Danny Westneat: In Eastern Washington, the Great Depression is not forgotten
2008 Election »How Sound Transit critics transformed an $18 billion system into $107 billion
Transportation »A survey shows 73 percent support a light rail system — in Spokane
U.S. Congress »About that Oregon arrow-manufacturer's tax break: It's not what it seems
Energy / Utilities »Judging from the flow of venture capital, the next big green thing might be algae
Higher Ed »For students who get private loans, the credit crisis hits hard
Three advocates make the case for Sound Transit expansion
Sarah Palin's socialist 'sandwich'
For Gregoire, all the highway news is bad news
American graffiti: The problem with third-party candidates
How accurate is Battle in Seattle?
Move the meter: 'Buildergate' gains media legs
Three advocates make the case for Sound Transit expansion
(37 comments)
Amid a swirl of national affairs, two rock-steady debaters
(14 comments)
The prospect of a POTUS with PTSD
(14 comments)
American graffiti: The problem with third-party candidates
(11 comments)
Dear Sen. Murray: Please don't feed the rats
(8 comments)
Belt-tightening time for the Mercer Mess?
(7 comments)
A city of memory
(6 comments)
The bailout rejection sets the stage for a tough week
(6 comments)
Sarah Palin's socialist 'sandwich'
(5 comments)
Move the meter: 'Buildergate' gains media legs
(5 comments)
What makes it noteworthy is the fact the school district's policies regarding race have been in the news lately. Officially, the district presumes racism is institutionalized in Seattle schools and that students of color are inherently disadvantaged.
A particularly strident articulation of this notion was once posted on the school district's Web site. It said, in effect, that in America only whites are racist and that examples of white cultural racism included individualism and expectations that students learn standard English. When it came to light last year, the statements were removed.
A brief description of the White Privilege Conference to be held in Colorado Springs, Colo., this month can be found at the school district's Web site in the "Equity and Race Relations" section. The trip will be paid for by a "small learning communities grant."
Examination of "white privilege" is part of a re-orientation in the field of diversity to shift the focus from "racism" to the broader socioeconomic context of American Society.
According to the White Privilege Conference Web site, the goal of the gathering is to make people more aware of the "negative historical implications of 'Whiteness,'" to "difuse [sic] the destructive power" of whiteness, and to encourage students to become "champions" of social justice and change. The conference organizers further describe it this way:
The annual White Privilege Conference (WPC) serves as a yearly opportunity to examine and explore difficult issues related to white privilege, white supremacy and oppression. WPC provides a forum for critical discussions about diversity, multicultural education and leadership, social justice, race/racism, sexual orientation, gender relations, religion and other systems of privilege/oppression. WPC is recognized as a challenging, empowering and educational experience. The workshops, keynotes and institutes not only inform participants, but engage and challenge them, while providing practical tips and strategies for combating inequality."
According to the conference Web site, the goal of the gathering is, in part, to make white people aware that they have been purposely kept ignorant of their societal advantages and to make participants more aware of the "negative historical implications of 'Whiteness.'" In the conference's FAQ, we learn:
Q: What is privilege?A: "I have come to see white privilege as an invisible package of unearned assets which I can count on cashing in each day, but about which I was meant to remain oblivious. White Privilege is like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools, and blank checks." —Peggy McIntosh, White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack
Q: What does it do?
A: "It seems to me that obliviousness about white advantage is kept strongly inculturated in the United States so as to maintain the myth of meritocracy, the myth that democratic choice is equally available to all. Keeping most people unaware that freedom of confident action is there for just a small number of people props up those in power, and serves to keep power in the hands of the same groups that have most of it already. —Peggy McIntosh, White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack
Q: Is this about proving how bad white folks are?
A: "Our attempts to dismantle dominance and oppression must follow a path other than that of either vilifying or obliterating Whiteness ... Whites need to acknowledge and work through the negative historical implications of "Whiteness" and create for ourselves a transformed identity as White people committed to equality and social change. Our goal is neither to defy or denigrate Whiteness, but to difuse [sic] its destructive power.
"To teach my white students and my own children that they are 'not White' is to do them a disservice. To teach them that there a [sic] different ways of being White, and that they have a choice as White people to become champions fo [sic] justice and social healing, is to provide them a positive direction for growth and to grant them the dignity of their own being. —Gary Howard, We Can't Teach What We Don't Know: White Teachers, Multiracial Schools
The founder of the conference is Eddie Moore Jr., now director of diversity at the elite private Seattle academy The Bush School.
It is especially interesting in light of the discussion inspired by a Seattle Times story about white parents feeling unwanted at the Madrona K-8 school. Read about the experience there of Seattle Times columnist Danny Westneat and my take on the controversy.
Westneat followed up on Sunday, April 8, with a new column about the response to his anguish over his family's experience at Madrona, where white "charity" was deemed as being racist. In response to Danny's column, Chris Drape, principal of The New School in southeast Seattle, said his piece was an example of "unexamined white privilege."
Westneat will be taking questions on the topic of race, live on the Times Web site from noon to 1 p.m. on Monday, April 9.
Is this trip necessary???
Oh, some of these comments are painful to read. I don't agree that "white" is a color; I think it's a racialized identity that was invented just to convey an artificial kind of specialness, with special rights and privileges. My ancestors came from Wessex, Wales, Ireland, France and Germany, but none of them was "white" by nature; "white" is something they became when the category of "whiteness" was created by designating other people as "lower races." Even so, the Irish, Jews and Italians had to wait longer to become "white" in this country than some others did.
The essence of freedom and liberty is the right of an individual to think, speak, and act as he or she sees fit in light of what's seen as the individual's best interests. Somewhere along the way, we've lost sight of not only this notion, but also some necessary corollaries.
Part II...
Snesich writes, "I guess Piper has done an in depth study of every single school and teacher in the Seattle School District. Congratuations."
I agree that we're all sinners and we're all responsible for ourselves, though figuring out how to take responsibility for oneself can take a lifetime, and how many of us even thought about this kind of thing when we were adolescents? Kids test limits and flout authority, and when they do so they can be very unpleasant and sometimes scary for adults to deal with. I don't envy "Disgruntled"'s experiences, and of course it's not "racist" to object to rude and threatening behavior. To say that "white" people can be racist but African-American people can't sort of makes sense to me (because I think the terms aren't symmetrical, they have different histories etc.), but it's an abstract kind of sense, and it doesn't seem like a useful principal for conducting any kind of relationship. It seems a bit like saying that because U.S. women couldn't vote until 1920, it's always my husband's turn to do the dishes!
I'd be real interested in knowing how hard CROSSCUT tried to offer a breadth of voices on their staff. Is everyone white? Mostly male? Mostly 50? Talking about civic engagement is another way NOT to change the power structure. What I see in Seattle is that the janitor is hispanic, the parking attendant is African American but the folks in power are white and make themselves feel better by having their civic engagement love fest or their diversity shindigs. The Madrona school article was more of the same. Most of the comments on ths blog belong on the FOX webpage. Is Crosscut Fox-Lite?
Crosscut is fully aware that it is comprised mostly of middle-aged white guys sitting around talking, and we plan to address that shortcoming.
Yarrow said:
Racism is a belief, and only individual human beings can believe. Institutions of themselves are incapable of opinion or belief, hence my absolute discomfort with the term "compassionate government." Only people can be compassionate, and only people can be racist.
Report a violationPosted by: animalal on Apr 9, 2007 12:47 AM