-5 would be similar to the post-apocalyptic scenes of Mad Max.
Is Mitt Romney really a filthy rich person who pays less money in taxes than everyone else in America? The first part, maybe. But Danny Westneat contends that the second part may not be true at all. In a bit of humility, he states, "I must be some sort of slacker, because I have to admit: I pay less than Mitt."
Westneat goes on, however, to say that the same is probably true of most of us (and certainly this is true of the intern writing this article). According to the IRS, more than 90 percent of Americans don't pay as much proportionally in taxes as Mitt Romney does. In fact, when it comes to the federal income tax —which is what Romney released — nearly half of Americans pay zero or actually receive money from tax credits, Westneat says. Furthermore, the tax statements Romney released does not include corporate taxes, which would hit the presidential-hopeful's wallet more than the average citizen's.
Of course, it's still possible to say all sorts of dirty words about Romney not being charitable enough, but that might be plain mean.
Do senators smile? According to a new tool developed by Dan Nguyen, a developer/journalist at ProPublica, the answer is: sortive. While some, such as Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), have bright, beaming smiles, others, labeled "The Non-Smilers," manage somehow to give the appearance of smiling without moving the ends of their lips upwards. Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) has an especially intimidating and stern "smile," but Atlantic writer Megan Garber notes that Sen. Al Franken has the most depressed smile according to the tool. His smirk is half-hearted and his eyebrows and eyes unexpressive, devoid of feeling. Poor guy — being a senator must not be all it's cracked up to be. Five of the 10 "biggest smiles" belonged to women members of the Senate, but neither of Washington state's members, Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell, made that list. Still, seriousness apparently hasn't stopped Sen. Cantwell from wanting to be re-elected.
On Wednesday afternoon, The Seattle Weekly's Ellis Conklin dug a little more into the smiling issue, and found that Murray and Cantwell, did pretty well even if they missed the Top 10 list. He recalled, too, the 2000 senatorial campaign in which Cantwell was sometimes called Maria Can't Smile.
Seattle Times "Proposal spurs emotional debate over Seattle School Board power"
Everett Herald, "Colton Harris-Moore calls case against him 'high propaganda,' court documents allege"
Everett Herald, "Critics blast governor's transporation plan tax increase"
Seattle Times, "One more time: Our taxes are OK"
The Atlantic, "Ranking the members of the U.S. Senate (According to Their Smiles)"
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email






Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Wed, Jan 25, 12:11 p.m. Inappropriate
"Sharon Peaslee and Marty McLaren, whose involvment is rumoured to have overwhelmed Interim Superintendent Susan Enfield and her staff". Please provide specifics. Why wouldn't these individuals want information? Crosscut continues to provide rumors instead of actual news.
Anyone that thinks Marty McLaren is an insurgent..have you ever seen her? Beware.
Posted Wed, Jan 25, 1:19 p.m. Inappropriate
Wow. If you think the Seattle School Board is blowing up, you must think that the legislature in Olympia is getting carpet bombed and that Washington D.C. is under nuclear attack.
Tone down the manufactured conflict a bit, will you? The Seattle School Board is fine. They work together well and do a good job of discussing issues - at least so far as they have in the few meetings they have held since the election of two new Board members.
I know that the editors at Crosscut have a vested interest in the school board's failure, but it isn't happening.
Thanks, however, for reminding us of David Brewster's transparent propaganda. That was good for a laugh.
Posted Wed, Jan 25, 7:09 p.m. Inappropriate
I've been posting about Colton Harris-Moore and his mother Pam Kohler for the past six months. You can read my recent post about his trash talkin' problems right here.
http://skipdemuth.com/2012/01/25/another-post-on-the-barefoot-bandit-i-cant-help-myself/
or www.skipdemuth.com
Posted Thu, Jan 26, 12:12 p.m. Inappropriate
This is apparently in response to two newly elected members, Sharon Peaslee and Marty McLaren, whose involvement is rumoured to have overwhelmed Interim Superintendent Susan Enfield and her staff.
No, it's NOT the newly elected members as BOTH DeBell and Enfield have publicly said. Why is Crosscut repeating a rumor?
"With a split board, Enfield quickly ran up her flag for other employment. Uh-oh."
Enfield has publicly said the election had nothing to do with her decision. Indeed, when she spoke of this policy at last night's Board meeting, she said there had been issues since last April. The two new members came on in late November.
"Of course, if School Board members were able to goad one superintendent into quitting, then this may suggest future difficulties ahead."
No one was trying to "goad" Dr. Enfield into leaving. No one and again,unless you can provide actual facts on that, you should not say it.
On the subject of Seattle Public Schools, Crosscut seems to be engaging in first-class rumor-mongering and you have to wonder why.
Posted Thu, Jan 26, 1:22 p.m. Inappropriate
It's amazing to read allegations in Crosscut that I've heard from no other source. Crosscut broke the news to me that I have used up excessive amounts of staff time demanding information. No one else has even implied that. Crosscut also broke the news that I goaded Dr. Enfield into making her recent decision. Crosscut has never interviewed me, either.
To set the record straight, no one to my knowledge goaded Dr. Enfield. She made this decision independently and has stated repeatedly that it has nothing to do with the board. McLaren and myself have been thrilled at the graciousness with which district staff have offered to meet with us and bring us up to speed. Most requests for information have been made in these meetings. And on the topic of procedure 1620, we voted to take it off the agenda last night so that we will have more time to work on it in meetings of the whole board. If we take the time to craft it carefully and collaboratively it will have the support of the entire board.
In my view, the best kind of relationship between Board and Supt is neither "micromanaging" nor "rubberstamping." It's a strong collaboration in support of a shared vision, with each party working within the bounds of governance and management. There must be flexibility, respect and a commitment to honest, constructive communications. This is what I will work towards in crafting this very important policy.
Posted Fri, Jan 27, 8:38 a.m. Inappropriate
"The Seattle School Board is blowing up! "
Really? New Directors Sharon Peaslee and Marty McLaren are responsible for blowing up the Seattle School Board? No, the blame for that can be placed squarely on the Seattle Times, Crosscut, and to a lesser extent the Seattle Weekly. A vendetta is being waged against these two capable women and Board President Michael DeBell has aided and abetted it. The intent is clear -spread gossip and innuendo that discredits Peaslee, McLaren, Smith-Blum, and Patu; cast Susan Enfield as a victim; decry the disfunctional micromanaging group. Indeed this poisons the environment for a productive search for a new Superintendent. Crosscut knows this as does Michael DeBell.
If the working relationships of the Seattle School Board disintegrate, the Seattle Times,Crosscut and Michael DeBell should be hanging their heads but sadly they will be too busy doing victory laps.
Posted Tue, Jan 31, 12:03 p.m. Inappropriate
Sharon Peaslee states: "Crosscut has never interviewed me, either."
I'm finding Crosscut's reporting interesting. They have continually slammed our new board and existing members. Crosscut never interviewed Ms. Peaslee!!
It appears Board President DeBell hasn't been working with his colleagues; he prefers slither behind his colleagues, use the press, divide the board and community to further his agenda. Crosscut and folks at Seattle Times Editorial board and Seattle Weekly are part of this non-sense.
I'll be sure to inform the greater public of your irresponsible actions.
We will continue to watch and call out all members involved in this non-sense. Any chance Mr. Bridges is out there?
Here is the good news: People aren't stupid.