Pre-deluge, state geologists and Weyerhaeuser paid little attention to landslide dangers
Sound Transit » Media »While daily newspapers dump staff, David Black quietly builds an empire
Immigration »Immigrants are being mistreated at Northwest Detention Center, says a new report
Business / Technology »Jon Talton: (Insured) depositors should stay the WaMu course, which will be rocky
History »Danny Westneat: D.B. Cooper might have been a woman
Architecture / Design »Portland, Vancouver, Wash., clash over the bridge that would connect them
Amazon »Amazon launches an online streaming video store
Travel »The case for more rail transit
Last stand for the Alaskan Way Viaduct
Little boxes, crammed together
At the top floors, the high and mighty are in denial
The case for more rail transit
(121 comments)
Sound Transit showdown
(22 comments)
Last stand for the Alaskan Way Viaduct
(18 comments)
At the top floors, the high and mighty are in denial
(16 comments)
Little boxes, crammed together
(10 comments)
Our cultural amnesia
(9 comments)
More fun than Deliverance!
(7 comments)
Campaign strategy session
(5 comments)
The governor releases her IRS return; Dino Rossi still won't
(5 comments)
Bus envy
(5 comments)
The problem with that theory in Seattle is scale and demand: Condos are popular, but so too are the increasingly scarce (and expensive) single-family homes. Neighborhoods are seeing backyards and vacant lots disappear; homebuilders are increasing densities inefficiently by building huge homes with few people per square foot; townhomes, skinny houses, bungvillas, and megahouse remodels are also cramping Seattle's residential style.
The market is rewarding developers who build large, single-family houses on tiny lots because the demand for single family homes in the city is still strong.
So while massive downtown development is supposedly good for the neighbs, it doesn't mean in-fill isn't having major impacts citywide.
There have always been development squabbles over views and scale, but the pressures are very likely to increase as Seattle's population swells and as the economics of class division get worse.
A case in point. A reader sends in a link to this controversy in West Seattle: A nasty sign is hung on an under-construction million-dollar dream house. It says, "Developer terrorist: testament to his greed." The reader who wrote me wonders if "Seattle polite isn't fraying at the edges." The signs says the home — a tall, apparently charmless box — is an example of "developer terrorism." The very upset owner of the house in question then weighs in with his side of the story. (Read comments from "Michael.")
Is this merely an isolated dispute over a view, or more indicative of tempers at the grassroots level?
In any case, it's always good fodder for discussion when the city's smiley-face mask slips.
It's a word I coined at Seattle Weekly in 2006 to describe the currently popular practice of taking small classic bangalows and remodeling them by adding two or three stories to make tall mini-towers stretching up for a lake view. Common in Madison Park, for example. An alternate would be "bungzilla."
Report a violationPosted by: Stephanie on Aug 1, 2007 10:36 AM