Saving our communal storm sewer, Puget Sound
Annals of Nathan Myhrvold and the many fathers of invention, by Malcolm Gladwell
Seattle Mariners »An international search for a Gates Foundation CEO ends on the Microsoft campus
Science / Environment »In just decades, a Lake Washington fish evolved to survive without pollution
Food »Ah, about that Copper River salmon: not such a good 'carbon footprint'
Port of Seattle »As a reformist port commission gets sea legs, there is push-back from the staff
Politics / Government »A review of public disclosure exemptions rouses the constituencies behind them
Seattle goes gah-gah over choo-choos
The city's own series of tubes
Fast times and loads of fun, despite expensive gas
The Northwest's real fairy tales
Spin the bottle: The climate-action mayor misses the point on drinking water
A city of scolds
(23 comments)
Seattle goes gah-gah over choo-choos
(9 comments)
Responding to her readers on paid family leave
(6 comments)
Why Hillary Clinton should stay in the race
(6 comments)
The city's own series of tubes
(5 comments)
Puget Sound on Prozac
(4 comments)
Fast times and loads of fun, despite expensive gas
(3 comments)
Hillary Clinton, will you please go now!
(3 comments)
Memo to the owners of the Mariners
(3 comments)
Strange figure sighted at the City Council
(3 comments)
Red alert to Dick's Drive-In. They're coming for you next.
The Seattle Times reports that the Fun Forest, which isn't a forest or the right sort of fun, seemingly, is headed to a likely closure, doomed by pressures to erase the tacky from our Seattle Center.
The center used to be a place for everybody. That included the mugwumps who like their hydros loud, the Blue Angels louder, and their Dick's Deluxe with fries.
The Times says the Fun Forest shows declining revenue and it's all very sad, but the city just can't subsidize a marginal business, unless, ahem, its employees are seven feet tall and skillful with a basketball.
OK, the operator owes the city $763,890 in back rent, and business is business, when it's only about that. But it isn't. Nearly every other piece of Seattle Center has a constituency, and nobody gets a no in city politics. The skateboarders get attention and, you bet, a replacement for their lost park. The opera people get their hall and needed subsidies. The Irish get their freckle contest, along with the city's other ethnic groups. Even Channel 9, which has nothing to do with recreation, got a piece on that contested ground. And that's how it should be, our center, our gathering place. Come one, come all.
But I like roller coasters and kiddie rides. It's been a while, but I loved it, especially with kids in tow.
Months ago, when news first broke that the Fun Forest was threatened, I called their operator's offices and they wouldn't talk. That's typical. They had no idea how to play the game, much less make the case that they served a community that deserved a spot, at least somewhere.
So out they go by the end of 2009, that silly collection of metal and grease, squealing kids and other unauthorized noise, yet another discarded remnant of blue collar Seattle.
Is there a roller coaster left in this town?
because they love the Fun Forest, at least the part that caters to the younger set. I have many fond memories riding the boat swing, mini-roller coaster, ferris wheel, dragon and elephant ride, and tornado with my kids clinging to me and screaming with a mix of delight and terror. Or waving to me with a goofy smile from those little cars each time they rounded the loop.
Sean makes an excellent point here. I've watch the Fun Forest for decades, and I never noticed a promotion (they could have used help from the coffee shop guy who launched the SLUT tee-shirts). And true, the pricing structured had problems. The Times reported that the operators invested $9 million in improvements in 1996--that shocked me. So why not do some marketing?
Report a violationPosted by: Sean on Nov 21, 2007 9:38 PM