Given the rivalry with Oklahoma City over the Sonics, we're not too likely to emulate politics from Oklahoma, but here's one political ploy that may be worth borrowing, particularly now that Tim Eyman, the initiative king, is riding high again.
Attention John Ladenburg, Pierce County Executive who is gearing up to challenge Rob McKenna for Attorney General in 2008. Here's an Oklahoma six-shooter.
The story, as recounted by The Wall Street Journal's editorial page ($), concerns Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson, who has taken aim at a key weapon of initiative-gatherers, the use of out-of-state petition collectors. The AG is pursuing felony charges against the Eyman equivalents in Oklahoma, saying they violated state law by bringing in petition gatherers from out of state.
The citizens in question launched a signature campaign in 2005 to enact a Taxpayer Bill of Rights, or Tabor, to cap state government spending increases. The story follows a familiar script. The Tabor advocates gather 300,000 signatures, well beyond the 219,000 needed to get the measure on the ballot. A court challenge rules the signatures invalid because nonresidents of the state had collected many of them. Edmondson then indicted the campaigners, even though the court decision on the residency requirement is being challenged in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
The whole issue is now going ballistic. The leaders of the Citizens in Charge group face 10 years in prison, even though they claim the state had told them that nonresidents could simply move to the state and declare themselves to be residents. Edmondson, a Democrat, is accused of grandstanding in the name of gaining higher office.
Could this be a foretaste of an escalation of the war with Tim Eyman? Maybe so, but considering the way Gov. Gregoire and the state Democratic Party are now behaving, rushing to enact I-747 even though the state Supreme Court invalidated it, Eyman would still dictate state tax policy while banging the bars in jail.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email





Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Wed, Nov 21, 4:32 p.m. Inappropriate
A PUZZLING HOSTILITY: " Eyman would still dictate state tax policy while banging the bars in jail."
Wishful thinking, Mr. B.
I sometimes wonder at the media's overt hostility to Eyman.
How is he different from (other) politicians? why does his advocacy cross a line that so rankles the commentariat? he clearly violates some rule of political behavior but I can't think what that rule that is.
Yes, many years ago I voted for one of his initiatives. And I would do so again.
Posted Wed, Nov 21, 4:32 p.m. Inappropriate
A PUZZLING HOSTILITY: " Eyman would still dictate state tax policy while banging the bars in jail."
Wishful thinking, Mr. B.
I sometimes wonder at the media's overt hostility to Eyman.
How is he different from (other) politicians? why does his advocacy cross a line that so rankles the commentariat? he clearly violates some rule of political behavior but I can't think what that rule that is.
Yes, many years ago I voted for one of his initiatives. And I would do so again.
Posted Thu, Nov 22, 7:21 a.m. Inappropriate
Pay Him Off to Go Away: Since he is into the initiative business for the money it would probably be cheaper just to pay him off to go away. He is a Republican after all and the recent experience with Jack Abramoff would indicate that they usually can be bought for a rather small sum.
Posted Thu, Nov 22, 7:37 a.m. Inappropriate
Would that be Prop 1 Ladenberg for AG?: Sorry,
IF there is someone deeper in the pockets of special interest lobbies than Tim Eyeman, it could only be Mr. Ladenberg. After hearing him speak on behalf of Prop 1 it became apparent he was addicted to O-P-M. Other Peoples Money.
Posted Thu, Nov 22, 8:31 a.m. Inappropriate
Bring on Ladenburg: John Ladenburg is a no nonsense former prosecutor who cuts through noise and get things done. He'd make a fine Attorney General.
Let's hope Ladenburg takes on Rob McKenna. It'd be a wake up campaign that would pit two well qualified people against each other and a real race.
John Ladenburg is no shrinking violet. It'd be fun to watch McKenna contend with an aggressive credible opponent.
Posted Thu, Nov 22, 9:01 a.m. Inappropriate
Ladenburg will lose if he runs for AG: Ladenburg has proven he will say anything to anyone to get what he wants, look at prop 1. I hope he does run. With one of the most crime ridden cities in America as his crowning achievement, why wouldn't the rest of the State want to be like Tacoma/Lakewood? He is also a screw-up as PRSC head.
Posted Thu, Nov 22, 1:26 p.m. Inappropriate
STILL PUZZLED: OK, rcr says Eyman is a "Republican" and has something to do with "Jack Abramof" I am unaware that Eyman has any connection to Abramof and I think that assertion is mistaken. He may be a card-carrying Republican, I am not so sure of that either. Cameron says his hand is "deep in the pockets of the special interests" (which I interpret to mean any interest not supported by Cameron).
Eyman takes money from people who have an interest in legislation. As far as I know this is legal. "Special interests" give money to politicians all the time...it's how politicians get re-elected. Businesses, unions, various "interest" associations give money to legislators with, I assume, the intent to have influence on legislation. It is called campaign contributions but we all know that is only a partial description.
Eyman promotes for a constituency that is does not make a big noise in Olympia, the taxpayers. Big taxpayers, like Microsoft or Boeing or Paccar do some lobbying in Olympia and I presume they get at least some of what they seek. The beneficiaries of Eyman's initiatives represent a much broader part of our population and I think he deserves the appellation
"populist", a term that is usually reserved for people with no visible Republican (or taxpayer) sympathies.
Eyman is a public figure who is fair game for insults and the snorting dismissal from various talking heads and columnists, (witness even the august Mr. B., "rattling the bars", above).
I still have to wonder why.
Posted Wed, Nov 28, 6:18 p.m. Inappropriate
What is Brewster's political philosophy, if any?: An astonishingly cynical article. Brewster says nothing to contradict the perception that what's happening in Oklahoma is a glaring travesty of justice. Yet he simultaneously claims that Oklahoma Attorney General Edmondson's antics constitute "one political ploy that may be worth borrowing..."
Paul Jacob, Susan Johnson, and Rick Carpenter are facing ten years in prison for...aiding and abetting democracy? And Edmondson's kind of vicious assault on three innocent persons is worthy of emulation? Such is the sober conclusion produced by whatever passes for Brewster's political principles--i.e., squash one's political opponents by any means necessary, no matter what damage it does to innocent persons or to the political rights of all of us?
How can such an approach to politics be defended? Of course it can't be. And, notably, Brewster doesn't bother to try. Nor do any of the readers who implicity endorse his sentiment.
Readers who are interested in justice should visit the Free Paul Jacob web site and get the facts about this case.