Daylight Savings Time creep has an unnatural feeling to it

During the modern era, it may have seemed reasonable to believe we could just think our way to a different, better time of day. But aren't we all post-moderns now?

Businesses tend to like Daylight Savings Time: A 2008 promotion in Chicago.

smussyolay/Flickr (CC)

Businesses tend to like Daylight Savings Time: A 2008 promotion in Chicago.

A sunset at the beach

Flickr

A sunset at the beach

Originally it was called “summer time.” But it’s hard to make that stick now that Daylight Savings Time starts while winter is still officially with us.

When the Congressional Uniform Time Act of 1966 created more of a national system for Daylight Savings Time usage, the start date was in June. In 1986 that act was amended to move the beginning of summer to April. Then in 2007 it was cranked forward once again, to its present second weekend in March (Sunday, March 11, this year). End dates have also been pushed from September to October, now to November.

I like summer. I like Daylight Savings Time. I like the long days and the extended evenings of summer in the Northwest. But I am less sure about beginning the whole thing when winter still has nearly two weeks to go and we are just now beginning to see a lightening of the sky in the early mornings. Besides for the world’s morning people, of which I am one, the sudden thrust back into darkness is a bummer. Morning people unite, this is our time!

For Christians the current spiritual season is Lent, which comes from an Old English word for spring and for the lengthening of days in the Northern Hemisphere. I love this steady but gradual lengthening during Lent. It seems so symbolically right. Daily, the sun rises a minute or two earlier. Nightly, it sets a minute or two later. The days steadily lengthen in ways that you almost don’t notice, and yet you do.

But this sudden lurch forward to longer evening light (and the plunge back into morning darkness) that attends Daylight Savings Time coming in March? The subtle and the natural are eclipsed by something that feels arbitrary, mechanical, and heavy-handed. “Forget the rhythms and cycles of nature: now’s the time, like it or not!”

The gradual lengthening of the days here in late winter and early spring is full of promise, hinting at nature’s shifts in a way that builds anticipation and delight. Spring’s full glory is coming, but not yet ... Earth’s resurrection is felt in our bones, but gradually, as if we ourselves were stretching and opening, budding out.

Bringing on Daylight Savings Time in early March, on the other hand, seems as if a delivery truck has just dumped a huge crate in the front yard. Clunk. Bang. “Where do you want it, lady?” It’s another incursion of instant this and overnight that. Instant coffee, fast-food, quick loans, and sudden summer.

Besides, it was George W. Bush who signed the latest changes into law. Nobody likes him, not even Republicans who have developed a most curious case of near total amnesia with respect to their last occupant of the White House. George who?

The idea of Daylight Savings Time is traced to Benjamin Franklin, which seems surprising in that the Ben of Poor Richard’s Almanac famously counseled, “Early to bed, early to rise makes a man healthy, wealthy and wise.” But while on ambassadorial duty in France, Franklin noted the French penchant for burning the midnight oil and produced a satirical essay suggesting how the French might economize on candles.

Nothing happened on Daylight Savings Time until the First World War, when Germany first adopted it. It lapsed after the war but was reintroduced, this time in America, during the Second World War. Over the years, implementation has been variable, with some states, like Arizona, that aren’t much interested in more summer sun, opting out. And in Indiana each separate county traditionally voted on whether to participate or not. The state, already sliced between Central and Eastern time zones, was a crazy patchwork quilt of time zones until 2006.

The main rationale for DST is energy savings, but the data to prove it actually accomplishes this goal is not conclusive and may be balanced out by arguments, and some evidence, of a negative effect on people’s sleep cycles and body rhythms. There’s a good chance that melatonin sales and usage will spike this weekend.

Daylight Savings Time benefits retailiers and sports enthusiasts. It is less good for the entertainment industry and agriculture. And have you considered its effects on vampires? Washington Post blogger Alexandra Petri, no fan of DST, avers, “My only reason for supporting Daylight Savings Time is that it makes keeping a work-life balance more difficult for vampires.”

Daylight Savings Time seems a creature of modernity, that now-fading epoch when rationality, efficency, and the odd presumption that human beings could and should subject nature to their control was the name of the game. For moderns, nature is the Newtonian machine, one which we rational tinkerers and engineers may adjust to our liking, preferences, and convenience.

But in our post-modern age we are less sure about rationality über alles and more attentive to things like the body and its wisdom. The modernist machine has been replaced by the organic and systemic thinking of post-modernity. It’s less a matter of humans in charge and more a matter of humanity fitting in, going with the flow of mother nature and her wisdom.

It would be silly to advocate abolishing DST — and I’m not. But I am noting DST “creep” and its increasingly early and sudden arrival. And I am wondering if easing into DST when it’s at least actually spring, if not nearly summer, might make more sense?


About the Author

Anthony B. (Tony) Robinson is President of Seattle-based Congregational Leadership Northwest. He speaks and writes, nationally and internationally, on religious life and leadership. He is the author of 10 books. Crosscut readers may particularly enjoy Common Grace (Sasquatch Books). His blog, "What's Tony Thinking?", is at his website, www.anthonybrobinson.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Thu, Mar 8, 7:55 a.m. Inappropriate

Perhaps the DST creep will continue until it is year around. But, beware, it may soon come later than we think.

Posted Thu, Mar 8, 9:06 a.m. Inappropriate

When congress pushed out DST in 2007 it created the biggest IT headache since Y2K. In addition to that, most counties that observe "summer time" do it on the schedule the US had before the 2007 change. So now we have a period of several weeks, twice a year, when airline schedules, amongst other international timetables, become almost impossible to decipher. The US needs to go back to the standard it created and put daylight time on its pre-2007 schedule.

dbreneman

Posted Thu, Mar 8, 10:40 a.m. Inappropriate

Why would it be "silly" to advocate abolishing DST? As pointed out, we don't have numbers on energy savings, which if I recall correctly was the rationale for making it end later & begin earlier, and what savings are likely, anyway? We need extra light either in the morning or in the evening. I think it would likely be a wash. And while I welcome that extra hour in the fall, I find it truly tortuous to make the change back in March, especially because I am a biological owl already struggling with living a lark's life. If the retailers and others hope for increased business with longer evenings, I can say with certainty I won't be one of the consumers. I'll be struggling to go to sleep while it's still light so I can get up half a day before I would if I could live by my own body clock.

Also, aside from the documented health issues the changes bring, I believe they also promote things like traffic accidents because folks are exhausted from trying to adjust.

Whatever rationale supported DST in the past has become obsolete and we should abolish it, preferably before we have to change back this weekend!

mspat

Posted Thu, Mar 8, 12:17 p.m. Inappropriate

Every year, the government robs us of an hour in the spring, and gives that hour back in the fall. As you pointed out, this state of theft persisted for six months until 2007, and George W. stole another two months. I hope he's enjoying those ill-gotten hours back in Texas.

The only fair way to remedy this situation would be for the stolen hours to be repaid with interest. If we lose an hour in March, we should be given 63 minutes back in November.

An interesting nugget caught on the news a few years ago, when wildfires were raging in California. The broadcaster said that the upside of the DST changeover is that the firefighters would have an extra hour with which to battle the fire. Come again?

Posted Thu, Mar 8, 1:09 p.m. Inappropriate

Daylight Savings Time is pointless and costly. Why can't businesses decide to let workers shift their hours, or let schools change their schedules so that kids can take advantage of natural light instead of walking in the dark? Why does it have to be a change mandated by law?

talisker

Posted Thu, Mar 8, 6:20 p.m. Inappropriate

Its a good idea that should run all year. Let the sun cross the meridian at 1 p.m. rather than 12. Heck, lets make it 2 p.m.

Posted Thu, Mar 8, 9:46 p.m. Inappropriate

I have 4 points to make about this piece. First, and foremost, the writer should read this article from a couple of years ago by Michael Kinsley in The Atlantic and take it to heart. I can't believe the amount of column inches used to make such a small point. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/01/cut-this-story/7823/

Second, though related to the first, I understand the writer's background as a some sort of leader in the Christian faith. But the reference to Lent in this piece seems completely gratuitous and fails to use it with any effect toward the main theme.

Third, echoing Rick Santorum's reaction to a Kennedy speech, if I read the phrase "patchwork quilt" one more time I'm going to throw up. The writer holds himself out as a writer and so should (please) refrain from using cliches (see First point).

Finally, as to the substance, I'm reminded of one of the dumbest questions I ever asked. It was the 1970's, I was on a school field trip into a forest and a one-time roll-back of DLST to February had been imposed in response to the "Energy Crisis." I asked the teacher if the deer were not negatively affected and confused by this. The point being that the days will be the same length and the increase in light will be the same no matter what, rendering the entire discussion a waste of time.

JTZ

Posted Sun, Mar 11, 2:53 p.m. Inappropriate

I've wondered why they call the period just ended "standard" time anymore, since it's only in place for one-third of the year!!! Why not at least call this period, now called daylight saving time, "standard," since it's in place for two-thirds of the year? Then call the other four months "winter" time!!!

Better, though, would be to adopt one or the other and do away with "spring forward" and "fall back." Since it seems that the preference is the present DST time, as evidenced by it being in place ~8 out of 12 months, adopt that schedule year-round.

bricsa

Posted Mon, Mar 12, 1:19 p.m. Inappropriate

Before clocks and artificial lighting came into widespread use, humans rose with the sun and went to sleep when the sun went down. Anything having to do with time, Standard or Daylight, could reasonably be called "unnatural."

orino

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »