Pre-deluge, state geologists and Weyerhaeuser paid little attention to landslide dangers
Sound Transit » Media »While daily newspapers dump staff, David Black quietly builds an empire
Immigration »Immigrants are being mistreated at Northwest Detention Center, says a new report
Business / Technology »Jon Talton: (Insured) depositors should stay the WaMu course, which will be rocky
History »Danny Westneat: D.B. Cooper might have been a woman
Architecture / Design »Portland, Vancouver, Wash., clash over the bridge that would connect them
Amazon »Amazon launches an online streaming video store
Travel »The case for more rail transit
Last stand for the Alaskan Way Viaduct
Little boxes, crammed together
At the top floors, the high and mighty are in denial
The case for more rail transit
(121 comments)
Sound Transit showdown
(22 comments)
Last stand for the Alaskan Way Viaduct
(18 comments)
At the top floors, the high and mighty are in denial
(16 comments)
Little boxes, crammed together
(10 comments)
Our cultural amnesia
(9 comments)
More fun than Deliverance!
(7 comments)
Campaign strategy session
(5 comments)
The governor releases her IRS return; Dino Rossi still won't
(5 comments)
Bus envy
(5 comments)
Abby Martin, the University of Washington graduate student who is trying to save the fascinating old Nuclear Reactor Building (now More Hall Annex) on campus, sends us this photo showing a new addition: a sign announcing the university's intention to demolish the structure. Martin has submitted an application nominating it for a National Historic Register listing. The modern architecture group Docomomo WeWa has added it to their list of endangered historic properties.
Martin is urging people to ask Seattle's Department of Planning and Development to delay demolition, slated for this summer. She is also urging the public to write to university president Mark Emmert asking the UW to consider preserving the historic structure instead of tearing it down. While the university has long discussed the fate of the building, no formal review of its historic significance was undertaken because it is less than 50 years old and city landmark regulations do not apply to UW property. The National Register, however, will consider listing younger structures in exceptional cases.
The building, which housed a small working nuclear reactor between 1964 and 1988, was the remarkable product of a collaboration between three of Seattle's most noted modern architects, Wendell Lovett, Gene Zema, and Daniel Streissguth. It was designed to train future nuclear engineers and open the arcane alchemy of nuclear science to public view. The Nuclear Reactor Building, Martin has written, was "intended to dispel the mystery of nuclear power and to showcase the progressive technology." It was conceived and constructed during the during the boom in science and technology instruction inspired by the launch of Sputnik and John F. Kennedy's New Frontier.
A side note: The UW building is not the only endangered reactor building in the state. The Washington Trust for Historic Preservation also lists B Reactor at Hanford on its "Watch list" of historic structures at risk. The B reactor, built for the Manhattan Project, was the first full-scale plutonium reactor ever built. According to a group that hopes to turn the reactor building into museum, the B Reactor Museum Association, the Department of Energy has agreed not to demolish it until studies of its historic significance are complete. It is currently being considered for possible listing as a National Historic Landmark. Let's hope it gets a "glowing" report.
Knute Berger is Mossback, Crosscut's chief Northwest native. He also writes the monthly Gray Matters column for Seattle magazine and is a weekly Friday guest on Weekday on KUOW-FM (94.9). You can e-mail him at mossback@crosscut.com.