Pre-deluge, state geologists and Weyerhaeuser paid little attention to landslide dangers
Sound Transit » Media »While daily newspapers dump staff, David Black quietly builds an empire
Immigration »Immigrants are being mistreated at Northwest Detention Center, says a new report
Business / Technology »Jon Talton: (Insured) depositors should stay the WaMu course, which will be rocky
History »Danny Westneat: D.B. Cooper might have been a woman
Architecture / Design »Portland, Vancouver, Wash., clash over the bridge that would connect them
Amazon »Amazon launches an online streaming video store
Travel »The case for more rail transit
Last stand for the Alaskan Way Viaduct
Little boxes, crammed together
At the top floors, the high and mighty are in denial
The case for more rail transit
(121 comments)
Sound Transit showdown
(22 comments)
Last stand for the Alaskan Way Viaduct
(18 comments)
At the top floors, the high and mighty are in denial
(16 comments)
Little boxes, crammed together
(10 comments)
Our cultural amnesia
(9 comments)
More fun than Deliverance!
(7 comments)
Campaign strategy session
(5 comments)
The governor releases her IRS return; Dino Rossi still won't
(5 comments)
Bus envy
(5 comments)
Update:A related survey in Puget Sound Business Journal looks at housing affordability in 50 top cities. In this one, Seattle comes in 11th worst, with Portland a close contender at 14th.
The cities are ranked in the Forbes.com survey of business attractiveness according to three factors: cost of doing business, job growth, and educational levels. Seattle, as you might expect, does very well in education, ranking 15th of the 200 cities surveyed, and poorly (158th) in cost of business. Tacoma, finishing a respectable 43rd on the list, is the reverse of Seattle: 152nd in education levels and 84th in cost of business. In Boise, the numbers are 17 for cost of business, 13 in job growth, and 87 in education. Portland's three numbers, respectively, are 134, 55, 52, with a little surprise in the education figure.
Regional cities are ranked by the Forbes survey as follows: Boise (2), Olympia (8), Spokane (9), Seattle (20), Denver (31), Portland (35), Euguene (36), Tacoma, (43), Salem (60), Boulder (77), Anchorage (146), and San Francisco (197).
That shocking San Francisco figure, demonstrating how soaring costs of business are really starting to penalized the "hot" cities, is a warning for Seattle, despite its currently high rating in the Forbes index. Boston (160th) and Cambridge, Mass (155th) are also signals in this regard.
Another intriguing aspect of the survey is that only Atlanta and Seattle, of all the country's major cities, make it into the top 20. The best places for business are decidedly small, as is clear from the list of the top ten: Raleigh, N.C., Boise, Fort Collins, Colo, Des Moines, Lexington, KY, Atlanta, Richmond, VA, Olympia, Spokane, and Knoxville, Tenn.
As for the housing affordability index by the Business Journals network, the shocking figures are how high some cities are in terms of median housing payments as a percentage of income. LA is the worst, at 75.46 percent, followed by San Francisco at 69.8 percent. Seattle's is 41.9 and Portland is 37.8. Here's the list of the 15 least affordable cities for housing, with the worst ones listed highest: Los Angeles, San Francisco-Oakland, San Diego, San Jose, New York City, Sacramento, Riverside-San Bernadino, Miami-Fort Lauderdale, Boston, Providence, Seattle, Las Vegas, Washington D.C., Portland, Oregon, and Orlando.
Report a violationPosted by: dltooley on Mar 21, 2008 10:21 AM