Saving our communal storm sewer, Puget Sound
Annals of Nathan Myhrvold and the many fathers of invention, by Malcolm Gladwell
Seattle Mariners »An international search for a Gates Foundation CEO ends on the Microsoft campus
Science / Environment »In just decades, a Lake Washington fish evolved to survive without pollution
Food »Ah, about that Copper River salmon: not such a good 'carbon footprint'
Port of Seattle »As a reformist port commission gets sea legs, there is push-back from the staff
Politics / Government »A review of public disclosure exemptions rouses the constituencies behind them
Seattle goes gah-gah over choo-choos
The city's own series of tubes
Fast times and loads of fun, despite expensive gas
The Northwest's real fairy tales
Spin the bottle: The climate-action mayor misses the point on drinking water
A city of scolds
(23 comments)
Seattle goes gah-gah over choo-choos
(9 comments)
Responding to her readers on paid family leave
(6 comments)
Why Hillary Clinton should stay in the race
(6 comments)
The city's own series of tubes
(5 comments)
Puget Sound on Prozac
(4 comments)
Fast times and loads of fun, despite expensive gas
(3 comments)
Hillary Clinton, will you please go now!
(3 comments)
Memo to the owners of the Mariners
(3 comments)
Strange figure sighted at the City Council
(3 comments)
Steve Scher of KUOW-FM and I recently walked from Seattle's University District to Hooter's and jumped the SLUT. It was a nice little ride, my first. Now that the hoopla's died down, it was a chance to get a sense of how Seattle's streetcar of dreams is doing trundling along the streets of Allentown.
Some impressions. The first is that the area at the end of the line on Fairview Avenue North feels like parts of Bellevue: all density and no people. Fairview is not exactly pedestrian friendly; much of the South Lake Union neighborhood still has that yet-to-be-inhabited boomtown feel. The fact that the end of the line is right outside Hooters just adds to the impression. Plus, the area is still designed to accommodate cars. All those restaurants along the shore are separated from the street by huge parking lots. This isn't a place scaled for pedestrians.
On the SLUT, my first reaction: Where is everybody? Aimee Curl of Seattle Weekly reports that ridership is under 1,000 boardings per day. It's clear why. The SLUT doesn't go anywhere. Well, that's not quite right. It seems like a way to shuttle office workers to and from lunch or dentist appointments. On the lunch hour trip we took, however, there were only about six passengers — most having a hard time figuring out how to get the fare machine to take dollar bills.
It seems clear that the SLUT's biggest appeal, in the short term, will be tourists — an easy way to get from the Cheesecake Factory end of town to Hooterville.
The streetcar interior is comfortable, spacious, the ride pleasant. It is also a reminder of why this type of travel is agreeable, if you're not in a hurry (which tourists and office workers returning from lunch usually aren't). On Metro buses, you ride way above street level, and looking out the window you see mostly signs, awnings, etc. On the SLUT, the generous visibility through multiple windows is like looking at the frames of a film about urban streets. In fact, because of what is cropped out of the picture (mostly unremarkable buildings), the impression you get of Westlake Avenue from inside the streetcar is of a very urban place — liveliness, people, doorways, city clutter. In other words, the SLUT is a built-in sales tool for the developers who are trying to transform South Lake Union. It's as if you're traveling through Vulcan's scale model of the district.
We know, of course, that being a sales tool is the SLUT's primary purpose. The history of railroads is not so much to get people from point A to point B as to make money on the adjacent real estate. At one time, the cities of Puget Sound fell all over themselves to get rail lines. Some historians of urban planning suggest that Seattle was lucky not to become the terminus of the Northern Pacific because it never became hostage, as Tacoma did, to a single band of railroad robber barons. Ronald Boyce, professor emeritus of urban planning at Seattle Pacific University, has called it a "godsend." Seattle tried to sell its soul, but there were no takers.
So it will be interesting to see how the SLUT experiment plays out. Will it make the robber barons of South Lake Union happy? Will the farebox do well enough to keep it on track? Will the operators raise enough advertising and sponsorship money to avoid becoming a financial black hole? How will the Monorail do now that's its got street-level competition for tourist dollars? Will the SLUT change the way we see South Lake Union and downtown?
Part of the argument you hear already is that the SLUT only makes sense if we extend the system. You'll hear that argument if it fails financially (we must extend it to make it viable) and if it succeeds (it's a great model that should be adopted everywhere). It's the classic policy gambit: No outcome justifies retreat! Just like Iraq.
David, I have to chuckle because I thought my review of the SLUT was pretty positive. I like the scale and the speed with which it got up and running. Will it prove out? Remains to be seen, but I think it really demonstrates the virtues, at least if you don't consider the ultimate operating costs and how much that eats into more practical and less-colorful bus service. I'm eager to how see it works financially and with riders. That'll be a big part of its final grade. I do wish the development at South Lake Union matched the streetcar's scale. I find most of it too big, too sterile, too yuppie, too corporate. But that's not the streetcar's fault.
Well Knute, I thought the S.L.U.T kind of sucked, until you pointed out the Hooters - to - Cheesecake Factory aspect. This may have improved my opinion of it actually.
What I want to know is whether the SLUT is hot? Who in his right mind would want to hang with a SLUT that isn't?
While you may use the SLUT, will you respect it in the morning???
One thing I didn't mention: On our SLUT ride, there was a father and son sitting next to me (boy older than three, but still small) and the lad was looking out the window and peppering his dad with questions. He was full of wonder at the streetcar ride, and it reminded me of the thrill I felt when I first rode the monorail in 1962-or maybe the mini-train around Woodland Park. That kid was really enthralled.
Report a violationPosted by: David Sucher on Jan 18, 2008 7:34 AM