Top of the News

Chosen and ranked by Crosscut editors. Click date for previous days.

Mouse over headline for description.

more top of the news

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


The Crosscut Blog »

Feb 18, 2008 1:56 AM | last updated Feb 18, 2008 2:00 AM
Ulysses S. Grant.

President Ulysses S. Grant.

Advertisement
Advertisement

It's Presidents Day in Washington: So whom can we claim as ours?

By Pete Jackson

Presidents Day evokes a chafe-inducing question: The Northwest has produced a president or two, yes?

The reflexive answer — that we’re too authentic to churn out presidents and, by the way, California ex-pats hail from Nixon country — is too 20th century. It’s time we adopt a president as One of Ours, someone who actually lived and labored in the Northwest.

Thankfully, at least one chief executive meets the worked-here criterion, a depressive Army captain stationed for 15 months at Fort Vancouver on the Columbia River. He was a whiskered, underappreciated alcoholic, a failed businessman, a Mexican War hero who condemned the imperialism of that conflict, an advocate of our nation’s first national park, and a vigorous supporter of civil rights for African Americans.

I speak, of course, of the Northwest’s very own Ulysses S. Grant.

Shush now. Grant had an extraordinary public career. He was committed to serving his country, however mediocre his West Point class rank. Like so many Westerners, Grant dabbled and failed miserably in the private sector. In a 2003 HistoryLink essay, Kit Oldham writes:

Like many soldiers of his day, Grant attempted to go into business for himself on the side. However, in a pattern that would be repeated throughout his life, the business ventures he entered with fellow officers proved to be failures despite his high expectations for them. The officers cut ice on the Columbia and shipped it to San Francisco for sale, but it melted before arrival. They rounded up cattle and pigs to ship to San Francisco, but lost money on the enterprise. They leased land and started a farm, but a river flood wiped out most of the crops. They rented space in a San Francisco hotel to run a billiard club, but the manager they hired absconded with their money.

Grant’s subsequent redemption dovetails with a broader Northwest narrative: Through bust and boom and post-presidential bust, character matters. Grant was a depressive who fought the KKK, saved the Union at the Battle of Vicksburg, and, to ensure that his family avoided the poor house, scribbled the best-written presidential memoir in American history, despite suffering the ravages of throat cancer.

Who better to call one of ours?

Comments
Grant was a man of action
Report a violationPosted by: Grizzzfan on Feb 18, 2008 12:13 PM
Nice idea but misses the essential nature of Grant and why there is a total disconnect to the Northwest. Grant, for all of his failures, kept trying. He was a man of action. After the Donelson campaign when Grant was relieved by Halleck allegedly for drinking, Lincoln said "I can't spare this man, he fights." Lincoln is also allegedly to have said that if Grant was a drinker to send the other generals the same whisky. Grant determined his objectives, evaluated how to accomplish them, then tried his hardest to complete his task. He may have failed frequently, but he also became President and General of the Armies. Contrast that the leaders of Washingotn and Oregon -- no firm positions, constant planning, deferral to committees of citizens or experts, cannot make decisions, second guess everyone.........How long have we known 520 and the Viaduct need replacing? 30 years? The 1920 vintage state ferries were first determined to be too old in the 1960s......now 40 years later they are finally removed from service. No Washington "leader" Gregoire, Locke, Sims, etc will lead. Scoop Jackson was the last "leader" from the Northwest. Grant would listen to Gregoire, Sims and the rest babble, and then get it done. It was how he won the war and became President. I like the idea of adopting a President, and Grant is worthy of emulation, but he doesn't quite fit the bill.
RE: Grant was a man of action
Report a violationPosted by: dbreneman on Feb 19, 2008 12:03 PM
A perfect President for Washington to adopt would be Jimmy Carter! Think of it: so obsessed with details he ties himself up in knots. Preachy and pious. Willing to eliminate people's rights on a whim (remember the plan to ban convertibles because they weren't "rollover-worthy"?). Taking strong stands like "If those Iranians don't release our hostages, why, I'll... uh... ...eat my hat." Can't you just see him sitting in that Mister Rogers sweater telling the country how the American people had let him down? He'd be perfect. The 70s were a bleak and dismal time, and ol' Jimmuh was the poster boy of that era; and the outlook for this state is getting bleaker and more dismal every day the Legislature stays in session.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign up for Crosscut's free weekday newsletter e-mail.
About Crosscut
Advertising Info
Crosscut's list of RSS feeds.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Crosscut »
Crosscut Seattle is an online newspaper for the Pacific Northwest, including Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and British Columbia. It's a guide to local and regional news, a place to report and discuss news, and a platform for new tools to convey news.

• More about Crosscut

Contact Crosscut

Tools

Sign up for Crosscut's daily newsletter
About Crosscut
Advertising Info
Crosscut's list of RSS feeds.

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement