Kindle catches fire and flak in the blogosphere
Now that the hype has subsided, what is Kindle?
It's too expensive (Wall Street Journal). Yet it sold out immediately.
No it didn't, it can't be selling well at all (Motley Fool) and the price will plummet.
It's really ugly but it has a lot of potential (ZDNet).
Hardly anyone has one yet but the consumer ratings on Amazon's own site say it sucks.
It includes free, wireless, cellular broadband service (New York Times) and you can
... fill the Kindle with your own documents and photos – by e-mail. You, or your authorized minions, can e-mail Word, PDF, JPEG and text files directly to your Kindle's special address – including any of the 20,000 free, out-of-copyright e-books at Gutenberg.org.
Amazon charges 10 cents for each e-mailed document; if even that's too rich for your blood, you can also transfer them free from a Mac or PC, over a U.S.B. cable.
This feature means that you can look over documents, contracts and user guides while you're on the road – without a laptop.
But the battery doesn't last long enough (Washington Post). Wait, no, yes it does (Gizmodo).
You have to use a real computer to cancel RSS subscriptions (Wired).
"It looks like a piece of medical equipment" (Journalism.co.uk).
It's "#1 in Kindle store" (Atlantic)!
It's not the next iPod (Times of London):
Now, I might realise that every technological shift is met by people not understanding the point of it – who would need to carry their entire music library around with them on an iPod when they had a Walkman? And one day I may look back on my Luddite reaction to the Kindle with shame. But probably not. Because it was and is perfectly plausible to think you might be listening to, say, the Killers, and suddenly realise that actually you wanted to hear Jeff Beal's soundtrack to the television show Monk. A desire to hear something different is hard-wired into our brains: that's why, before the almighty iPod, there were jukeboxes.
But who thinks: "Well, I'm certainly enjoying this murder mystery, and I can't wait to find out whodunnit, but I must just read some bits from another 200 books first. And, while I'm at it, I should go to Wikipedia and find out who composed the soundtrack to Monk"? No one, is who. Call me linear, but I want to start a book, read it, finish it, and then I'll read another book.










Comments:
Posted Sat, Nov 24, 6:32 a.m. inappropriate
It has DRM, for Pete's sake!: That would disqualify it from consideration right there, even if it wasn't from anti-union Amazon, which I boycott as a matter of course, and which has never received one thin dime from me.
I read plenty of (public domain) books on my HP IPAQ 6515 cell phone and PDA, which runs the entire Windows suite and fits in my shirt pocket. Right now I am reading "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" while in the ferry line. I can listen to some Coltrane with the same device while I am doing that.
So up yours, Bezos. Between the Seattle Public Library, the King County Library, ABEbooks, and my local indies, this avid book reader hereby declares you irrelevant.
Posted Sun, Nov 25, 8:20 p.m. inappropriate
RE: It has DRM, for Pete's sake!: It's interesting that so many people proudly proclaim that they will never use an ebook reader...that they love "real" books...that they are "linear" (which I assume means that they never consult a dictionary when they run across an unfamiliar term) and etc etc Why is it so important to so many to stake out that territory? As if it is some sort of point-of-pride to reject this possible new technology? If you don't like it don't buy it. But the ebook seems to jab people somewhere that prompts them to react with some degree of passion and hardly the indifference one would expect if they really didn't care.
Personally I don't think that the Kindle will succeed as configured if only because of DRM. But Amazon has the horsepower to see it through and so I suspect that they will hit on the right formula in the next few years. At least I hope so because I look forward to someone developing a great ebook reader, though I suspect that Apple will do it first as all it has to do is increase the screen size for its IPod and iPhone.
Posted Tue, Nov 27, 8:52 a.m. inappropriate
RE: It has DRM, for Pete's sake!: David Sucher says:
"It's interesting that so many people proudly proclaim that they will never use an ebook reader...that they love "real" books...that they are "linear" (which I assume means that they never consult a dictionary when they run across an unfamiliar term) and etc etc Why is it so important to so many to stake out that territory?"
---
Surely you're not talking about me, David, after I just got done saying:
"I read plenty of (public domain) books on my HP IPAQ 6515 cell phone and PDA, which runs the entire Windows suite and fits in my shirt pocket. Right now I am reading "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" while in the ferry line. I can listen to some Coltrane with the same device while I am doing that."