What Mars means to Earth
NASA's Curiosity rover isn't just another robot we sent into space; it's a game-changer for science.
NASA
As you are no doubt aware, at 1:38 a.m. on Monday morning, NASA and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/Caltech succeeded in landing a one-ton rover named Curiosity on the surface of Mars. This effort required years of scientific, technical and engineering preparation, resulting in a novel multi-stage process for getting heavy equipment onto the red planet, rife with steps which, if any failed, would likely cause mission failure.
The landing occurred without a single problem, including minutes during the critical last phases of the flight when the spacecraft was out of communication with Earth and ran autonomously.
While this effort will no doubt have a great impact in improving our knowledge of the Mars geology and surface, including habitability for future human missions and perhaps information on past life in the targeted crater, there is a deeper meaning to this effort:
Science is reality.
At a time when a large and increasing fraction of the U.S. population does not "believe in" science (i.e., objectively provable reality) — or, worse, has bought into the idea that science is just one choice on the reality menu — NASA has again given concrete reason to understand that science works, and that science is not an option, not a theory, not a menu item, but instead represents the finest efforts of human minds in understanding, and addressing, objective reality.
Those on Earth who currently think that science is a political football should take note: Not only are you endangering your own reputation, you are endangering the welfare of your constituents and, today, of the planet itself.
Any person or party that mocks science should be considered for what he, she or it is — a threat to the welfare and future of us all. Under the influence of political propagandists, misled religious zealots, and truly dangerous television and radio empires (such as Fox [Not] News and Rush Limbaugh), too many people today have been led to believe that science is in some way an option to opinion.
Science is as optional as gravity. Ignorance is the only real option.
It is time for the U.S. to catch back up to the world in this matter, and recognize the value of scientific study and theory, the use of scientific consensus in guiding public policy, and the wonders that we can achieve when we abandon self-aggrandizing political fantasy in favor of objective scientific knowledge.
We should use this marvelous achievement to create a new cultural change in the United States, returning us to the group intelligence of past eras, when no one doubted that an experiment, done with the same result several times, demonstrated an objective truth. Not an opinion, not a religious position, not a political chip, but another addition to human scientific knowledge.
The world owes much to the people of NASA, of JPL, and to the taxpayers of the U.S., who have achieved the most important step in space exploration yet attempted. This was done by a willing and informed government, working with private contractors, paid for with taxes. It stands as one of the greatest of tributes to human intelligence yet achieved, shoulder to shoulder with decoding the human genome.
I highly recommend that you take a moment to watch the scene inside JPL headquarters in Pasadena, as Curiosity makes its way safely to the Martian surface. We owe a great deal to those pictured in their moment of triumph, and citizens of the U.S. owe it to themselves, if they wish to remain a great nation, to put a rapid end to the rise of ignorance in their country that threatens scientific endeavor and the acceptance of scientific findings.
Thanks go out to all of the people who, using Science, Technology, Engineering and Math, just flew a car-sized laboratory across the solar system, landed it safely at the end of four lines under a crane under a rocket under a parachute, to bring us yet more scientific knowledge about the world.
It is time for all Earth inhabitants to recognize the value of science. In doing so, we will find common ground for agreeing on other important things.
Long live Science.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!










Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Thu, Aug 9, 8:26 a.m. Inappropriate
"the most important step in space exploration yet attempted"
Really? Curiosity is *awesome* and important, but it is the latest of a series of rovers. It will add to an already large body of knowledge of Mars. But it's more important than Apollo 8, the first mission to photograph the entire Earth in a single frame? More than Apollo 11, the first steps on another world? More than the Voyager probes, which brought us our first shots of four worlds and their host of moons? More than Cassini, Galileo, Magellan, Viking, the ISS, Space X Dragon, the Pioneer program, Dawn, and Sputnik?
It's definitely the *coolest* landing sequence ever, but is it the most important step ever?
Posted Thu, Aug 9, 1:16 p.m. Inappropriate
Today we just learned than Niel Armstrong has had multiple bypass surgery. He's 82 years old. I believe that we will live to see a day when the last man to have set foot on another planetary body is gone. Curiosity may be the last great space probe for decades. And that is the true and lasting shame of this generation. We achieved so much, then we just shrugged and turned away. Mankind explores. We push our boundaries ever outward. We are, as Sagan said, a means by which the universe can understand itself. If we stop being that, our reason to exist ceases, and we may as well cease with it because we are no longer doing anything useful on a cosmic scale. That is not a partisan message, it is a human message, and those who wish us to return to space exploration should be making that message forcefully to everyone every day, not engaging in petty political jousts.
Posted Thu, Aug 9, 2:38 p.m. Inappropriate
Sometimes families can't afford vacations.
Posted Thu, Aug 9, 4:57 p.m. Inappropriate
Science has become politicized because recent advances in knowledge about the effect of humanity's economic activities on Earth's capacity to maintain us challenges the prerogatives of many in the ruling elites. Think oil and coal company executives. They in turn have turned on the money spigot for a vigorous anti-intellectual, anti-science campaign by the likes of Fox News, the Heartland Institute, and many others. Check out anthropogenic global warming "denier" websites like http://wattsupwiththat.com/ -- truly appalling, but it's as American as apple pie. See, e.g., http://www.amazon.com/Anti-Intellectualism-American-Life-Richard-Hofstadter/dp/0394703170
Posted Thu, Aug 9, 9:20 p.m. Inappropriate
Does David Dicks still have his Party Appointed Position at UW's College of the Environment?
Gotta ensure the science supports the political agenda!
Posted Fri, Aug 10, 3:36 p.m. Inappropriate
Science should be a means of bringing people together, not a partisan bludgeon. To that end, it is worth recalling that when it comes to the abuses of science, villainy is bipartisan. In addition to the issues cited in this article, think about the vaccine-autism link, which while false, was unsrupulously promoted and caused a number of deaths, since misinformed parents chose not to vaccinate their children. On the subject of climate change, while the deniers can be accused of misrepresenting the facts, so too can those who present dramatic visions of an unlivable future that go well beyond what climate science actually says.
I am not so concerned about explicit rejection of scientific theories. Creationists present a loud but fringe view that, though I find it disagreeable, really can't cause too much damage. Lack of national progress in Congress on climate change is more the result of fear of the economic impact of carbon pricing than on straight up denial. I am more concerned about the disconnect between the public and the scientific community. I have my responsibility in this, since I am a member of the scientific community, and I struggle with the question of how to make my work relevant to the public. But perhaps the excitement over the Curiosity landing will help, as will as the discovery of the Higgs boson a few months ago.
Posted Sun, Aug 12, 11:47 a.m. Inappropriate
Hear, hear.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.