John McCain's stunning veep pick is Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin
In a speech about America's 'promise,' Barack Obama comes out swinging
With a $1 million donation, GOP governors give Dino Rossi financial parity in a close race
Boeing »Boeing Machinists appear likely to vote against the company's final offer
Transportation »Critical Mass bicyclists return to Seattle's streets today
UW Huskies »Sports blogger: Willingham is what college football claims to care about but doesn't
Crosscut's 2008 election predictions, UPDATED
Death by a thousand (paper) cuts
The mayor's block party weekend
Lake Union Park: a first assessment
The mayor's block party weekend
(20 comments)
Is Sound Transit really one of 'the world's biggest boondoggles'?
(14 comments)
Crosscut's 2008 election predictions, UPDATED
(13 comments)
Extreme Seattle
(9 comments)
Death by a thousand (paper) cuts
(8 comments)
The post-partisan electorate
(8 comments)
Lake Union Park: a first assessment
(8 comments)
Why Palin, why now
(7 comments)
Election reflections
(6 comments)
The funny thing about Seattle ...
(6 comments)
I recently watched TVW's video explaining how the controversial "top-two" primary will work. It features interviews with Seattle Times chief political reporter David Postman and David Ammons, the communications director for the office of Secretary of State.
As Postman notes, it's "highly probable" that in certain districts, such as the 36th Legislative District in Seattle, two Democrats will win the primary and be placed on the November ballot, just as it's likely some Eastern Washington districts may have two Republicans face off in the general election — sans Democrats. That's nothing new. But it does raise an interesting question, one that's been circling the Crosscut office: How will lifelong Democrats vote in districts where the top-two primary winners are both Republicans? What will lifelong Republicans do if the general election ballot is all Blue?
I posed the question to Washington State Democratic Party Chairman Dwight Pelz. Here's how he responded:
We would not recommend any Republican over another. We excel at telling you to vote Democratic.
Right. But what about people who want to vote for someone? Should they not vote at all? Washington State Republican Party Chairman Luke Esser seemed to have more reasonable advice:
If someone called me up and asked me how to vote, I would tell them to vote for the less objectionable Democrat — if there's a meaningful difference in his or her positions and ideology. If not, feel free to not vote for either of those two scoundrels. That's what I would do, personally.
I'll put it to you. If your district primary yields two candidates from the same side of the aisle — but opposite your own — what will you do on November 4?
As a nearly lifelong resident of the 43rd district, I've never really had much of a choice, but if I lived in, say, #7? I'd do what I always do — vote for the lesser of the two evils. Though I tend to vote D, I'm not averse to occasionally voting R, and if Rs were my only choice, so be it. The only races in which I routinely cast no vote are ones in which only one candidate is running. In those cases, I'll only vote if I affirmatively like the candidate.
We're still focused too much on parties and a candidate's party affiliation. The glory of the new top-two primary is that the electorate is forced to look at a person's political platform, not a collective's platform.
It's worth noting that Pierce County will begin limited ranked-choice voting this fall, with expansions in 2010.
Report a violationPosted by: Benjamin Lukoff on Jul 29, 2008 10:57 AM