Danny Westneat: In Eastern Washington, the Great Depression is not forgotten
U.S. Congress »About that Oregon arrow-manufacturer's tax break: It's not what it seems
Business / Technology »Bill Virgin on the 'perps' at WaMu: 'It is not a crime in this country to be bad at business'
Health / Medicine »The King County budget crisis threatens the public health agency with 'death by thousand cuts'
Law / Justice »Changes are urged for the state's involuntary commitment and other laws regarding mental illness
2008 Election »Once a necessity for women, a businesslike demeanor could be hurting the governor
'He's always smiling': Dino Rossi tries to close the deal
2008 Election »How Sound Transit critics transformed an $18 billion system into $107 billion
Amid a swirl of national affairs, two rock-steady debaters
How accurate is Battle in Seattle?
How light rail drives Seattle neighborhood planning
The screws of Buildergate tighten on Dino Rossi
Congestion conjecture: Eyman's I-985
(17 comments)
Amid a swirl of national affairs, two rock-steady debaters
(15 comments)
The screws of Buildergate tighten on Dino Rossi
(15 comments)
The prospect of a POTUS with PTSD
(14 comments)
B- for McCain; B+ for Obama
(10 comments)
Dear Sen. Murray: Please don't feed the rats
(9 comments)
The high cost of an empty taxicab
(9 comments)
Belt-tightening time for the Mercer Mess?
(7 comments)
Seattle: Coming back to earth
(7 comments)
How accurate is Battle in Seattle?
(5 comments)
The rap on Oregonians: Cut us and we bleed green. Yeah, sure, when we're not indulging in public displays of affection for trees, we're recycling old Volvo parts into useful household items. Even if that's true, it doesn't mean we're swallowing green propaganda whole. Not any more, anyway. As the Portland Tribune reports, two University of Oregon profs are behind a sort of online Doubt-O-Meter that lets consumers weigh advertising claims about eco-worthy products.
As writer Toby Van Fleet reports:
Images of nature and messages of Earth-friendliness seem to be everywhere in advertising these days as companies respond to increased public awareness about climate change and resulting concern for environmental issues.
Enter UO profs Deborah Morrison and Kim Sheehan, who teamed with an ad agency down in Austin, Texas, called EnviroMedia Social Marketing. The result is the nifty Greenwashing Index, which entreats users to rate eco-claims made in popular ads. Greenwashing is what that shampoo company does when it proudly claims that no bunnies were hurt to make the stuff, but — oops! — neglects to mention that a whole bunch of bad pollutants were released into the air when the plastic container was made.
Interesting, isn't it, that forward-thinking movements breed both parasitic and obeisant industries so swiftly? The green-product movement inspired greenwashing, which in turn spawned the consumer-protection enviro-judges, like this one Van Fleet describes:
In November, TerraChoice Environmental Marketing Inc., a firm with offices in Pennsylvania and Ontario, Canada, released the results of its survey of more than 1,000 products found in big-box stores. The survey evaluated claims from bathroom cleaners labeled as “100 percent natural” to paper towels that claim “post-consumer recycled content” against six survey categories, including lack of proof or hidden trade-offs. According to the study, almost all of the environmental marketing claims were found to be misleading or false.
Hang on for the next round; perhaps it will be a website calculator that shows what one company (or ad agency) gains by challenging the green credentials of another.